Subject: "RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #25669
Show all folders

TuringFri 17-Jul-09 06:33 PM
Member since 06th Apr 2009
112 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#25730, "RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things."


          

>There's a reason you get the scrying spells and/or the raven
>familiar.
>
>If you don't know where there's a pile of mobs to kill to make
>a given servitor happy before quickly running off to your
>destination, that's your fault. You are not supposed to
>conjure them and happily run off to battle right after, and if
>you aren't sure that you can get to a fight you shouldn't be
>conjuring at all.
>
>You just want to be able to have a larger margin for error on
>a class that, as an evil alignment CAN TAKE OUT ANY OTHER
>CLASS IN THE GAME NO MATTER HOW WELL GEARED IT IS.
>
>No, just, no.


You're obviously wrong. Evil conjurers are not powerhouses (now). It's obviously not easy to keep servitors happy in pvp because nobody has EVER done it consistantly with an evil conjurer. Kanaev and Raz abused a bug to get around the whole servant turning thing, and nobody except for them has lasted much more than 100 hours before rage deleting out of frustration. I can level sit all year and wipe out leveling groups in the 20s and 30s and I won't have proven a thing about the playability of the class. Impressive offense, Impressive utility, Laughable survivability.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicMaking some classes more fun to play [View all] , Nightgaunt_, Wed 15-Jul-09 05:15 AM
Reply Also on the subject of Nightgaunts, Nightgaunt_, 19-Jul-09 07:50 AM, #76
Reply If you mean the warrior that died within the last hour, incognito, 19-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #77
Reply RE: If you mean the warrior that died within the last h..., Nightgaunt_, 19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #80
     Reply There's always succumb, incognito, 19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #82
          Reply RE: There's always succumb, Nightgaunt_, 19-Jul-09 08:51 AM, #83
               Reply RE: There's always succumb, Daevryn, 19-Jul-09 08:56 AM, #84
               Reply You know what?, incognito, 19-Jul-09 09:02 AM, #85
Reply RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts, Daevryn, 19-Jul-09 08:20 AM, #79
     Reply RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts, Nightgaunt_, 19-Jul-09 08:42 AM, #81
          Reply RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts, Turing, 19-Jul-09 12:20 PM, #87
Reply Evil conjie isn't that bad, incognito, 16-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #11
Reply Flawed logic., Turing, 16-Jul-09 10:11 AM, #21
     Reply RE: Flawed logic., Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 12:41 PM, #23
          Reply RE: Flawed logic., Turing, 16-Jul-09 03:59 PM, #24
          Reply RE: Flawed logic., Habbs, 16-Jul-09 04:06 PM, #27
          Reply RE: Flawed logic., Turing, 16-Jul-09 04:20 PM, #29
               Reply RE: Flawed logic., Habbs, 16-Jul-09 04:21 PM, #30
          Reply Umm, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:26 PM, #32
          Reply RE: Umm, Habbs, 16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #35
               Reply Here's how I did it, incognito, 16-Jul-09 05:02 PM, #40
          Reply I'd also add, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:27 PM, #33
          Reply RE: I'd also add, Nightgaunt_, 16-Jul-09 05:24 PM, #41
               Reply RE: I'd also add, Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 06:31 PM, #44
               Reply RE: I'd also add, Xanthrailles, 18-Jul-09 09:05 PM, #73
               Reply seriously, incognito, 17-Jul-09 02:38 AM, #46
               Reply It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things., Scrimbul, 17-Jul-09 07:31 AM, #47
               Reply RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing..., Nightgaunt_, 17-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #48
               Reply This is funny., Turing, 17-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #50
                    Reply Razmorthin was ten times the player..., TMNS, 18-Jul-09 01:33 AM, #54
                         Reply WTF, Turing, 18-Jul-09 02:23 AM, #55
                              Reply Have you stated any facts that haven't been outright re..., TMNS, 18-Jul-09 03:36 AM, #59
                                   Reply RE: Have you stated any facts that haven't been outrigh..., Turing, 18-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #60
               Reply RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing..., Turing, 17-Jul-09 06:33 PM #51
                    Reply You clearly don't know your stuff, incognito, 17-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #52
                    Reply Ah, the "you suck l2p argument", Turing, 18-Jul-09 02:30 AM, #56
                         Reply RE: Ah, the, incognito, 18-Jul-09 01:31 PM, #61
                              Reply Tell you what, incognito, 18-Jul-09 02:25 PM, #63
                                   Reply I'd like to see this, Lokain, 18-Jul-09 02:49 PM, #64
                                   Reply I can see why it could be frustrating, incognito, 18-Jul-09 04:11 PM, #68
                                   Reply RE: I'd like to see this, Nightgaunt_, 18-Jul-09 07:27 PM, #71
                                   Reply RE: I'd like to see this, Turing, 18-Jul-09 08:54 PM, #72
                                        Reply It's impossible not to, incognito, 19-Jul-09 08:10 AM, #78
                                             Reply RE: It's impossible not to, Nightgaunt_, 19-Jul-09 09:03 AM, #86
                                                  Reply I'm talking about Turing, not you, incognito, 19-Jul-09 12:23 PM, #88
                                                       Reply RE: I'm talking about Turing, not you, Turing, 19-Jul-09 10:34 PM, #90
                                   Reply RE: I'd like to see this, Isildur, 18-Jul-09 10:59 PM, #74
                                   Reply RE: Tell you what, Turing, 18-Jul-09 02:58 PM, #65
                                        Reply Hold up your end of the bargain., Scrimbul, 18-Jul-09 03:05 PM, #66
                                        Reply RE: Hold up your end of the bargain., Turing, 18-Jul-09 06:41 PM, #69
                                        Reply I think..., Adekar, 19-Jul-09 07:04 PM, #89
                                        Reply I don't consider it to be "manning up", incognito, 18-Jul-09 03:34 PM, #67
                    Reply I learned more in one evil conjie than you learned in 5..., Scrimbul, 17-Jul-09 10:10 PM, #53
                         Reply Battle.net, Turing, 18-Jul-09 02:33 AM, #57
                              Reply He has, you're just too obstinate to see it., TMNS, 18-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #58
               Reply I hate when I'm playing a different game., Straklaw, 17-Jul-09 03:55 PM, #49
          Reply RE: Flawed logic., Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #43
          Reply Not what I'm saying either, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:24 PM, #31
Reply RE: Making some classes more fun to play, Daevryn, 15-Jul-09 11:54 AM, #2
Reply RE: Making some classes more fun to play, Valkenar, 15-Jul-09 02:45 PM, #3
Reply RE: Making some classes more fun to play, Isildur, 15-Jul-09 05:17 PM, #6
     Reply That's not entirely true though, Lokain, 15-Jul-09 07:25 PM, #7
          Reply RE: That's not entirely true though, Isildur, 15-Jul-09 09:31 PM, #9
               Reply Eh, Lokain, 15-Jul-09 11:32 PM, #10
               Reply You missed the point, Valkenar, 16-Jul-09 08:19 AM, #18
               Reply RE: You missed the point, Isildur, 16-Jul-09 09:09 AM, #19
                    Reply RE: You missed the point, Nightgaunt_, 16-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #20
                         Reply RE: You missed the point, Isildur, 16-Jul-09 10:43 AM, #22
                              Reply And then..., Turing, 16-Jul-09 04:00 PM, #25
               Reply I'd say they are not comparable, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #34
                    Reply RE: I'd say they are not comparable, Isildur, 16-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #45
                         Reply Paths isn't needed to compare, incognito, 18-Jul-09 01:45 PM, #62
                              Reply RE: Paths isn't needed to compare, Plushka, 18-Jul-09 07:19 PM, #70
Reply RE: Making some classes more fun to play, Nightgaunt_, 15-Jul-09 03:15 PM, #4
Reply having played 3 hero range evil conjies, laxman, 15-Jul-09 05:04 PM, #5
Reply RE: having played 3 hero range evil conjies, Daevryn, 15-Jul-09 09:14 PM, #8
     Reply Quick question then..., Abernyte, 16-Jul-09 05:11 AM, #13
     Reply RE: Quick question then..., Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 07:49 AM, #16
     Reply Evil conjurers with a devil vs. good conjurers with an ..., Theerkla, 16-Jul-09 05:17 AM, #14
          Reply Archons are bad asses, Dwoggurd, 16-Jul-09 05:35 AM, #15
          Reply RE: Archons are bad asses, Turing, 16-Jul-09 04:04 PM, #26
               Reply I don't., incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:32 PM, #37
          Reply It's not as hard to kill archon-toters as claimed, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:30 PM, #36
Reply Being a scion makes a big difference nt, incognito, 16-Jul-09 03:34 AM, #12
Reply Yes and no:, Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 07:52 AM, #17
     Reply RE: Yes and no:, Turing, 16-Jul-09 04:13 PM, #28
          Reply Agree on this one, incognito, 16-Jul-09 04:33 PM, #38
          Reply RE: Yes and no:, Daevryn, 16-Jul-09 06:26 PM, #42
Reply RE: Making some classes more fun to play, Plushka, 16-Jul-09 05:00 PM, #39
Reply I'd settle for making trappers simply playable!, Zizzle, 19-Jul-09 12:20 AM, #75
Reply invokers, Stunna, 15-Jul-09 11:38 AM, #1
     Reply RE: invokers, Onewingedangel, 22-Jul-09 07:00 PM, #91
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #25669 Previous topic | Next topic