|
Eskelian | Mon 21-Jun-10 02:30 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2023 posts
|     |
|
#33449, "RE: Re"
|
This is one of those cases where people should bitch on the forums and not in game. IMHO there's no room for game balance discussions in game. Maybe some basic hints at mechanics to explain why a particular strategy but outright whining about the overpoweredness of something in game is inappropriate.
|
|
|
 "Playing to win" By daervyn
[View all] , Funnyone, Thu 25-Jun-09 08:27 AM
  The article in question,
DurNominator,
22-Jun-10 10:04 AM, #26
Pretty sure some people missing an important point here...,
Tsunami,
25-Jun-09 10:12 PM, #15
Ok, here is my Valg type answer,
Dragomir,
25-Jun-09 01:09 PM, #8
RE:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 08:58 AM, #3
 Further:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 09:02 AM, #4
 It's not poker,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 09:49 AM, #5
RE: It's not poker,
Isildur,
25-Jun-09 10:22 AM, #6
RE: It's not poker,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 12:09 PM, #7
Re,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 05:33 PM, #9
This argument is too extreme.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 07:29 PM, #10
You are reinforcing the arguement.,
Theerkla,
25-Jun-09 07:48 PM, #11
There is a difference between *tactic* and *insta-win*,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 08:45 PM, #12
Slay is not insta-win,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 08:54 PM, #13
Lol.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 09:15 PM, #14
Dwoggurd's logic is impeccable here,
Vortex Magus,
25-Jun-09 11:29 PM, #16
The fact remains:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 11:41 PM, #17
RE: The fact remains:,
Sarien,
26-Jun-09 08:31 AM, #18
RE: The fact remains:,
Isildur,
26-Jun-09 10:09 AM, #19
Too specific....,
Straklaw,
27-Jun-09 03:35 AM, #20
Only if you define it one way.,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:50 PM, #23
hehhehehe,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:35 PM, #22
Or,,
Pro,
23-Jun-10 12:54 AM, #27
RE: Re,
Eskelian,
21-Jun-10 02:30 PM #24
I tap 2 mana and cast...Thread Necromancer! nt,
Artificial,
21-Jun-10 03:13 PM, #25
grass is always greener,
Terwin05,
27-Jun-09 08:57 AM, #21
RE:,
Aarn,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #2
Someone needs a nap. nt,
Splntrd,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #1
| |
|
