Lyristeon | Wed 18-Aug-10 03:46 PM |
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
| |
|
#34704, "Summary."
|
Small breakdown, so you call can see that this should fall under the category of 'Nunya' (None of your business).
Part of the responsibility of an imm is to make sure no one is cheating.
I see a bunch of stuff on someone that can't use that stuff.
Question 1: Why does player have things he can't use?
Question 2: What else is this player carrying?
Question 3: Has any other imm noticed anything odd about this character in regards to possible hoarding?
Answer 1: Some people have a few items. Some claim they only have a few items. Some have enough items for an imm to think "Holy Crap!".
Answer 2: Holy Crap! (Not a few items, but well over 10 they can't use)
Answer 3: Yep!
Resolution Step 1: Discuss with the other imms about how to handle the situation.
Resolution Step 2: Find a way IC to handle it if it isn't cheating. (Perhaps a title?)
Resolution Step 3: A. Player goes with the flow, get the rp players say they want.
B. Player sends up jackass pray and forces an Imm to respond in kind.
Outcome Step 1: Player gets a TEMPORARY TITLE that can be and did get removed once he left jurisdiction. (Of course, some players do send up jackass prayers and then have the title done in a permanent way so the player can't remove it themselves.)
Outcome Step 2: Player gets nudged a little bit more harshly with a TEMPORARY REDUCTION in moves...no flaw given folks!
Outcome Step 3: A. The opportunity to rp some and perhaps get an attaboy for doing the right thing.
B. The player whines in an ooc manner with only half the story posted to try to make himself look like a victim instead of going for the rp some players have been craving for.
Now, mind you, Twist and Zulg did choose to reverse the outcome of this situation and perhaps they know the whole story or not. They have the means to check it out if they feel the need. Seeing how Twist thought that the character was being punished, I can see why he might come to that conclusion. But, he wasn't there for the discussion so he may not know all of the things that went into it beforehand.
But, I stress TEMPORARY in both parts, because that is LOGGED and was discussed before even doing the title. The rp, the title and the punishment was all hashed out before hand.
Basically, the player in question caused himself a chance to explain his motives in an IC manner by copping a bad attitude. He caused himself some sweet imm exp by thinking the worst first. He caused the bandwagon whiners to come to a conclusion that they are so far off-base upon.
I vis regularly so that people can have a higher level imm to rp with. There are many players out there who have had this opportunity since I have come back.
But, I am also extremely harsh on the whiny lamers because, for the most part, they have absolutely no idea what they are talking about. And recent events prove it yet again.
And no, we don't have to explain any reason why we do what we do to you because whether you like it or not, a huge portion of the charm of CF is the not knowing what's going on behind the green curtain.
|
|
|
RE: Locked Threads
[View all] , Splntrd, Wed 18-Aug-10 10:50 PM
Bottom line,
Hopelessdwarf,
18-Aug-10 07:21 PM, #79
Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 03:46 PM #48
Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 04:04 PM, #49
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:10 PM, #50
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 04:37 PM, #56
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:48 PM, #59
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:52 PM, #60
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:00 PM, #62
What you guys should do in this situation..,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 05:06 PM, #64
RE: What you guys should do in this situation..,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 06:01 PM, #70
I don't feel thats entirely accurate.,
Gaplemo,
18-Aug-10 06:42 PM, #73
You're not allowed to enter into this thread.,
sleepy,
19-Aug-10 12:42 AM, #84
RE: Sorry, you need to get off your high horse,
Elerosse,
18-Aug-10 06:34 PM, #72
RE: Summary.,
sorlag (Anonymous),
18-Aug-10 04:13 PM, #51
Well thought out response, I will return mine in kind.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:24 PM, #52
Thuul,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 05:46 PM, #66
RE: Thuul,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:52 PM, #67
My point,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 06:00 PM, #69
I'm pretty sure you already ranted about Thuul,
sleepy,
19-Aug-10 12:44 AM, #85
That wasn't the consensus. n/t,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 03:57 AM, #89
RE: That wasn't the consensus. n/t,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:04 AM, #92
No it wasn't and still isn't. n/t,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #99
RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki...,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:41 PM, #83
RE: Well thought out response, I will return mine in ki...,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #58
Just to point something out...,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:06 AM, #86
I actually had no idea about the title until afterwards...,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:07 PM, #76
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 04:36 PM, #55
RE: Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:58 PM, #61
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 05:13 PM, #63
RE: Summary.,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 05:58 PM, #68
RE: Summary.,
_Magus_,
18-Aug-10 06:07 PM, #71
RE: Summary.,
Hutto,
19-Aug-10 02:28 PM, #97
we're all human and we all make mistakes,
MoetEtChandon,
18-Aug-10 04:44 PM, #57
FWIW, I didn't lock it and don't know who did. nt,
Lyristeon,
18-Aug-10 04:54 PM, #81
To be honest, you're a great IMM but a god-awful poster...,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #78
RE: Summary.,
HammerSong,
18-Aug-10 07:29 PM, #80
Speaking as a newbie...,
defrost,
18-Aug-10 04:20 AM, #22
Define newbie, restraint, polite behavior. n/t,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 10:50 AM, #32
RE: Locked Threads,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 03:29 AM, #20
My reasonable alternative:,
Bubthegreat,
18-Aug-10 03:59 AM, #21
... No.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:52 AM, #31
RE: ... No.,
Bubthegreat,
18-Aug-10 02:04 PM, #40
On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested.,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 08:08 AM, #23
This. nt,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #28
FATALITY n/t,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 01:09 PM, #38
Agreement?,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 01:45 PM, #39
RE: Agreement?,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 02:17 PM, #42
RE: Agreement?,
Isildur,
18-Aug-10 10:33 PM, #82
RE: Agreement?,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 01:13 AM, #87
RE: Agreement?,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:03 AM, #91
I can't believe how much I don't agree with you these d...,
Pro,
19-Aug-10 03:50 AM, #88
RE: I can't believe how much I don't agree with you the...,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 06:02 AM, #90
Can't believe I'm defending Pro.,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 08:39 AM, #93
RE: Can't believe I'm defending Pro.,
Lyristeon,
19-Aug-10 09:43 AM, #95
RE: Agreement?,
Malakhi,
19-Aug-10 02:42 PM, #98
RE: On the offhand chance you're genuinely interested.,
Isildur,
18-Aug-10 03:21 PM, #43
Think about this also,
Knac,
18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #46
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 08:29 AM, #24
RE: Locked Threads,
Malakhi,
18-Aug-10 02:09 PM, #41
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 03:41 PM, #47
Quick thought.,
TMNS,
18-Aug-10 07:00 PM, #75
RE: Locked Threads,
Hutto,
19-Aug-10 02:19 PM, #96
At this point its like a bad marriage..,
Kadsuane,
17-Aug-10 08:38 PM, #17
Bring all the lawyers you want...I'll still get custody...,
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 03:26 PM, #44
Le sigh n/t ,
Kadsuane,
18-Aug-10 05:39 PM, #65
RE: Locked Threads,
Isildur,
17-Aug-10 03:33 PM, #10
Correct on both accounts (n/t),
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 03:27 PM, #45
Fine we'll go start our own with Hookers and Blackjack!...,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 04:30 PM, #54
Hookers and Blackjack eh?,
Zulghinlour,
18-Aug-10 06:54 PM, #74
RE: Locked Threads,
Nnaeshuk,
17-Aug-10 02:55 PM, #9
Some people just have long toes,
MoetEtChandon,
17-Aug-10 04:47 PM, #12
Totally.,
Guilo,
17-Aug-10 05:22 PM, #13
So duper duper cosign.,
TMNS,
17-Aug-10 07:13 PM, #16
Agreed,
Torak,
17-Aug-10 10:44 PM, #18
RE: Locked Threads,
Hutto,
17-Aug-10 02:29 PM, #8
RE: Locked Threads,
wareagle,
17-Aug-10 01:43 PM, #7
I'm all for locked threads,
incognito,
17-Aug-10 01:29 PM, #5
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Splntrd,
17-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #6
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Anliltuel (Anonymous),
17-Aug-10 05:37 PM, #14
You could just have said it was my posts,
Torak,
17-Aug-10 11:29 PM, #19
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 08:33 AM, #25
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Anliltuel (Anonymous),
18-Aug-10 09:01 AM, #27
You're on crack.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 09:39 AM, #29
I didn't think it'd be too much trouble...,
Anliltuel (Anonymous),
18-Aug-10 09:49 AM, #30
In retrospect...,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 10:55 AM, #33
You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes.,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #34
You're not helping.,
Splntrd,
18-Aug-10 11:16 AM, #35
RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes...,
Anliltuel (Anonymous),
18-Aug-10 07:08 PM, #77
RE: You pretty much invaidated your argument in my eyes...,
Eskelian,
19-Aug-10 08:55 AM, #94
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Eskelian,
18-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #37
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
ORB,
18-Aug-10 08:34 AM, #26
The term 'Champion' is poorly chosen,
MoetEtChandon,
18-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #53
RE: I'm all for locked threads,
Pendragon_Surtr,
17-Aug-10 03:43 PM, #11
RE: Locked Threads,
ORB,
17-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #3
RE: Locked Threads,
HammerSong,
17-Aug-10 06:24 PM, #15
RE: Locked Threads,
flatline,
17-Aug-10 12:27 PM, #1
RE: Locked Threads,
sorlag (Anonymous),
17-Aug-10 12:37 PM, #2
Lyr's response to you was unwarranted.,
Pro,
18-Aug-10 12:49 PM, #36
RE: Locked Threads,
Splntrd,
17-Aug-10 01:19 PM, #4
| |
|