Turing | Fri 17-Jul-09 06:33 PM |
Member since 06th Apr 2009
112 posts
| |
|
#25730, "RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things."
|
>There's a reason you get the scrying spells and/or the raven >familiar. > >If you don't know where there's a pile of mobs to kill to make >a given servitor happy before quickly running off to your >destination, that's your fault. You are not supposed to >conjure them and happily run off to battle right after, and if >you aren't sure that you can get to a fight you shouldn't be >conjuring at all. > >You just want to be able to have a larger margin for error on >a class that, as an evil alignment CAN TAKE OUT ANY OTHER >CLASS IN THE GAME NO MATTER HOW WELL GEARED IT IS. > >No, just, no.
You're obviously wrong. Evil conjurers are not powerhouses (now). It's obviously not easy to keep servitors happy in pvp because nobody has EVER done it consistantly with an evil conjurer. Kanaev and Raz abused a bug to get around the whole servant turning thing, and nobody except for them has lasted much more than 100 hours before rage deleting out of frustration. I can level sit all year and wipe out leveling groups in the 20s and 30s and I won't have proven a thing about the playability of the class. Impressive offense, Impressive utility, Laughable survivability.
|
|
|
Making some classes more fun to play
[View all] , Nightgaunt_, Wed 15-Jul-09 05:15 AM
Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 07:50 AM, #76
If you mean the warrior that died within the last hour,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #77
RE: If you mean the warrior that died within the last h...,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #80
There's always succumb,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:43 AM, #82
RE: There's always succumb,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:51 AM, #83
RE: There's always succumb,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:56 AM, #84
You know what?,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 09:02 AM, #85
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Daevryn,
19-Jul-09 08:20 AM, #79
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 08:42 AM, #81
RE: Also on the subject of Nightgaunts,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 12:20 PM, #87
Evil conjie isn't that bad,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #11
Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 10:11 AM, #21
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 12:41 PM, #23
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 03:59 PM, #24
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:06 PM, #27
RE: Flawed logic.,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:20 PM, #29
RE: Flawed logic.,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:21 PM, #30
Umm,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:26 PM, #32
RE: Umm,
Habbs,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #35
Here's how I did it,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 05:02 PM, #40
I'd also add,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:27 PM, #33
RE: I'd also add,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 05:24 PM, #41
RE: I'd also add,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:31 PM, #44
RE: I'd also add,
Xanthrailles,
18-Jul-09 09:05 PM, #73
seriously,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 02:38 AM, #46
It is your responsibility to babysit the damn things.,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 07:31 AM, #47
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Nightgaunt_,
17-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #48
This is funny.,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #50
Razmorthin was ten times the player...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 01:33 AM, #54
WTF,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:23 AM, #55
Have you stated any facts that haven't been outright re...,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:36 AM, #59
RE: Have you stated any facts that haven't been outrigh...,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:08 AM, #60
RE: It is your responsibility to babysit the damn thing...,
Turing,
17-Jul-09 06:33 PM #51
You clearly don't know your stuff,
incognito,
17-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #52
Ah, the "you suck l2p argument",
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:30 AM, #56
RE: Ah, the,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:31 PM, #61
Tell you what,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 02:25 PM, #63
I'd like to see this,
Lokain,
18-Jul-09 02:49 PM, #64
I can see why it could be frustrating,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 04:11 PM, #68
RE: I'd like to see this,
Nightgaunt_,
18-Jul-09 07:27 PM, #71
RE: I'd like to see this,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 08:54 PM, #72
It's impossible not to,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 08:10 AM, #78
RE: It's impossible not to,
Nightgaunt_,
19-Jul-09 09:03 AM, #86
I'm talking about Turing, not you,
incognito,
19-Jul-09 12:23 PM, #88
RE: I'm talking about Turing, not you,
Turing,
19-Jul-09 10:34 PM, #90
RE: I'd like to see this,
Isildur,
18-Jul-09 10:59 PM, #74
RE: Tell you what,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:58 PM, #65
Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Scrimbul,
18-Jul-09 03:05 PM, #66
RE: Hold up your end of the bargain.,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 06:41 PM, #69
I think...,
Adekar,
19-Jul-09 07:04 PM, #89
I don't consider it to be "manning up",
incognito,
18-Jul-09 03:34 PM, #67
I learned more in one evil conjie than you learned in 5...,
Scrimbul,
17-Jul-09 10:10 PM, #53
Battle.net,
Turing,
18-Jul-09 02:33 AM, #57
He has, you're just too obstinate to see it.,
TMNS,
18-Jul-09 03:33 AM, #58
I hate when I'm playing a different game.,
Straklaw,
17-Jul-09 03:55 PM, #49
RE: Flawed logic.,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:28 PM, #43
Not what I'm saying either,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:24 PM, #31
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 11:54 AM, #2
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Valkenar,
15-Jul-09 02:45 PM, #3
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 05:17 PM, #6
That's not entirely true though,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 07:25 PM, #7
RE: That's not entirely true though,
Isildur,
15-Jul-09 09:31 PM, #9
Eh,
Lokain,
15-Jul-09 11:32 PM, #10
You missed the point,
Valkenar,
16-Jul-09 08:19 AM, #18
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 09:09 AM, #19
RE: You missed the point,
Nightgaunt_,
16-Jul-09 09:46 AM, #20
RE: You missed the point,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 10:43 AM, #22
And then...,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:00 PM, #25
I'd say they are not comparable,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:29 PM, #34
RE: I'd say they are not comparable,
Isildur,
16-Jul-09 08:24 PM, #45
Paths isn't needed to compare,
incognito,
18-Jul-09 01:45 PM, #62
RE: Paths isn't needed to compare,
Plushka,
18-Jul-09 07:19 PM, #70
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Nightgaunt_,
15-Jul-09 03:15 PM, #4
having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
laxman,
15-Jul-09 05:04 PM, #5
RE: having played 3 hero range evil conjies,
Daevryn,
15-Jul-09 09:14 PM, #8
Quick question then...,
Abernyte,
16-Jul-09 05:11 AM, #13
RE: Quick question then...,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:49 AM, #16
Evil conjurers with a devil vs. good conjurers with an ...,
Theerkla,
16-Jul-09 05:17 AM, #14
Archons are bad asses,
Dwoggurd,
16-Jul-09 05:35 AM, #15
RE: Archons are bad asses,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:04 PM, #26
I don't.,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:32 PM, #37
It's not as hard to kill archon-toters as claimed,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:30 PM, #36
Being a scion makes a big difference nt,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 03:34 AM, #12
Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 07:52 AM, #17
RE: Yes and no:,
Turing,
16-Jul-09 04:13 PM, #28
Agree on this one,
incognito,
16-Jul-09 04:33 PM, #38
RE: Yes and no:,
Daevryn,
16-Jul-09 06:26 PM, #42
RE: Making some classes more fun to play,
Plushka,
16-Jul-09 05:00 PM, #39
I'd settle for making trappers simply playable!,
Zizzle,
19-Jul-09 12:20 AM, #75
invokers,
Stunna,
15-Jul-09 11:38 AM, #1
RE: invokers,
Onewingedangel,
22-Jul-09 07:00 PM, #91
| |
|