Valguarnera | Wed 17-Mar-04 09:19 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
| |
|
#25464, "RE: Thats that"
|
I enjoyed this character, and I thought it was a big step up from Szordrin.
I'm glad you enjoyed the cabal/area work I've done. My time is more limited recently, and I've been focusing on more administrative duties (I'm central to area management, I'm one of the three or four more active coders, etc.). I've turned over the majority of the day-to-day workings of Scion to Beroxxus, as you noticed. Since my time is limited, it's a question of what duties I can be replaced easily at vs. the ones that would be difficult to transition.
There's an odd expectation with Scion. I don't think I've seen, for example, Heralds retire and complain that Yanoreth didn't run some event for them. It takes a lot of different things to keep a MUD functioning. My contributions are all over the place by now, but I do the majority of them invisibly from a player perspective. I don't think I advertise myself as any other kind of immortal.
Example: If a new area comes in, it's a good bet I (and Arvam, and others to a lesser extent) was closely associated with making sure it has good-but-not-too-good gear, ranking is possible if designed for such, Call of the Wild does something, exploration experience can be earned in it, a helpfile exists, the rooms connect properly, etc. I probably wrote or tested some of the custom code for it. I helped evaluate the initial idea, tried to keep it on schedule, said "no" where needed, told people the frickin' difference between "its" and "it's", etc. At the end of all of that, all that is visible from the player end is maybe my name on the area's "sign". Between adjusting new areas and maintaining old ones, it consumes a lot of my CF time.
Back to your post: I have no idea why you weren't titled. I'm the worst title-r ever, but I have no explanation for why I didn't get one to you. As for Chancellor powers/perks, they're inherent to the cabal powers- all of them (except one IIRC, and I'll go add that now) "know" you're a leader. I used to give out an extra spell, but I like how these perks tie in more.
I don't go publically visible at all, including when dealing with followers/etc. Doesn't fit my character's personality, and I prefer the style of interactions I can do from the shadows.
Glad you enjoyed the area. I still laugh when I think of the initial forum posts from "experts" where they claimed there was no kewl gear inside and thus you could skip it. It's a niche area, but I like how it functions.
valguarnera@carrionfields.com
|
|
|
(DELETED) [SCION] Etarekoth Xelthzus the Chancellor of ...
[View all] , Death_Angel, Tue 16-Mar-04 08:12 PM
RE: (DELETED) [SCION] Etarekoth Xelthzus the Chancellor...,
Shadowmaster,
22-Mar-04 12:00 AM, #56
Thats that,
Romanul,
16-Mar-04 10:21 PM, #1
Glad I inducted you...,
Foslin (Guest),
16-Mar-04 10:51 PM, #2
Sure you did.,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:28 PM, #23
Lost.. Last leader weapon I saw Divox could not be sacd...,
Leadweapons (Guest),
18-Mar-04 06:54 PM, #37
Well..,
Lardovian (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:00 PM, #38
I've done most of it,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:47 PM, #42
I'm aware.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 08:17 PM, #44
RE: I'm aware.,
ORB,
22-Mar-04 12:47 AM, #57
Agreed...,
Rom (Guest),
22-Mar-04 02:52 AM, #59
From Lerrik:,
Bajula,
16-Mar-04 11:16 PM, #3
RE: Thats that,
Grurk Muouk,
16-Mar-04 11:56 PM, #4
Salute!,
Mekantos,
17-Mar-04 12:09 AM, #5
RE: Salute!,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 02:13 AM, #8
RE: Salute!,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:40 PM, #24
RE: Thats that,
Kazadan (Guest),
17-Mar-04 01:07 AM, #6
RE: Thats that,
Charade,
17-Mar-04 01:58 AM, #7
and it's time to bring forth your shadowy torch...,
Kwalin (Guest),
17-Mar-04 03:16 AM, #9
RE: Thats that,
Jyslin (Guest),
17-Mar-04 03:23 AM, #10
Heh,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:57 AM, #18
Great job,
Drokk,
17-Mar-04 03:28 AM, #11
All in a days work..the two Z's,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 03:56 AM, #12
Representing for Team Scion,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 03:57 AM, #13
The Price of Failure (Staring Tranto),
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:01 AM, #14
Kyrissa becomes Ilivarra's apprentice,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:02 AM, #15
Battle / Scion Comedy Log,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:04 AM, #16
Defence against a Paladin..,
Romanul,
17-Mar-04 04:07 AM, #17
RE: Thats that,
Felar Serpent (Guest),
17-Mar-04 05:00 AM, #19
Rings a bell....,
Lightmaged (Guest),
17-Mar-04 06:13 PM, #20
didn't Anith get the raven form?,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:53 AM, #29
had nothing to do with being leader...,
Lightmaged (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:07 AM, #31
Oh and..,
Lightmaged (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:11 AM, #32
So long Eta,
Vorondel (Guest),
17-Mar-04 07:03 PM, #21
RE: Thats that,
Valguarnera,
17-Mar-04 09:19 PM #22
RE: Thats that,
Rom (Guest),
17-Mar-04 10:03 PM, #25
RE: Thats that,
Mekantos,
18-Mar-04 02:33 AM, #26
Hell yes.,
Romanul,
18-Mar-04 05:03 AM, #27
I agree with you completely Etarekoth...,
Foslin (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:02 AM, #28
RE: I agree with you completely Etarekoth...,
Beroxxus,
18-Mar-04 07:08 PM, #40
When have advisors done more than...um...advise?,
Wondering.. (Guest),
19-Mar-04 09:21 AM, #48
RE: When have advisors done more than...um...advise?,
Valguarnera,
19-Mar-04 02:23 PM, #50
Come on, we all know that...,
Kazadan (Guest),
19-Mar-04 04:19 PM, #51
I can't believe you could forget that...,
Mekantos,
19-Mar-04 04:42 PM, #52
That's just plain disturbing nt,
Kazadan (Guest),
19-Mar-04 09:43 PM, #54
RE: Hell yes.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 06:37 PM, #36
that's only one approach though,
Daurwyn (Guest),
18-Mar-04 07:54 PM, #43
Sure.,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 08:20 PM, #45
Here's what I don't get.,
Enbuergo1 (Guest),
19-Mar-04 08:51 AM, #47
Good point. I wonder what would happen...(nt),
Rom (Guest),
22-Mar-04 02:49 AM, #58
In my not so humble opinion...,
Nivek1,
20-Mar-04 12:15 AM, #55
RE: Thats that,
Arvam Follower (Guest),
18-Mar-04 08:19 AM, #30
RE: Thats that,
Valguarnera,
18-Mar-04 03:48 PM, #33
RE: Thats that,
Arvam Follower (Guest),
18-Mar-04 06:05 PM, #35
I think you're missing the point, and he's not expressi...,
Graatchman (Guest),
19-Mar-04 10:50 AM, #49
Last I checked I didn't see you,
wakeupdeadman (Guest),
18-Mar-04 09:57 PM, #46
That's disappointing,
Brotmin,
19-Mar-04 09:05 PM, #53
RE: Thats that,
jaynus,
18-Mar-04 05:37 PM, #34
RE: Thats that,
Beroxxus,
18-Mar-04 07:05 PM, #39
I liked our interactions, though limited they were,
Adrigon,
18-Mar-04 07:26 PM, #41
| |
|