|
MRSK | Thu 12-Feb-09 10:44 AM |
Member since 06th May 2008
204 posts
|     |
|
#23774, "RE: Wand changes."
|
Let's just give up. It doesn't matter do anyone like this change exept Imms or not. The change is done and there is no way back. Too much work was implemented to just drop it. Just deal with it. Anyway this system is quite the same as before. Just wait a year or two before OOC sleek spots lists would be completed and then either get them or ask in game. Ah and something positive about the change. Now people would delete their mages at 36 not at 30 if they are screwed with bad barrier spot.
|
|
|
 Wand changes.
[View all] , Xanthrailles, Wed 11-Feb-09 07:23 PM
  Just give it up, don't play mages,
Valkenar,
13-Feb-09 11:51 AM, #50
How about this...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 09:16 PM, #44
  RE: How about this...,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 10:14 PM, #45
Well...,
Iza,
12-Feb-09 11:41 PM, #47
RE: Well...,
Daevryn,
13-Feb-09 12:08 AM, #48
If you're an Imm in the know I bet it's way more fun!~,
Enbuergo1,
12-Feb-09 05:39 PM, #36
It doesn't,
JMCC,
12-Feb-09 01:13 PM, #28
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 11:21 AM, #22
RE: Wand changes.,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:50 PM, #30
RE: Wand changes.,
Grudan,
12-Feb-09 02:24 PM, #31
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 10:44 AM #21
How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:45 PM, #29
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Baerinika ,
12-Feb-09 03:43 PM, #33
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 04:28 PM, #34
I have no idea what you're trying to say,
Baerinika,
12-Feb-09 05:02 PM, #35
No, no,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 05:52 PM, #37
We will see how things go,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 05:54 PM, #38
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 07:55 PM, #40
RE: How many mages have you played since the change?,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 06:12 PM, #39
Man Alex, you really need to lighten the #### up.,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:45 PM, #42
Nah, less than two now:),
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 09:14 PM, #43
Anyone find it a positive?,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 07:10 AM, #9
What I find ironic,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:05 AM, #11
RE: What I find ironic,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:19 AM, #13
I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 08:38 AM, #15
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:57 AM, #19
RE: I'm talking about the sleek wand system,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:53 AM, #26
RE: What I find ironic,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:37 AM, #23
Pretty simple,
Theerkla,
12-Feb-09 11:42 AM, #25
RE: Pretty simple,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:54 AM, #27
I do,
DurNominator,
12-Feb-09 02:25 PM, #32
It has nothing to do with powergaming when,
EXB,
13-Feb-09 01:26 PM, #51
This change is bad for ragers as well,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:32 AM, #7
I just don't understand why they don't make sleek sets ...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 01:12 AM, #6
This already exists,
Rayihn,
12-Feb-09 07:22 AM, #10
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:23 AM, #12
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:31 AM, #14
RE: This already exists,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:42 AM, #16
RE: This already exists,
Daevryn,
12-Feb-09 08:50 AM, #17
Mistaken, thought one mage-class does not have scrolls ...,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 08:55 AM, #18
Well, I would ask you to do me a favor...,
TheLastMohican,
12-Feb-09 08:49 PM, #41
RE: This already exists,
Xanthrailles,
12-Feb-09 11:39 AM, #24
Agreed,
Dervish,
12-Feb-09 01:08 AM, #5
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 09:43 PM, #1
RE: Wand changes.,
Artificial,
11-Feb-09 10:02 PM, #2
RE: Wand changes.,
Isildur,
11-Feb-09 11:32 PM, #3
Reasons,
Artificial,
12-Feb-09 01:02 AM, #4
RE: Reasons,
Isildur,
12-Feb-09 10:15 AM, #20
Well, I am personally...,
Lightmage,
12-Feb-09 11:37 PM, #46
You shouldn't....,
Iza,
13-Feb-09 12:25 AM, #49
RE: You shouldn't....,
Scrimbul,
13-Feb-09 01:59 PM, #52
RE: Wand changes.,
MRSK,
12-Feb-09 01:46 AM, #8
| |
|
