Subject: "RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual improvement?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Marketing CF Topic #71
Show all folders

ZulghinlourTue 13-Nov-07 05:05 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#97, "RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual improvement?"


          

>One side thought: how much time do you estimate will be spent
>creating and/or editing areas before CF eventually shuts down?
> How much of that time would be saved if a graphical editor
>were available? If the saved time is more than the 18 months
>it would take you to build the thing, then in the long run it
>might be worthwhile.
>
>The counter-argument, of course, is that your time (as an
>Implementor) is worth much more than the time spent by
>heroimms creating their areas. So it's not an apples to
>apples comparison.

A valid point, however the 18 months then also has to include maintenance of the tool. At one point I tried to write a quick and dirty "verification" tool that would at least let you know that you had exits right, flags, etc. That tool no longer exists because the maintenance cost to keep it up to date was worse than just loading an area and fixing the bugs.

I also like that you bring up balancing of resources, as I deal with that on almost a daily basis. The time of a 7 figure V.P. is much more valuable to the bottom line, than the time of a 5 figure individual contributor. I don't think the delta between the top and bottom of CF immortalhood is nearly that drastic, but it does exist in impact made on the game.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicA Proposal [View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Reply Why I would be against this., Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 09:45 AM, #45
Reply As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy..., Dervish, 14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
Reply The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
Reply RE: The question from me!, Valguarnera, 14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
     Reply RE: The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
          Reply RE: The question from me!, Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #44
               Reply RE: The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
                    Reply Without going into specifics., Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Reply Not I., Valguarnera, 08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Not I., Tahren, 08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
     Reply Another angle, Mekantos, 08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
     Reply I think you're missing the point., Cyradia, 12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
          Reply You put the worst spin imaginable on my post, Mekantos, 12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
          Reply You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-, Mekantos, 12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
          Reply RE: Why areas?, Valguarnera, 13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
          Reply Thank you for a good response -nt-, Mekantos, 13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
          Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
               Reply RE: Why areas?, Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Why areas?, Zulghinlour, 14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
                              Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 14-Nov-07 01:12 AM, #37
                              Reply Think systemic:, Valguarnera, 14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
                                   Reply RE: Think systemic:, Isildur, 14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
                                        Reply RE: Think systemic:, Zulghinlour, 14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
                                             Reply RE: Think systemic:, Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
                              Reply The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt, DurNominator, 14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
          Reply RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post, Daevryn, 13-Nov-07 09:01 AM, #9
               Reply Thanks for a good response -nt-, Mekantos, 13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
          Reply does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro..., laxman, 13-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #10
               Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
                    Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., laxman, 13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
                         Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
                         Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Isildur, 13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
                              Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:05 PM #20
                         Reply Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT, Dragomir, 13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
                         Reply actually I major in OEM nt, laxman, 13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
                         Reply If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
                              Reply Ninja society..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
                                   Reply I would love., Dallevian, 13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
                                   Reply There is a CF facebook group, Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
                                        Reply No, thanks., Dallevian, 13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
                                   Reply RE: Ninja society..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
                                        Reply Re: generalizations, TheDude, 13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
                                        Reply RE: Re: generalizations, Stunna, 13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
                                        Reply RE: Re: generalizations, TheDude, 13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
                                             Reply Good Post, Stunna, 13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
                                        Reply RE: generalizations, Valguarnera, 13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
                                             Reply Well, there goes me assuming again.., TheDude, 13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
                                             Reply That's not the problem..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
                                        Reply One idea I really like..., Gryshilniar, 13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
     Reply RE: Not I., colospgsbryan, 08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
Top General Discussions Marketing CF Topic #71 Previous topic | Next topic