Subject: "Imms are too soft." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34712
Show all folders

ShapaThu 19-Aug-10 09:26 PM
Member since 22nd Jun 2006
252 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34882, "Imms are too soft."


          

First of all there is no "ideal" system.

The judges in the real life are very well paid, they also have monthes to think about every crime. Yet we all know the stories about someone sit in the jail for 15 years before people create DNA analysis and then judges agree that they made the mistake and ruined someone's life.

I think in 90% situations imms are right when they punish someone, but in other 10% they are wrong. But there is no better solution for this.
What would happen if IMMS didn't control CF at all? The next day Torak (i'm using this name for example, i know there are other cheaters too) and his 7 men OOC gank would force everybody to leave CF because it's impossible to fight against 7 men OOC gank.

Could IMMS act better? Perhaps. Perhaps not. At least every IMM spent at least 1000 hours helping CF and they care about CF for sure.


Imms are too soft. Just look at this. Torak (again, i'm using this name for example) is breaking every possible rule for 10 years already. Then he comes to the forums and demands the right to make OOC groups (few threads down). And other people really listen him and discuss it.


Just ban from CF and from forums few people who are destructive for CF and delete all their threads. It will be better for anybody.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicAgain, I say: [View all] , Stunna, Wed 18-Aug-10 04:36 PM
Reply is it only a lack of vision?, vorian, 22-Aug-10 04:07 PM, #71
Reply RE: is it only a lack of vision?, Isildur, 22-Aug-10 04:33 PM, #72
Reply Imms are too soft., Shapa, 19-Aug-10 09:26 PM #43
Reply FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention), Larcat, 19-Aug-10 04:38 PM, #29
Reply RE: FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention), Valguarnera, 19-Aug-10 06:21 PM, #32
     Reply RE: FWIW (Inre: lack of long term retention), Larcat, 19-Aug-10 11:41 PM, #51
Reply Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Valguarnera, 18-Aug-10 10:48 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), HammerSong, 18-Aug-10 11:43 PM, #2
     Reply My Take (really long; read at your own discretion), Thinhallen, 19-Aug-10 04:56 AM, #4
     Reply RE: My Take (really long; read at your own discretion), HammerSong, 19-Aug-10 06:42 PM, #34
     Reply :), trewyn, 21-Aug-10 12:51 AM, #67
          Reply "the time between the fun and not fun is too big", Thinhallen, 21-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #68
               Reply RE: , Daevryn, 21-Aug-10 08:46 PM, #69
     Reply Good post, one point., A2, 20-Aug-10 03:09 AM, #53
     Reply like (n/t) (meant to be under Valg's post)*, Nnaeshuk, 19-Aug-10 12:24 PM, #13
     Reply Great post., Asthiss, 19-Aug-10 02:07 AM, #3
     Reply Thanks for the link inside., Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 06:38 AM, #5
     Reply I think at this point..., vargal, 19-Aug-10 06:54 AM, #6
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Jhyrbian, 19-Aug-10 08:36 AM, #7
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 09:04 AM, #8
     Reply Well said, Torak, 19-Aug-10 12:37 PM, #14
     Reply Nope. 2003., Valguarnera, 19-Aug-10 05:46 PM, #30
          Reply Ah~, Torak, 19-Aug-10 07:43 PM, #39
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 12:44 PM, #15
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), ORB, 19-Aug-10 12:55 PM, #16
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 01:35 PM, #19
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), A2, 20-Aug-10 03:17 AM, #54
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 20-Aug-10 08:02 AM, #61
               Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), A2, 20-Aug-10 12:05 PM, #63
                    Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 20-Aug-10 01:10 PM, #64
                         Reply There's a lot going on in this thread, A2, 20-Aug-10 05:57 PM, #65
     Reply I disagree that it's dogma., Valguarnera, 19-Aug-10 06:02 PM, #31
          Reply Removed my southwest discussion, off topic. n/t, Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 10:03 PM, #46
          Reply As someone who has worked in several restaurants..., TMNS, 20-Aug-10 12:17 AM, #52
     Reply Talk about inflated ego., _Magus_, 19-Aug-10 02:32 PM, #26
          Reply Umm..., Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 08:34 PM, #41
               Reply RE: Umm..., Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 09:52 PM, #47
                    Reply Yup NT, Lyristeon, 20-Aug-10 07:23 AM, #59
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Zulghinlour, 19-Aug-10 01:05 PM, #17
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 01:49 PM, #18
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 01:56 PM, #20
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 02:38 PM, #22
               Reply It goes both ways, Torak, 19-Aug-10 02:19 PM, #25
               Reply RE: It goes both ways, Daevryn, 19-Aug-10 07:24 PM, #36
                    Reply Well..., Torak, 19-Aug-10 07:43 PM, #38
                         Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 19-Aug-10 08:02 PM, #40
                              Reply As someone you've talked to ooc about mechanics, Stunna, 20-Aug-10 06:04 PM, #66
               Reply Good post, probably. n/t, Stunna, 19-Aug-10 02:25 PM, #27
               Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), A2, 20-Aug-10 03:24 AM, #55
               Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Lyristeon, 20-Aug-10 07:33 AM, #60
          Reply <3, Torak, 19-Aug-10 01:57 PM, #21
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Valguarnera, 19-Aug-10 06:33 PM, #33
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 09:39 PM, #45
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Daevryn, 19-Aug-10 07:26 PM, #37
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 09:31 PM, #44
               Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Daevryn, 19-Aug-10 11:23 PM, #50
                    Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 20-Aug-10 08:35 AM, #62
                         Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Daevryn, 21-Aug-10 08:51 PM, #70
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Zulghinlour, 19-Aug-10 09:34 PM, #42
               Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 10:01 PM, #48
                    Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), A2, 20-Aug-10 03:32 AM, #56
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Stunna, 19-Aug-10 02:10 PM, #24
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 10:10 PM, #49
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), ORB, 19-Aug-10 09:22 AM, #9
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), A2, 20-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #57
          Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), ORB, 20-Aug-10 07:05 AM, #58
     Reply Newbie Channel pt2., Kalageadon, 19-Aug-10 10:19 AM, #10
     Reply Good post, MoetEtChandon, 19-Aug-10 12:01 PM, #11
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Malakhi, 19-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #12
     Reply Wow, thanks for writing out what I was thinking! Hopefu..., Stunna, 19-Aug-10 02:06 PM, #23
     Reply Party analogy, Quixotic, 19-Aug-10 04:28 PM, #28
     Reply RE: Party analogy, Valguarnera, 19-Aug-10 06:56 PM, #35
     Reply RE: Short-term vs. long-term retention (long), Vintus (Anonymous), 02-Sep-10 12:17 AM, #73
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34712 Previous topic | Next topic