|
Dwoggurd | Thu 25-Jun-09 08:54 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2004
668 posts
|    |
|
#25463, "Slay is not insta-win"
|
The slay-guy has to find you and be able to execute the command.
You can hide from him, you can attack and permalag him first, etc.
So you have a chance with your sub-optimal build.
Now, go and play such a game and don't ever try whine that "slay" is cheap. Otherwise we will call you a scrub who doens't play for win or using sub-optimal tactic and never improve.
|
|
|
 "Playing to win" By daervyn
[View all] , Funnyone, Thu 25-Jun-09 08:27 AM
  The article in question,
DurNominator,
22-Jun-10 10:04 AM, #26
Pretty sure some people missing an important point here...,
Tsunami,
25-Jun-09 10:12 PM, #15
Ok, here is my Valg type answer,
Dragomir,
25-Jun-09 01:09 PM, #8
RE:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 08:58 AM, #3
 Further:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 09:02 AM, #4
 It's not poker,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 09:49 AM, #5
RE: It's not poker,
Isildur,
25-Jun-09 10:22 AM, #6
RE: It's not poker,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 12:09 PM, #7
Re,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 05:33 PM, #9
This argument is too extreme.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 07:29 PM, #10
You are reinforcing the arguement.,
Theerkla,
25-Jun-09 07:48 PM, #11
There is a difference between *tactic* and *insta-win*,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 08:45 PM, #12
Slay is not insta-win,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 08:54 PM #13
Lol.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 09:15 PM, #14
Dwoggurd's logic is impeccable here,
Vortex Magus,
25-Jun-09 11:29 PM, #16
The fact remains:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 11:41 PM, #17
RE: The fact remains:,
Sarien,
26-Jun-09 08:31 AM, #18
RE: The fact remains:,
Isildur,
26-Jun-09 10:09 AM, #19
Too specific....,
Straklaw,
27-Jun-09 03:35 AM, #20
Only if you define it one way.,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:50 PM, #23
hehhehehe,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:35 PM, #22
Or,,
Pro,
23-Jun-10 12:54 AM, #27
RE: Re,
Eskelian,
21-Jun-10 02:30 PM, #24
I tap 2 mana and cast...Thread Necromancer! nt,
Artificial,
21-Jun-10 03:13 PM, #25
grass is always greener,
Terwin05,
27-Jun-09 08:57 AM, #21
RE:,
Aarn,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #2
Someone needs a nap. nt,
Splntrd,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #1
| |
|
