|
Daevryn | Fri 13-Feb-09 12:08 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
|     |
|
#23801, "RE: Well..."
|
>Wasn't one of the benifits you mention of new the system the
>fact that you could balance it out a bit to avoid mages
>getting location which were exceedingly more difficult for
>them in comparison to getting other locations?
Yes, but in general we did that by removing locations that are really easy for a character (for barrier especially) rather than remove locations that are really hard for a character.
Although there's also one or two of those that I think are a bit over the top and you might not see on a new character.
|
|
|
 Wand changes.
[View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
  Just give it up, don't play mages,
Valkenar,
13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
How about this...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
  RE: How about this...,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
Well...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
RE: Well...,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-09 12:08 AM #48
If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~,
Enbuergo1,
12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
It doesn't,
JMCC,
12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
RE: Wand changes.,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Baerinika ,
12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
I have no idea what you're trying to say,
Baerinika,
12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
No, no,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
We will see how things go,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up.,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
Nah, less than two now:),
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Anyone find it a positive?,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
What I find ironic,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
RE: What I find ironic,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
RE: What I find ironic,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
Pretty simple,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
RE: Pretty simple,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
I do,
DurNominator,
12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
It has nothing to do with powergaming when,
EXB,
13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
This change is bad for ragers as well,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
This already exists,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ...,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
Well, I would ask you to do me a favor...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
RE: This already exists,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Agreed,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
RE: Wand changes.,
Artificial,
11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
Reasons,
Artificial,
12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
RE: Reasons,
Isildur,
12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
Well, I am personally...,
Lightmage,
12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
You shouldn't....,
Iza,
13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
RE: You shouldn't....,
Scrimbul,
13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
| |
|
