|
#25473, "RE: Thats that"
|
>Example: If a new area comes in, it's a good bet I (and Arvam, >and others to a lesser extent) was closely associated with >making sure it has good-but-not-too-good gear, ranking is >possible if designed for such, Call of the Wild does >something, exploration experience can be earned in it, a >helpfile exists, the rooms connect properly, etc. I probably >wrote or tested some of the custom code for it. I helped >evaluate the initial idea, tried to keep it on schedule, said >"no" where needed, told people the frickin' difference between >"its" and "it's", etc. At the end of all of that, all that is >visible from the player end is maybe my name on the area's >"sign". Between adjusting new areas and maintaining old ones, >it consumes a lot of my CF time. > >I don't go publically visible at all, including when dealing >with followers/etc. Doesn't fit my character's personality, >and I prefer the style of interactions I can do from the >shadows.
Arvam still deigns to interact with his followers and cabalees, even if the time he has to do so is sometimes limited. Why do you have a religion if you don't have any time to interact with followers? This could be my naiivete, but never being publically visible because it doesn't suit your Imm's personality is a bit weak.
Just my two.
|
|
|
(DELETED) [SCION] Etarekoth Xelthzus the Chancellor of ...
[View all] , Death_Angel, Tue 16-Mar-04 08:12 PM
RE: (DELETED) [SCION] Etarekoth Xelthzus the Chancellor...,
Shadowmaster,
22-Mar-04 12:00 AM, #56
Thats that,
Romanul,
16-Mar-04 10:21 PM, #1
Glad I inducted you...,
Foslin (Guest),
16-Mar-04 10:51 PM, #2
Sure you did.,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:28 PM, #23
Lost.. Last leader weapon I saw Divox could not be sacd...,
Leadweapons (Guest),
18-Mar-04 06:54 PM, #37
Well..,
Lardovian (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:00 PM, #38
I've done most of it,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:47 PM, #42
I'm aware.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 08:17 PM, #44
RE: I'm aware.,
ORB,
22-Mar-04 12:47 AM, #57
Agreed...,
Rom (Guest),
22-Mar-04 02:52 AM, #59
From Lerrik:,
Bajula,
16-Mar-04 11:16 PM, #3
RE: Thats that,
Grurk Muouk,
16-Mar-04 11:56 PM, #4
Salute!,
Mekantos,
17-Mar-04 12:09 AM, #5
RE: Salute!,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 02:13 AM, #8
RE: Salute!,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:40 PM, #24
RE: Thats that,
Kazadan (Guest),
17-Mar-04 01:07 AM, #6
RE: Thats that,
Charade,
17-Mar-04 01:58 AM, #7
and it's time to bring forth your shadowy torch...,
Kwalin (Guest),
17-Mar-04 03:16 AM, #9
RE: Thats that,
Jyslin (Guest),
17-Mar-04 03:23 AM, #10
Heh,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:57 AM, #18
Great job,
Drokk,
17-Mar-04 03:28 AM, #11
All in a days work..the two Z's,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 03:56 AM, #12
Representing for Team Scion,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 03:57 AM, #13
The Price of Failure (Staring Tranto),
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:01 AM, #14
Kyrissa becomes Ilivarra's apprentice,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:02 AM, #15
Battle / Scion Comedy Log,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:04 AM, #16
Defence against a Paladin..,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:07 AM, #17
RE: Thats that,
Felar Serpent (Guest),
17-Mar-04 05:00 AM, #19
Rings a bell....,
Lightmaged (Guest),
17-Mar-04 06:13 PM, #20
didn't Anith get the raven form?,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:53 AM, #29
had nothing to do with being leader...,
Lightmaged (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:07 AM, #31
Oh and..,
Lightmaged (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:11 AM, #32
So long Eta,
Vorondel (Guest),
17-Mar-04 07:03 PM, #21
RE: Thats that,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:19 PM, #22
RE: Thats that,
Rom (Guest),
17-Mar-04 10:03 PM, #25
RE: Thats that,
Mekantos,
18-Mar-04 02:33 AM, #26
Hell yes.,
Romanul,
18-Mar-04 05:03 AM, #27
I agree with you completely Etarekoth...,
Foslin (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:02 AM, #28
RE: I agree with you completely Etarekoth...,
Beroxxus,
18-Mar-04 07:08 PM, #40
When have advisors done more than...um...advise?,
Wondering.. (Guest),
19-Mar-04 09:21 AM, #48
RE: When have advisors done more than...um...advise?,
Valguarnera,
19-Mar-04 02:23 PM, #50
Come on, we all know that...,
Kazadan (Guest),
19-Mar-04 04:19 PM, #51
I can't believe you could forget that...,
Mekantos,
19-Mar-04 04:42 PM, #52
That's just plain disturbing nt,
Kazadan (Guest),
19-Mar-04 09:43 PM, #54
RE: Hell yes.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 06:37 PM, #36
that's only one approach though,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:54 PM, #43
Sure.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 08:20 PM, #45
Here's what I don't get.,
Enbuergo1 (Guest),
19-Mar-04 08:51 AM, #47
Good point. I wonder what would happen...(nt),
Rom (Guest),
22-Mar-04 02:49 AM, #58
In my not so humble opinion...,
Nivek1,
20-Mar-04 12:15 AM, #55
RE: Thats that,
Arvam Follower (Guest),
18-Mar-04 08:19 AM #30
RE: Thats that,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 03:48 PM, #33
RE: Thats that,
Arvam Follower (Guest),
18-Mar-04 06:05 PM, #35
I think you're missing the point, and he's not expressi...,
Graatchman (Guest),
19-Mar-04 10:50 AM, #49
Last I checked I didn't see you,
wakeupdeadman (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:57 PM, #46
That's disappointing,
Brotmin,
19-Mar-04 09:05 PM, #53
RE: Thats that,
jaynus,
18-Mar-04 05:37 PM, #34
RE: Thats that,
Beroxxus,
18-Mar-04 07:05 PM, #39
I liked our interactions, though limited they were,
Adrigon,
18-Mar-04 07:26 PM, #41
| |
|