Subject: "Quick thought." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34649
Show all folders

TMNSWed 18-Aug-10 07:00 PM
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34735, "Quick thought."


          

>I don't know, personally, I think people would demand more information - cite the specific guideline, detail exactly how it was broken, post a log of the event where it contradicts the player's edited log, answer questions re: how allegedly similar situations are handled - all of which I think you'll agree is extremely time consuming and burdensome to respond to.<

I know I don't take kindly to being called a liar and made to seem like I'm some machiavellian genius by posting edited logs to make the playerbase fall into a line of thinking that I want. You want to accuse me of something, then please, bring proof. If you do, and you're right, I'll gladly shut the #### up. GLADLY. This whole situation pisses me off to be honest, as I got none of the response that this situation seems to have gotten. And honestly, I got worse punishments and didn't do half the cheesy #### Zathryian did. But whatever, this whole argument has again reminded me why I am glad I don't play CF anymore.

I don't think the playerbase wants a OOC fact-finding board to prove things, but by the same token, they probably won't take kindly to being slandered by someone in authority (such as certain IMMs calling players crazy for saying Nepenthe was Cabdru, various other examples that I have not the heart nor time to research and post).

That is all.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicRE: Locked Threads [View all] , Splntrd, Wed 18-Aug-10 10:50 PM
Reply Bottom line, Hopelessdwarf, 18-Aug-10 07:21 PM, #79
Reply Summary., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 03:46 PM, #48
Reply Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Knac, 18-Aug-10 04:04 PM, #49
Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:10 PM, #50
     Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Knac, 18-Aug-10 04:37 PM, #56
          Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:48 PM, #59
          Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, _Magus_, 18-Aug-10 04:52 PM, #60
               Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 05:00 PM, #62
               Reply What you guys should do in this situation.., Knac, 18-Aug-10 05:06 PM, #64
               Reply RE: What you guys should do in this situation.., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 06:01 PM, #70
               Reply I don't feel thats entirely accurate., Gaplemo, 18-Aug-10 06:42 PM, #73
               Reply You're not allowed to enter into this thread., sleepy, 19-Aug-10 12:42 AM, #84
          Reply RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse, Elerosse, 18-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #72
Reply RE: Summary., sorlag (Anonymous), 18-Aug-10 04:13 PM, #51
Reply Well thought out response, I will return mine in kind., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:24 PM, #52
     Reply Thuul, Pro, 18-Aug-10 05:46 PM, #66
     Reply RE: Thuul, Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 05:52 PM, #67
          Reply My point, Pro, 18-Aug-10 06:00 PM, #69
               Reply I'm pretty sure you already ranted about Thuul, sleepy, 19-Aug-10 12:44 AM, #85
                    Reply That wasn't the consensus. n/t, Pro, 19-Aug-10 03:57 AM, #89
                         Reply RE: That wasn't the consensus. n/t, Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 06:04 AM, #92
                              Reply No it wasn't and still isn't. n/t, Pro, 19-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #99
     Reply RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki..., _Magus_, 18-Aug-10 04:41 PM, #83
          Reply RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki..., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #58
          Reply Just to point something out..., Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 01:06 AM, #86
          Reply I actually had no idea about the title until afterwards..., TMNS, 18-Aug-10 07:07 PM, #76
Reply RE: Summary., _Magus_, 18-Aug-10 04:36 PM, #55
Reply RE: Summary., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:58 PM, #61
     Reply RE: Summary., _Magus_, 18-Aug-10 05:13 PM, #63
          Reply RE: Summary., Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 05:58 PM, #68
               Reply RE: Summary., _Magus_, 18-Aug-10 06:07 PM, #71
               Reply RE: Summary., Hutto, 19-Aug-10 02:28 PM, #97
Reply we're all human and we all make mistakes, MoetEtChandon, 18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #57
Reply FWIW, I didn't lock it and don't know who did. nt, Lyristeon, 18-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #81
Reply To be honest, you're a great IMM but a god-awful poster..., TMNS, 18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #78
Reply RE: Summary., HammerSong, 18-Aug-10 07:29 PM, #80
Reply Speaking as a newbie..., defrost, 18-Aug-10 04:20 AM, #22
Reply Define newbie, restraint, polite behavior. n/t, Pro, 18-Aug-10 10:50 AM, #32
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Malakhi, 18-Aug-10 03:29 AM, #20
Reply My reasonable alternative:, Bubthegreat, 18-Aug-10 03:59 AM, #21
Reply ... No., Splntrd, 18-Aug-10 09:52 AM, #31
     Reply RE: ... No., Bubthegreat, 18-Aug-10 02:04 PM, #40
Reply On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested., Eskelian, 18-Aug-10 08:08 AM, #23
Reply This. nt, Splntrd, 18-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #28
Reply FATALITY n/t, Pro, 18-Aug-10 01:09 PM, #38
Reply Agreement?, Malakhi, 18-Aug-10 01:45 PM, #39
Reply RE: Agreement?, Eskelian, 18-Aug-10 02:17 PM, #42
     Reply RE: Agreement?, Isildur, 18-Aug-10 10:33 PM, #82
     Reply RE: Agreement?, Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 01:13 AM, #87
     Reply RE: Agreement?, Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 06:03 AM, #91
     Reply I can't believe how much I don't agree with you these d..., Pro, 19-Aug-10 03:50 AM, #88
          Reply RE: I can't believe how much I don't agree with you the..., Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 06:02 AM, #90
               Reply Can't believe I'm defending Pro., Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 08:39 AM, #93
                    Reply RE: Can't believe I'm defending Pro., Lyristeon, 19-Aug-10 09:43 AM, #95
     Reply RE: Agreement?, Malakhi, 19-Aug-10 02:42 PM, #98
Reply RE: On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested., Isildur, 18-Aug-10 03:21 PM, #43
     Reply Think about this also, Knac, 18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #46
Reply RE: Locked Threads, ORB, 18-Aug-10 08:29 AM, #24
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Malakhi, 18-Aug-10 02:09 PM, #41
     Reply RE: Locked Threads, ORB, 18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #47
     Reply Quick thought., TMNS, 18-Aug-10 07:00 PM #75
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Hutto, 19-Aug-10 02:19 PM, #96
Reply At this point its like a bad marriage.., Kadsuane, 17-Aug-10 08:38 PM, #17
Reply Bring all the lawyers you want...I'll still get custody..., Zulghinlour, 18-Aug-10 03:26 PM, #44
     Reply Le sigh n/t , Kadsuane, 18-Aug-10 05:39 PM, #65
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Isildur, 17-Aug-10 03:33 PM, #10
Reply Correct on both accounts (n/t), Zulghinlour, 18-Aug-10 03:27 PM, #45
     Reply Fine we'll go start our own with Hookers and Blackjack!..., ORB, 18-Aug-10 04:30 PM, #54
          Reply Hookers and Blackjack eh?, Zulghinlour, 18-Aug-10 06:54 PM, #74
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Nnaeshuk, 17-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #9
Reply Some people just have long toes, MoetEtChandon, 17-Aug-10 04:47 PM, #12
Reply Totally., Guilo, 17-Aug-10 05:22 PM, #13
     Reply So duper duper cosign., TMNS, 17-Aug-10 07:13 PM, #16
          Reply Agreed, Torak, 17-Aug-10 10:44 PM, #18
Reply RE: Locked Threads, Hutto, 17-Aug-10 02:29 PM, #8
Reply RE: Locked Threads, wareagle, 17-Aug-10 01:43 PM, #7
Reply I'm all for locked threads, incognito, 17-Aug-10 01:29 PM, #5
Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Splntrd, 17-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #6
Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Anliltuel (Anonymous), 17-Aug-10 05:37 PM, #14
     Reply You could just have said it was my posts, Torak, 17-Aug-10 11:29 PM, #19
     Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Eskelian, 18-Aug-10 08:33 AM, #25
     Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Anliltuel (Anonymous), 18-Aug-10 09:01 AM, #27
          Reply You're on crack., Splntrd, 18-Aug-10 09:39 AM, #29
          Reply I didn't think it'd be too much trouble..., Anliltuel (Anonymous), 18-Aug-10 09:49 AM, #30
               Reply In retrospect..., Splntrd, 18-Aug-10 10:55 AM, #33
          Reply You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes., Pro, 18-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #34
          Reply You're not helping., Splntrd, 18-Aug-10 11:16 AM, #35
          Reply RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes..., Anliltuel (Anonymous), 18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #77
               Reply RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes..., Eskelian, 19-Aug-10 08:55 AM, #94
          Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Eskelian, 18-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #37
     Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, ORB, 18-Aug-10 08:34 AM, #26
     Reply The term 'Champion' is poorly chosen, MoetEtChandon, 18-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #53
Reply RE: I'm all for locked threads, Pendragon_Surtr, 17-Aug-10 03:43 PM, #11
Reply RE: Locked Threads, ORB, 17-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #3
Reply RE: Locked Threads, HammerSong, 17-Aug-10 06:24 PM, #15
Reply RE: Locked Threads, flatline, 17-Aug-10 12:27 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Locked Threads, sorlag (Anonymous), 17-Aug-10 12:37 PM, #2
     Reply Lyr's response to you was unwarranted., Pro, 18-Aug-10 12:49 PM, #36
     Reply RE: Locked Threads, Splntrd, 17-Aug-10 01:19 PM, #4
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34649 Previous topic | Next topic