Daevryn | Tue 13-Nov-07 09:01 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#90, "RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post"
|
>Why was that deemed the absolute lowest work that has to be >done before someone could advance?
I like it because it's educational. It teaches you a lot about how the game is put together which is useful for other things.
For example, if you haven't written an area and don't understand all of the pieces involved, you're probably not competent to run your own quests if they include any sort of custom mobs, objects, or rewards, even given the tools to do so.
>Surely you could base >promotions on Promotional Efforts outside the game, Quest >Construction, as well as Artwork and Stories to enrich it.
I'm all about promotions, stories, and artwork, although you don't actually need to be an imm to produce those things, do you?
As far as quest construction... now you're either talking about coming up with the idea for a non-automated quest that will take me a bunch of time to run, or an automated quest that will take me a bunch of time to code. The creative part is by far the easy/fast part in both cases, at least for me.
|
|
|
A Proposal
[View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Why I would be against this.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:45 AM, #45
As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy...,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
RE: The question from me!,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
RE: The question from me!,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #44
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
Without going into specifics.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Not I.,
Valguarnera,
08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
RE: Not I.,
Tahren,
08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
Another angle,
Mekantos,
08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
I think you're missing the point.,
Cyradia,
12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
RE: Why areas?,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
Thank you for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 01:12 AM, #37
Think systemic:,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
RE: Think systemic:,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
RE: Think systemic:,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
RE: Think systemic:,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt,
DurNominator,
14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Daevryn,
13-Nov-07 09:01 AM #9
Thanks for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #10
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:05 PM, #20
Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT,
Dragomir,
13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
actually I major in OEM nt,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
Ninja society...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
I would love.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
There is a CF facebook group,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
No, thanks.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
RE: Ninja society...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
RE: Re: generalizations,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
RE: Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
Good Post,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
RE: generalizations,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
Well, there goes me assuming again..,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
That's not the problem...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
One idea I really like...,
Gryshilniar,
13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
RE: Not I.,
colospgsbryan,
08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
| |
|