Subject: "RE: Why areas?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Marketing CF Topic #71
Show all folders

IsildurWed 14-Nov-07 01:12 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#84, "RE: Why areas?"


          

>Less mechanic-wise, how you work with the team, how you respond to criticism, etc.

I'm with you on that. Just wondering if writing an area is the only way to explore someone's ability to do those things. I guess it does have the advantage of being low-risk. If somebody writes a crappy area and can't handle criticism, at least no mortals are "harmed" by having to endure crappy immteraction.

>Can I get a "narrowly focused" staff position that just lets
>me code all the time and not interact with anyone ever?

You joke, but I seriously wouldn't have a problem with that. Not for me, I mean, but for you, if that's what you really want to do. Like you said elsewhere, this isn't a job. As long as everything that needs to get done is getting done, letting people focus on the things that most appeal to them might help prevent burnout.

>You can do all the role-play interactiony side of things as a
>mortal, there is no need to be an immortal.

For the most part, yeah. I think people are just remembering how much it made their day the first time an imm inhabited some mob and started talking to them, and wishing they could help make that stuff happen more regularly. As a player I might be able to provide someone with quality mortal interaction, but it still won't "wow" them as much as if I had done the same thing as an imm.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicA Proposal [View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Reply Why I would be against this., Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 09:45 AM, #45
Reply As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy..., Dervish, 14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
Reply The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
Reply RE: The question from me!, Valguarnera, 14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
     Reply RE: The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
          Reply RE: The question from me!, Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #44
               Reply RE: The question from me!, Dervish, 14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
                    Reply Without going into specifics., Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Reply Not I., Valguarnera, 08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Not I., Tahren, 08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
     Reply Another angle, Mekantos, 08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
     Reply I think you're missing the point., Cyradia, 12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
          Reply You put the worst spin imaginable on my post, Mekantos, 12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
          Reply You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-, Mekantos, 12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
          Reply RE: Why areas?, Valguarnera, 13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
          Reply Thank you for a good response -nt-, Mekantos, 13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
          Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
               Reply RE: Why areas?, Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Why areas?, Zulghinlour, 14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
                              Reply RE: Why areas?, Isildur, 14-Nov-07 01:12 AM #37
                              Reply Think systemic:, Valguarnera, 14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
                                   Reply RE: Think systemic:, Isildur, 14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
                                        Reply RE: Think systemic:, Zulghinlour, 14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
                                             Reply RE: Think systemic:, Lyristeon, 14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
                              Reply The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt, DurNominator, 14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
          Reply RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post, Daevryn, 13-Nov-07 09:01 AM, #9
               Reply Thanks for a good response -nt-, Mekantos, 13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
          Reply does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro..., laxman, 13-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #10
               Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
                    Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., laxman, 13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
                         Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
                         Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Isildur, 13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
                              Reply RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:05 PM, #20
                         Reply Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT, Dragomir, 13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
                         Reply actually I major in OEM nt, laxman, 13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
                         Reply If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
                              Reply Ninja society..., Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
                                   Reply I would love., Dallevian, 13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
                                   Reply There is a CF facebook group, Zulghinlour, 13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
                                        Reply No, thanks., Dallevian, 13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
                                   Reply RE: Ninja society..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
                                        Reply Re: generalizations, TheDude, 13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
                                        Reply RE: Re: generalizations, Stunna, 13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
                                        Reply RE: Re: generalizations, TheDude, 13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
                                             Reply Good Post, Stunna, 13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
                                        Reply RE: generalizations, Valguarnera, 13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
                                             Reply Well, there goes me assuming again.., TheDude, 13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
                                             Reply That's not the problem..., Stunna, 13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
                                        Reply One idea I really like..., Gryshilniar, 13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
     Reply RE: Not I., colospgsbryan, 08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
Top General Discussions Marketing CF Topic #71 Previous topic | Next topic