Subject: "RE: Bad Rp? Not really and here's why" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #17723
Show all folders

DogeFri 23-May-03 01:01 PM
Member since 02nd Apr 2003
117 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#17948, "RE: Bad Rp? Not really and here's why"


          

I agree. Excellent RP on both parts. It is loosely how I would picture a meeting a god of light and an dark-elf healer. I do not agree with the backpeddling charge here either. Thorny stuck to his guns which have (and should have!) a differnet morality than those of Shokai. As to the punishment... Unsure. It does seem harsh as communication is what RP is based on and to cut that out and/or force the character to somehow replace that in the environment of the text-based MUD seems too much. I am sure there was some other punishment (repeated smiting, some form of feeblemindedness for 70 ticks etc.) that would have gotten the point across. What I find odd about such a tongue cutting (it is a good visual I do admit) is that one could make, I think , a good argument that a dark god might take pleasure in such a display on Thorny's part and undo the damage. In other words, god actions (can) seem to be a one way street with the entire staff somehow on the bandwagon. To put it yet another way, there is a fine line. Immortals must have respect and be felt as real irrespective of alignment, sphere etc. But there is some RP to godliness as well that goes beyond that. This could have went in many directions including futher interaction with a dark god etc. The punishemnt might have been too much but sac'ing the necklace was a tad dense. Great log as well!

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT Topic[DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy [View all] , Thornarcrull (Guest), Mon 19-May-03 01:12 PM
Reply Couple things, Shadowmaster, 27-May-03 12:00 AM, #73
Reply RE: [DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy, Alvoroiz (Guest), 26-May-03 02:23 AM, #72
Reply Ah, craps!, Airael (Guest), 24-May-03 08:17 PM, #70
Reply Secret of the lastname (popular question), Thornarcrull (Guest), 21-May-03 10:09 AM, #62
Reply By the special request: Zharaluzar, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 11:50 AM, #53
Reply Nice run you had there., Anith (Guest), 20-May-03 09:30 AM, #48
Reply Hey!, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 11:25 AM, #51
Reply RE: [DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy, Khasotholas, 20-May-03 06:08 AM, #43
Reply RE: [DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 06:22 AM, #45
Reply sorry to see you go, penlerixid (Guest), 20-May-03 01:51 AM, #38
Reply Yep., Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 06:08 AM, #44
Reply (longish)Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy ???, Narissa, 19-May-03 10:34 PM, #32
Reply RE: (longish)Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy ???, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 05:57 AM, #42
Reply Boulwrin = Merzofyzan =, Dugruain, 19-May-03 04:08 PM, #28
Reply What I'd like to know, Dranthaax (Guest), 19-May-03 02:41 PM, #23
Reply Ha!, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 05:29 AM, #40
Reply What can I say?, Lruthlor (Guest), 19-May-03 02:08 PM, #20
Reply Well I have to say I disagree with at least one thing, Sylvrin (Guest), 19-May-03 01:57 PM, #19
Reply hasta la bye bye, shokai, 19-May-03 01:55 PM, #18
Reply I am continually amazed by..., Zulghinlour, 19-May-03 02:36 PM, #22
Reply And I'm cool with that!, Sakard, 19-May-03 03:35 PM, #25
Reply RE: I am continually amazed by..., confused (Guest), 19-May-03 03:36 PM, #26
     Reply hrm..., shokai, 19-May-03 03:48 PM, #27
     Reply RE: hrm..., Isildur, 20-May-03 12:38 AM, #35
          Reply RE: hrm..., Narissa, 20-May-03 01:06 AM, #36
          Reply Well ya see..., shokai, 20-May-03 01:22 AM, #37
               Reply RE: Well ya see..., Isildur, 20-May-03 09:59 AM, #49
                    Reply Someday I'll tell you..., Sylvrin (Guest), 20-May-03 02:28 PM, #57
     Reply A response (and a few comments for Thorn as well), nepenthe, 20-May-03 12:23 AM, #34
          Reply RE: A response (and a few comments for Thorn as well), Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 05:43 AM, #41
Reply Re: Tonguelessness:, Valguarnera, 19-May-03 04:41 PM, #29
Reply ROFL, Lruthlor (Guest), 19-May-03 04:45 PM, #30
Reply RE: ROFL...DITTO!, Sylvrin (Guest), 19-May-03 04:57 PM, #31
     Reply RE: ROFL...DITTO!, Lruthlor (Guest), 20-May-03 01:27 PM, #55
Reply RE: Re: Tonguelessness:, Vlad (Guest), 19-May-03 11:50 PM, #33
Reply RE: Yaofhil, Valguarnera, 20-May-03 02:52 AM, #39
     Reply RE: Yaofhil, Vladamir, 20-May-03 11:02 AM, #50
          Reply agreed, Sossaphrin (Guest), 20-May-03 05:36 PM, #61
Reply heh, Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 06:31 AM, #46
Reply I see your point and agree, but..., Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 11:39 AM, #52
     Reply wherein we go to the log for commentary:, shokai, 20-May-03 02:05 PM, #56
          Reply My impression, Ulthur, 20-May-03 02:32 PM, #58
          Reply This really shows, Nightgauntish (Guest), 20-May-03 03:09 PM, #59
          Reply Bad Rp? Not really and here's why, Gwyn, 20-May-03 03:35 PM, #60
               Reply RE: Bad Rp? Not really and here's why, Doge, 23-May-03 01:01 PM #63
                    Reply Now let me say why I did not like it., Nightgauntish (Guest), 23-May-03 01:55 PM, #64
                         Reply RE: Now let me say why I did not like it., nepenthe, 23-May-03 03:33 PM, #65
                              Reply But, Thornarcrull (Guest), 24-May-03 08:45 AM, #67
                                   Reply RE: But, Zulghinlour, 24-May-03 11:40 AM, #68
                                   Reply *sigh*, shokai, 24-May-03 05:18 PM, #69
                                   Reply RE: But, -TSM (Guest), 26-May-03 02:19 AM, #71
          Reply Sorry, I can't keep myself from this comment., permanewbie, 24-May-03 02:11 AM, #66
Reply RE: Note re: roles:, Valguarnera, 19-May-03 01:07 PM, #14
Reply Thank you for..., The bandwagon (Guest), 19-May-03 12:50 PM, #12
Reply I don't really think..., Thornarcrull (Guest), 19-May-03 01:06 PM, #13
     Reply RE: I don't really think..., Zulghinlour, 19-May-03 01:35 PM, #16
          Reply Yea, don't say you were the reason you got the Empire b..., Sakard, 19-May-03 03:30 PM, #24
               Reply It wasn't me! I did nothing! I HAVE NO CONNECTION TO TH..., Thornarcrull (Guest), 20-May-03 06:39 AM, #47
Reply Don't be an asss., Sassmi (Guest), 19-May-03 12:06 PM, #9
Reply But I am!, Thornarcrull (Guest), 19-May-03 12:20 PM, #11
     Reply RE: But I am!, Isildur, 19-May-03 02:10 PM, #21
Reply RE: [DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy, Lys (Guest), 19-May-03 11:35 AM, #7
Reply Um. Excuses. I wrote that in word and cut-n-pasted. Don..., Thorn-ar-Cruel (Guest), 20-May-03 11:53 AM, #54
Reply RE: [DEAD] Thornarcrull U, The Public Enemy, Zepachu, 19-May-03 10:23 AM, #5
Reply Hey Valg, this time is it really true?, Sakard, 19-May-03 09:29 AM, #4
Reply your talent is not as great as your ego, troll spotter (Guest), 19-May-03 09:26 AM, #3
Reply Doh. Screw that. I didn't mean to be such badass., Thornarcrull (Guest), 19-May-03 10:50 AM, #15
     Reply Was? I'm still alive and still kicking!, Sakard, 19-May-03 11:26 AM, #6
Reply Well I was going to say some nice things, Corealis (Guest), 19-May-03 09:03 AM, #2
Reply ok now a constructive response, heh, Corealis (Guest), 19-May-03 11:58 AM, #8
     Reply RE: ok now a constructive response, heh, Thornarcrull (Guest), 19-May-03 12:16 PM, #10
          Reply RE: ok now a constructive response, heh, Theerkla, 19-May-03 01:52 PM, #17
Reply God will roast their stomachs in hell at the hands of S..., Ulthur, 19-May-03 08:19 AM, #1
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #17723 Previous topic | Next topic