Lyristeon | Wed 14-Nov-07 09:32 AM |
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
| |
|
#118, "RE: The question from me!"
Edited on Wed 14-Nov-07 09:33 AM
|
> >>1) Why should we trust you with our code? >Is it really neccessary to reveal full sources? I think not. >Maybe I'm mistaken, of course. But, lets say, if I am doing >shifters revamp (just for example), I dont really need the >access to spells of invoker, or how shop system works. At >least, at the beginning of the work. And as I understand you, >first few tasks will be much simpler and require much less >current sources reading than shifters revamp
I think you misunderstood. Why would we trust you with any source code at all? You haven't done anything to earn that trust.
> >>2) Why would we want staff "without obligations"? So if we >>assign you something there's no guarantee you'll ever work >on >>it? >Well, maybe because something its better than nothing? I agree >that well rounded, all knowing, hardly working member is >better, but you still have more tasks/ideas to work on, than >volunteers to do this.
No, I think nothing is better, to be quite frank. We wind up releasing source code, someone works on it, it doesn't work and we aren't happy with it, the person we had no reason to trust to begiin with whines and gets mad at our rigid stance on building things and the player gives the code out to get even.
> >>3) In general, we want well-rounded staff. Even if you had >>the access, if you haven't demonstrated an understanding of >>how the game runs (building an area is a very good check of >>this), you're likely to build code that doesn't work well >>within the game, either stylistically, or mechanically. >Alas, I can not build areas, though I am interested a bit. >Moreeven, I dont think its really needed for CF now.
I disagree. There are so many areas that need to be rewritten because it doesn't hold up to the standards that the current Imps have require. > >I think the chances of writing 'bad' code are less when it is >concrete written task, so the one just codes, not creates the >algorithm. > >Still disagree?
Yep.
>
|
|
|
A Proposal
[View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Why I would be against this.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:45 AM, #45
As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy...,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
RE: The question from me!,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
RE: The question from me!,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:33 AM #44
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
Without going into specifics.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Not I.,
Valguarnera,
08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
RE: Not I.,
Tahren,
08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
Another angle,
Mekantos,
08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
I think you're missing the point.,
Cyradia,
12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
RE: Why areas?,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
Thank you for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 01:12 AM, #37
Think systemic:,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
RE: Think systemic:,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
RE: Think systemic:,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
RE: Think systemic:,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt,
DurNominator,
14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Daevryn,
13-Nov-07 09:01 AM, #9
Thanks for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #10
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:05 PM, #20
Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT,
Dragomir,
13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
actually I major in OEM nt,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
Ninja society...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
I would love.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
There is a CF facebook group,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
No, thanks.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
RE: Ninja society...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
RE: Re: generalizations,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
RE: Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
Good Post,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
RE: generalizations,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
Well, there goes me assuming again..,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
That's not the problem...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
One idea I really like...,
Gryshilniar,
13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
RE: Not I.,
colospgsbryan,
08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
| |
|