|
Nightgaunt_ | Wed 15-Jul-09 05:15 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
188 posts
|     |
|
#25669, "Making some classes more fun to play"
|
Two classes that are pretty rare (I think) compared to other more instant gratification classes like warriors and shifters.
Invoker:
The days of when invokers with 2000 hp taking grazes while geysers doing UNSPEAKS are gone. As far as I understand they used to be balanced somewhat by the investment of time that it takes to bring one up to hero. I don't think this is needed anymore so my suggestion is to remove the requirement to perfect spells OR lower it to 90%.
Conjurer:
Now, there was quite a while ago I tried an evil conjie and I might have some data mixed up with a neutral one. But one fact that made it less fun to play one is that a devil/demon can turn on you when you are enough damaged. Roleplay wise it is a wash, yes evil beings would like to turn on you but one can argue that darkbind is strong enough to prevent it. So my suggestion is to make it impossible for a servitor to turn on you while being darkbound. It would also make it more likely for a conjie to stay in close fights.
Comments, suggestions, insults? Or even more ideas?
|
|
|
 Making some classes more fun to play
[View all] , Nightgaunt_, Wed 15-Jul-09 05:15 AM
  Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 07:50 AM, #76
 If you mean the warrior that died within the last hour,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #77
 RE: If you mean the warrior that died within the last h...,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #80
There's always succumb,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #82
RE: There's always succumb,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:51 AM, #83
RE: There's always succumb,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:56 AM, #84
You know what?,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 09:02 AM, #85
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:20 AM, #79
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:42 AM, #81
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 12:20 PM, #87
Evil conjie isn't that bad,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #11
Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 10:11 AM, #21
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 12:41 PM, #23
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 03:59 PM, #24
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:06 PM, #27
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:20 PM, #29
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:21 PM, #30
Umm,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:26 PM, #32
RE: Umm,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #35
Here's how I did it,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 05:02 PM, #40
I'd also add,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:27 PM, #33
RE: I'd also add,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 05:24 PM, #41
RE: I'd also add,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:31 PM, #44
RE: I'd also add,
Xanthrailles,
18-Jul-09 09:05 PM, #73
seriously,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 02:38 AM, #46
It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things.,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 07:31 AM, #47
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Nightgaunt_,
17-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #48
This is funny.,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #50
Razmorthin was ten times the player...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 01:33 AM, #54
WTF,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:23 AM, #55
Have you stated any facts that haven't been outright re...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:36 AM, #59
RE: Have you stated any facts that haven't been outrigh...,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #60
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:33 PM, #51
You clearly don't know your stuff,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #52
Ah, the "you suck l2p argument",
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:30 AM, #56
RE: Ah, the,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:31 PM, #61
Tell you what,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 02:25 PM, #63
I'd like to see this,
Lokain,
18-Jul-09 02:49 PM, #64
I can see why it could be frustrating,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 04:11 PM, #68
RE: I'd like to see this,
Nightgaunt_,
18-Jul-09 07:27 PM, #71
RE: I'd like to see this,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:54 PM, #72
It's impossible not to,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:10 AM, #78
RE: It's impossible not to,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 09:03 AM, #86
I'm talking about Turing, not you,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 12:23 PM, #88
RE: I'm talking about Turing, not you,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 10:34 PM, #90
RE: I'd like to see this,
Isildur,
18-Jul-09 10:59 PM, #74
RE: Tell you what,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:58 PM, #65
Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Scrimbul,
18-Jul-09 03:05 PM, #66
RE: Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 06:41 PM, #69
I think...,
Adekar ,
19-Jul-09 07:04 PM, #89
I don't consider it to be "manning up",
incognito,
18-Jul-09 03:34 PM, #67
I learned more in one evil conjie than you learned in 5...,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 10:10 PM, #53
Battle.net,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:33 AM, #57
He has, you're just too obstinate to see it.,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #58
I hate when I'm playing a different game.,
Straklaw,
17-Jul-09 03:55 PM, #49
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #43
Not what I'm saying either,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:24 PM, #31
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 11:54 AM, #2
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Valkenar,
15-Jul-09 02:45 PM, #3
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 05:17 PM, #6
That's not entirely true though,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 07:25 PM, #7
RE: That's not entirely true though,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 09:31 PM, #9
Eh,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 11:32 PM, #10
You missed the point,
Valkenar,
16-Jul-09 08:19 AM, #18
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 09:09 AM, #19
RE: You missed the point,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #20
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 10:43 AM, #22
And then...,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:00 PM, #25
I'd say they are not comparable,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #34
RE: I'd say they are not comparable,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #45
Paths isn't needed to compare,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:45 PM, #62
RE: Paths isn't needed to compare,
Plushka,
18-Jul-09 07:19 PM, #70
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Nightgaunt_,
15-Jul-09 03:15 PM, #4
having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
laxman,
15-Jul-09 05:04 PM, #5
RE: having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 09:14 PM, #8
Quick question then...,
Abernyte,
16-Jul-09 05:11 AM, #13
RE: Quick question then...,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:49 AM, #16
Evil conjurers with a devil vs. good conjurers with an ...,
Theerkla,
16-Jul-09 05:17 AM, #14
Archons are bad asses,
Dwoggurd,
16-Jul-09 05:35 AM, #15
RE: Archons are bad asses,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:04 PM, #26
I don't.,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:32 PM, #37
It's not as hard to kill archon-toters as claimed,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:30 PM, #36
Being a scion makes a big difference nt,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:34 AM, #12
Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:52 AM, #17
RE: Yes and no:,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:13 PM, #28
Agree on this one,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:33 PM, #38
RE: Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:26 PM, #42
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Plushka,
16-Jul-09 05:00 PM, #39
I'd settle for making trappers simply playable!,
Zizzle,
19-Jul-09 12:20 AM, #75
invokers,
Stunna,
15-Jul-09 11:38 AM, #1
RE: invokers,
Onewingedangel,
22-Jul-09 07:00 PM, #91
| |
|
