permanewbie | Tue 26-Aug-03 02:02 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
349 posts
| |
|
#2095, "But back to the subject....."
|
Unfortunately (and trust me, I hate this) I somewhat agree with Vladimir.
I Know, understand, and agree with the reasoning behind the removal of quests.
That said, I think that if the Imms are going to remove quests (again, their prerogative) they should REMOVE the quest.....instead of leaving the whole quest in and just nuking the end result.
Sure, changing the end result of a known quest to a death-trap might be satisfying when the first two or three cheaters get caught (before they spread the word to stop).
But, shortly, the only people dying are newbies who have worked hard to move point by point through the quest, thinking that they are having fun....
The only thing that that accomplishes is to condition newbies to keep brief on, and to stop looking for little extras like that. Because I guarantee you, after falling for that death trap, the next time they come upon a quest they will more likely want to just ignore it.
"Death awaits ya all, wit nasteh big pointeh teeth!"
|
|
|
The changing of quests etc etc
[View all] , Vladamir, Mon 25-Aug-03 10:28 AM
I think you can design quests that aren't cheatable,
incognito,
26-Aug-03 05:26 PM, #24
Email?,
Valguarnera,
26-Aug-03 05:29 PM, #25
RE: I think you can design quests that aren't cheatable,
Circuits Edge (Anonymous),
26-Aug-03 06:18 PM, #26
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
Zulghinlour,
25-Aug-03 09:37 PM, #2
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
Vladamir,
26-Aug-03 11:12 AM, #4
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
ORB,
26-Aug-03 11:26 AM, #5
Hrm,
Rooqweaz,
26-Aug-03 11:37 AM, #6
Correction:,
Valguarnera,
26-Aug-03 12:26 PM, #7
RE: Correction:,
Nivek1,
26-Aug-03 12:48 PM, #8
Your example does not fit.,
permanewbie,
26-Aug-03 01:55 PM, #10
Guilt by association, huh?,
Nivek1,
26-Aug-03 02:02 PM, #11
Not quite.,
permanewbie,
26-Aug-03 02:05 PM, #13
Fair enough,
Nivek1,
26-Aug-03 02:14 PM, #15
Let me go at it a different way.,
permanewbie,
26-Aug-03 02:10 PM, #14
But back to the subject.....,
permanewbie,
26-Aug-03 02:02 PM #12
####,
Nightgaunt_,
26-Aug-03 02:32 PM, #17
RE: Lies.,
Valguarnera,
26-Aug-03 04:11 PM, #22
RE: Lies.,
Circuits Edge (Anonymous),
26-Aug-03 06:21 PM, #27
Good question, Circ. nt,
Nivek1,
27-Aug-03 07:47 AM, #33
Ok,
Nightgaunt_,
27-Aug-03 07:34 AM, #32
RE: Lies.,
v_vega,
28-Aug-03 07:22 AM, #41
I know who Leud's playing! nt,
Nivek1,
28-Aug-03 08:22 AM, #42
RE: Correction:,
Rooqweaz,
26-Aug-03 01:35 PM, #9
I call ####,
Zulghinlour,
26-Aug-03 03:01 PM, #18
I know you hate him and all but...,
Nightgaunt_,
26-Aug-03 03:17 PM, #20
RE: I know you hate him and all but...,
Valguarnera,
26-Aug-03 04:05 PM, #21
Ok, sorry,
Nightgaunt_,
27-Aug-03 02:53 PM, #37
RE: I call ####,
Circuits Edge (Anonymous),
26-Aug-03 06:26 PM, #28
RE,
Rooqweaz,
27-Aug-03 03:09 AM, #29
You are incorrect in one matter atleast.,
Nightgaunt_,
26-Aug-03 02:27 PM, #16
Nope.,
Valguarnera,
26-Aug-03 04:18 PM, #23
Ok, I will cry then,
Nightgaunt_,
27-Aug-03 07:25 AM, #31
What??! And some other points,
Valkenar,
27-Aug-03 01:48 PM, #34
RE: What??! And some other points,
Nivek1,
27-Aug-03 02:15 PM, #35
RE: What??! And some other points,
Valkenar,
27-Aug-03 05:02 PM, #39
Rambling last words (hopefully),
Nivek1,
28-Aug-03 02:23 PM, #46
Ok, an explanation.,
Nightgaunt_,
27-Aug-03 02:51 PM, #36
You're still wrong.,
Valguarnera,
27-Aug-03 04:22 PM, #38
Sure,
Nightgaunt_,
28-Aug-03 05:01 AM, #40
No offense Valg, but piss off.,
Chalupah,
28-Aug-03 12:52 PM, #43
I love you guys.,
Valguarnera,
28-Aug-03 01:12 PM, #44
Hey, what a surprise, I'm posting,
Nightgaunt_,
28-Aug-03 02:09 PM, #45
So are you saying...,
Gwyn,
26-Aug-03 03:11 PM, #19
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
Quislet,
25-Aug-03 09:56 PM, #1
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
Valguarnera,
25-Aug-03 09:56 PM, #3
RE: The changing of quests etc etc,
Quislet,
27-Aug-03 05:06 AM, #30
| |
|