|
JMCC | Thu 12-Feb-09 01:13 PM |
Member since 22nd Sep 2007
59 posts
|     |
|
#23781, "It doesn't"
|
I had/have a really nice character concept that I hope/hoped would go far.
However, I'm not going to relearn the wand locations.
It's creative, sure, but since preps are sooo essential to this game, it's the wrong step.
That being said, I don't have the patience/tolerance to relearn the wand locations. And I learned all my locations in 3 years from IC interactions (thank you Lightmage!)
Since protection is such a pivotal part of the game, and the change decreases my chance of getting good protections, I'll echo a lot of people's thoughts - I just don't have the patience and tolerance to adhere to this new change.
Have fun.
|
|
|
 Wand changes.
[View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
  Just give it up, don't play mages,
Valkenar,
13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
How about this...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
  RE: How about this...,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
Well...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
RE: Well...,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~,
Enbuergo1,
12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
It doesn't,
JMCC,
12-Feb-09 01:13 PM #28
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
RE: Wand changes.,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Baerinika ,
12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
I have no idea what you're trying to say,
Baerinika,
12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
No, no,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
We will see how things go,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up.,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
Nah, less than two now:),
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Anyone find it a positive?,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
What I find ironic,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
RE: What I find ironic,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
RE: What I find ironic,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
Pretty simple,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
RE: Pretty simple,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
I do,
DurNominator,
12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
It has nothing to do with powergaming when,
EXB,
13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
This change is bad for ragers as well,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
This already exists,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ...,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
Well, I would ask you to do me a favor...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
RE: This already exists,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Agreed,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
RE: Wand changes.,
Artificial,
11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
Reasons,
Artificial,
12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
RE: Reasons,
Isildur,
12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
Well, I am personally...,
Lightmage,
12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
You shouldn't....,
Iza,
13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
RE: You shouldn't....,
Scrimbul,
13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
| |
|
