Daevryn | Thu 25-Jun-09 11:41 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#25469, "The fact remains:"
|
If you play as though the game was more or less balanced and try to figure out how to beat situations that seem too powerful to you, you probably will find ways to deal with them and get better.
If your response to something that seems powerful is to call it cheap, probably you won't get better and it will keep killing you.
|
|
|
"Playing to win" By daervyn
[View all] , Funnyone, Thu 25-Jun-09 08:27 AM
The article in question,
DurNominator,
22-Jun-10 10:04 AM, #26
Pretty sure some people missing an important point here...,
Tsunami,
25-Jun-09 10:12 PM, #15
Ok, here is my Valg type answer,
Dragomir,
25-Jun-09 01:09 PM, #8
RE:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 08:58 AM, #3
Further:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 09:02 AM, #4
It's not poker,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 09:49 AM, #5
RE: It's not poker,
Isildur,
25-Jun-09 10:22 AM, #6
RE: It's not poker,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 12:09 PM, #7
Re,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 05:33 PM, #9
This argument is too extreme.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 07:29 PM, #10
You are reinforcing the arguement.,
Theerkla,
25-Jun-09 07:48 PM, #11
There is a difference between *tactic* and *insta-win*,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 08:45 PM, #12
Slay is not insta-win,
Dwoggurd,
25-Jun-09 08:54 PM, #13
Lol.,
Artificial,
25-Jun-09 09:15 PM, #14
Dwoggurd's logic is impeccable here,
Vortex Magus,
25-Jun-09 11:29 PM, #16
The fact remains:,
Daevryn,
25-Jun-09 11:41 PM #17
RE: The fact remains:,
Sarien,
26-Jun-09 08:31 AM, #18
RE: The fact remains:,
Isildur,
26-Jun-09 10:09 AM, #19
Too specific....,
Straklaw,
27-Jun-09 03:35 AM, #20
Only if you define it one way.,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:50 PM, #23
hehhehehe,
Odrirg,
28-Jun-09 03:35 PM, #22
Or,,
Pro,
23-Jun-10 12:54 AM, #27
RE: Re,
Eskelian,
21-Jun-10 02:30 PM, #24
I tap 2 mana and cast...Thread Necromancer! nt,
Artificial,
21-Jun-10 03:13 PM, #25
grass is always greener,
Terwin05,
27-Jun-09 08:57 AM, #21
RE:,
Aarn,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #2
Someone needs a nap. nt,
Splntrd,
25-Jun-09 08:43 AM, #1
| |
|