Subject: "Well..." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752
Show all folders

IzaThu 12-Feb-09 11:41 PM
Member since 28th Apr 2008
54 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#23800, "Well..."


          

I am thinking of the same location you made reference to in the original posting of the wand change. It was in regards to a sleek source in a protected city and how it would not make sense for tribunals to have it. While you are correct in that it is fair game for an outlander mage, it would still have to fall under my definition of a crappy location in comparison to other possibilities.

Coincidently, that source used to belong to a set which would have probably made me 'deleted delete' my character if i ever got again. It is the reason i would never bother to search for barrier. It was one of the sets i wish would be removed and i suppose i am still wishing.

Wasn't one of the benifits you mention of new the system the fact that you could balance it out a bit to avoid mages getting location which were exceedingly more difficult for them in comparison to getting other locations? I suppose in my example it is still a matter of opinion as opposed to something more black and white like the tribunal example.

Still...~le sigh~

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicWand changes. [View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
Reply Just give it up, don't play mages, Valkenar, 13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
Reply How about this..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
Reply RE: How about this..., Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
     Reply Well..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 11:41 PM #47
          Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
Reply If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~, Enbuergo1, 12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
Reply It doesn't, JMCC, 12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
Reply RE: Wand changes., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
Reply How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
          Reply I have no idea what you're trying to say, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
          Reply No, no, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
               Reply We will see how things go, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
          Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
          Reply Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
               Reply Nah, less than two now:), MRSK, 12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Reply Anyone find it a positive?, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
Reply What I find ironic, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
Reply I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
     Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
          Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
     Reply Pretty simple, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
          Reply RE: Pretty simple, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
Reply I do, DurNominator, 12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
     Reply It has nothing to do with powergaming when, EXB, 13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
Reply This change is bad for ragers as well, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
Reply I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
Reply This already exists, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
     Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
     Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
          Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
          Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
               Reply Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ..., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
          Reply Well, I would ask you to do me a favor..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
     Reply RE: This already exists, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Reply Agreed, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Artificial, 11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
          Reply Reasons, Artificial, 12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
               Reply RE: Reasons, Isildur, 12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
                    Reply Well, I am personally..., Lightmage, 12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
                         Reply You shouldn't...., Iza, 13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
                              Reply RE: You shouldn't...., Scrimbul, 13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
     Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752 Previous topic | Next topic