Subject: "RE: Wand changes." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752
Show all folders

IsildurWed 11-Feb-09 09:43 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#23754, "RE: Wand changes."


          

Theoretically speaking...

1. It was supposed to remove some of the advantage of ooc-info-sharing vets, who knew where to get barrier-on-a-stick before even rolling a character. For a total newbie, finding wands is theoretically easier now (with detect artifact) than ever before.

2. Attaching more "effort" to getting wands means mages are less likely to have a/s/b up for a given fight. Or, if they insist on having it up for every fight, they're going to spend an inordinate amount of time just gathering wands, which is less time spent kicking some poor shmuck warrior's junk.

At least, that was my understanding. So, while the changes may make the game "less fun" for a vet who already knows a ton of wand locations and plays mostly mages, they theoretically make the game "more fun" for non-mages and for the players of mages who don't already know a ton of wands.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicWand changes. [View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
Reply Just give it up, don't play mages, Valkenar, 13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
Reply How about this..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
Reply RE: How about this..., Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
     Reply Well..., Iza, 12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
          Reply RE: Well..., Daevryn, 13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
Reply If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~, Enbuergo1, 12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
Reply It doesn't, JMCC, 12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
Reply RE: Wand changes., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Grudan, 12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 10:44 AM, #21
Reply How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
          Reply I have no idea what you're trying to say, Baerinika, 12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
          Reply No, no, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
               Reply We will see how things go, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
          Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
     Reply RE: How many mages have you played since the change?, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
          Reply Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
               Reply Nah, less than two now:), MRSK, 12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Reply Anyone find it a positive?, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
Reply What I find ironic, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
Reply I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
     Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
          Reply RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
Reply RE: What I find ironic, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
     Reply Pretty simple, Theerkla, 12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
          Reply RE: Pretty simple, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
Reply I do, DurNominator, 12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
     Reply It has nothing to do with powergaming when, EXB, 13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
Reply This change is bad for ragers as well, MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
Reply I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
Reply This already exists, Rayihn, 12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
     Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
     Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
          Reply RE: This already exists, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
          Reply RE: This already exists, Daevryn, 12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
               Reply Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ..., Dervish, 12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
          Reply Well, I would ask you to do me a favor..., TheLastMohican, 12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
     Reply RE: This already exists, Xanthrailles, 12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Reply Agreed, Dervish, 12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 09:43 PM #1
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Artificial, 11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
     Reply RE: Wand changes., Isildur, 11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
          Reply Reasons, Artificial, 12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
               Reply RE: Reasons, Isildur, 12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
                    Reply Well, I am personally..., Lightmage, 12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
                         Reply You shouldn't...., Iza, 13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
                              Reply RE: You shouldn't...., Scrimbul, 13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
     Reply RE: Wand changes., MRSK, 12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23752 Previous topic | Next topic