Subject: "RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752
Show all folders

XanthraillesThu 12-Feb-09 11:53 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
391 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM Click to send message via ICQ
#23779, "RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system"


          

Originally everyone was using purple potions. This was the first age if I remember correctly. At the beginning of the second age mage classes were divided into necromancer, invoker, and arcane/shapeshifter. This is when the rod system initially went into place. At that time there was no sleek system, but there were three different kinds of wands. A few years later it was changed so that each character had a set of wands that were always available. This wasn't a widely known fact for years. Most people during those years complained about the fact that it was readily available.

What are people missing about today's cf compared to then? Today warriors get hp bonus, legacies, and better spec skills. The amount of damage reduction gained from wands has been reduced. Saves are much easier to gain from gear. Mage spells and affects have been toned down numerous times. If you have two equally skilled players with two very nice sets, the warrior will beat the mage almost every time. Exceptions of course being the lucky sleep necromancer or anti-paladin.

Mage classes have become much better to play in the lowbie-mid ranks. This is a HUGE improvement over the old system. Just didn't want you all to think I didn't notice.

I didn’t start the post to complain or whine about wanting the old system back. The intent of the post was to discuss whether or not we have the best system. My personal feeling is no, however I used to play a lot of mage classes. My experience with warriors is very limited, so my perspective could be skewed. That was the intent of the post

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicWand changes. [View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
Reply Just give it up, don't play mages, Valkenar, 13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
Reply How about this..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
Reply RE: How about this..., Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
     Reply Well..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
          Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
Reply If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~, Enbuergo1, 12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
Reply It doesn't, JMCC, 12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
Reply RE: Wand changes., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
Reply How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
          Reply I have no idea what you're trying to say, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
          Reply No, no, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
               Reply We will see how things go, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
          Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
          Reply Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
               Reply Nah, less than two now:), MRSK, 12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Reply Anyone find it a positive?, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
Reply What I find ironic, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
Reply I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
     Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
          Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:53 AM #26
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
     Reply Pretty simple, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
          Reply RE: Pretty simple, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
Reply I do, DurNominator, 12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
     Reply It has nothing to do with powergaming when, EXB, 13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
Reply This change is bad for ragers as well, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
Reply I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
Reply This already exists, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
     Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
     Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
          Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
          Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
               Reply Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ..., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
          Reply Well, I would ask you to do me a favor..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
     Reply RE: This already exists, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Reply Agreed, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Artificial, 11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
          Reply Reasons, Artificial, 12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
               Reply RE: Reasons, Isildur, 12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
                    Reply Well, I am personally..., Lightmage, 12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
                         Reply You shouldn't...., Iza, 13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
                              Reply RE: You shouldn't...., Scrimbul, 13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
     Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752 Previous topic | Next topic