Nightgaunt_ | Sun 19-Jul-09 08:51 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
188 posts
| |
|
#25770, "RE: There's always succumb"
|
Succumbing as a non rager warrior that gets ambushed by nightgaunt to a conjurer with 7+ ranks on him sounds like semi-suicide. You could always quaff a pwk potion instead, then you know where your corpse is at least.
And yes, you can avoid getting gaunted but in reality it is just more fun to quit if you play a char that cannot handle the gaunt thrown at you.
Not that I expect something to change, it is a relatively small window where you are a free(ish) kill and one can always change hometown to another continent (if this still works) or rank when a conjie is not on.
|
|
|
Making some classes more fun to play
[View all] , Nightgaunt_, Wed 15-Jul-09 05:15 AM
Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 07:50 AM, #76
If you mean the warrior that died within the last hour,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #77
RE: If you mean the warrior that died within the last h...,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #80
There's always succumb,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #82
RE: There's always succumb,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:51 AM #83
RE: There's always succumb,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:56 AM, #84
You know what?,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 09:02 AM, #85
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:20 AM, #79
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:42 AM, #81
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 12:20 PM, #87
Evil conjie isn't that bad,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #11
Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 10:11 AM, #21
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 12:41 PM, #23
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 03:59 PM, #24
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:06 PM, #27
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:20 PM, #29
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:21 PM, #30
Umm,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:26 PM, #32
RE: Umm,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #35
Here's how I did it,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 05:02 PM, #40
I'd also add,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:27 PM, #33
RE: I'd also add,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 05:24 PM, #41
RE: I'd also add,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:31 PM, #44
RE: I'd also add,
Xanthrailles,
18-Jul-09 09:05 PM, #73
seriously,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 02:38 AM, #46
It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things.,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 07:31 AM, #47
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Nightgaunt_,
17-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #48
This is funny.,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #50
Razmorthin was ten times the player...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 01:33 AM, #54
WTF,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:23 AM, #55
Have you stated any facts that haven't been outright re...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:36 AM, #59
RE: Have you stated any facts that haven't been outrigh...,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #60
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:33 PM, #51
You clearly don't know your stuff,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #52
Ah, the "you suck l2p argument",
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:30 AM, #56
RE: Ah, the,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:31 PM, #61
Tell you what,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 02:25 PM, #63
I'd like to see this,
Lokain,
18-Jul-09 02:49 PM, #64
I can see why it could be frustrating,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 04:11 PM, #68
RE: I'd like to see this,
Nightgaunt_,
18-Jul-09 07:27 PM, #71
RE: I'd like to see this,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:54 PM, #72
It's impossible not to,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:10 AM, #78
RE: It's impossible not to,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 09:03 AM, #86
I'm talking about Turing, not you,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 12:23 PM, #88
RE: I'm talking about Turing, not you,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 10:34 PM, #90
RE: I'd like to see this,
Isildur,
18-Jul-09 10:59 PM, #74
RE: Tell you what,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:58 PM, #65
Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Scrimbul,
18-Jul-09 03:05 PM, #66
RE: Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 06:41 PM, #69
I think...,
Adekar,
19-Jul-09 07:04 PM, #89
I don't consider it to be "manning up",
incognito,
18-Jul-09 03:34 PM, #67
I learned more in one evil conjie than you learned in 5...,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 10:10 PM, #53
Battle.net,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:33 AM, #57
He has, you're just too obstinate to see it.,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #58
I hate when I'm playing a different game.,
Straklaw,
17-Jul-09 03:55 PM, #49
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #43
Not what I'm saying either,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:24 PM, #31
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 11:54 AM, #2
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Valkenar,
15-Jul-09 02:45 PM, #3
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 05:17 PM, #6
That's not entirely true though,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 07:25 PM, #7
RE: That's not entirely true though,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 09:31 PM, #9
Eh,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 11:32 PM, #10
You missed the point,
Valkenar,
16-Jul-09 08:19 AM, #18
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 09:09 AM, #19
RE: You missed the point,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #20
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 10:43 AM, #22
And then...,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:00 PM, #25
I'd say they are not comparable,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #34
RE: I'd say they are not comparable,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #45
Paths isn't needed to compare,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:45 PM, #62
RE: Paths isn't needed to compare,
Plushka,
18-Jul-09 07:19 PM, #70
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Nightgaunt_,
15-Jul-09 03:15 PM, #4
having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
laxman,
15-Jul-09 05:04 PM, #5
RE: having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 09:14 PM, #8
Quick question then...,
Abernyte,
16-Jul-09 05:11 AM, #13
RE: Quick question then...,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:49 AM, #16
Evil conjurers with a devil vs. good conjurers with an ...,
Theerkla,
16-Jul-09 05:17 AM, #14
Archons are bad asses,
Dwoggurd,
16-Jul-09 05:35 AM, #15
RE: Archons are bad asses,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:04 PM, #26
I don't.,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:32 PM, #37
It's not as hard to kill archon-toters as claimed,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:30 PM, #36
Being a scion makes a big difference nt,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:34 AM, #12
Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:52 AM, #17
RE: Yes and no:,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:13 PM, #28
Agree on this one,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:33 PM, #38
RE: Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:26 PM, #42
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Plushka,
16-Jul-09 05:00 PM, #39
I'd settle for making trappers simply playable!,
Zizzle,
19-Jul-09 12:20 AM, #75
invokers,
Stunna,
15-Jul-09 11:38 AM, #1
RE: invokers,
Onewingedangel,
22-Jul-09 07:00 PM, #91
| |
|