Subject: ""but I can be on you again in >under 2-3 ticks"" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #30080
Show all folders

blackbirdFri 22-Jan-10 05:46 PM
Member since 04th Sep 2009
178 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to send message via AOL IM
#30252, ""but I can be on you again in >under 2-3 ticks""


  

          

>In some cases you can teleport, but I can be on you again in
>under 2-3 ticks.
With enough stuff in your inventory and some
>luck, you might make it in this case, but frankly that's a
>much more fringe case than the 'random warrior somehow
>permalags you and out-melees you for 20 rounds despite
>everything you might do' case.

I am not understand that underlined part. Using... air shifters or an imperial shadow ally to find them? Gravesight? Or... uhh... "start spiraling out from Galadon and checking every area with particular attention to roads leading to healers"?

What I'm bad at is finding people anyway, even before we fight. If they aren't in a city/road/ranking area on Isildur's list, I'm usually at a loss and go grind gold/pick up potions.

I somehow have a feeling these two forms of hunting are related. Care to offer any insights?

EDIT: I'm wondering if you meant word, not teleport, in which case I totally get it: you'll find them in their city quickly, unless they're carrying mad gold/barter items. They're not getting rid of scourge very quickly, and they're sitting still while you're bearing down on their location.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicHow about giving melee classes a little breakwith preps... [View all] , _Magus_2 (Guest), Tue 19-Jan-10 10:16 PM
Reply Hell I would settle for just roots being returned, NMTehW (Guest), 22-Jan-10 04:54 PM, #38
Reply They always were rot death, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 05:04 PM, #39
Reply I totally disagree, Valkenar, 20-Jan-10 09:02 AM, #4
Reply RE: I totally disagree, Daevryn, 20-Jan-10 09:21 AM, #5
Reply Criteria, Valkenar, 20-Jan-10 10:39 AM, #7
     Reply RE: Criteria, Daevryn, 20-Jan-10 10:58 AM, #8
          Reply PK stats, Valkenar, 20-Jan-10 11:13 AM, #9
          Reply But then, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:26 PM, #11
               Reply RE: But then, Daevryn, 20-Jan-10 07:05 PM, #18
                    Reply I'm aware of most tactical situations, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 07:22 PM, #20
Reply Palmer? Any number of necros player by SMUG?, TMNS_lazy (Guest), 20-Jan-10 09:47 AM, #6
Reply Dying to lowbie necros, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:28 PM, #12
     Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Daevryn, 20-Jan-10 07:01 PM, #17
     Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 07:28 PM, #21
          Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Daevryn, 20-Jan-10 07:43 PM, #22
     Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Isildur, 21-Jan-10 09:24 PM, #30
          Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 04:07 AM, #31
               Reply being in the same room as someone who can perma lag = m..., quas (Guest), 22-Jan-10 06:54 AM, #32
               Reply I disagree, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 09:21 AM, #35
               Reply Right here, for the record, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 08:47 AM, #33
               Reply I'm not sure how Palmer did it, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 09:20 AM, #34
                    Reply Uhh..., Mek (Guest), 23-Jan-10 12:51 AM, #54
               Reply RE: Dying to lowbie necros, Isildur, 22-Jan-10 04:25 PM, #37
                    Reply The 2 are not the same, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 05:05 PM, #40
                         Reply RE: The 2 are not the same, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 05:15 PM, #41
                              Reply "but I can be on you again in >under 2-3 ticks", blackbird, 22-Jan-10 05:46 PM #42
                              Reply He's likely talking about, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 06:31 PM, #43
                                   Reply RE: He's likely talking about, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 08:24 PM, #44
                                        Reply RE: He's likely talking about, Isildur, 22-Jan-10 09:14 PM, #45
                                        Reply For me it is, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 09:20 PM, #48
                                        Reply What level are we talking about now?, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 22-Jan-10 09:16 PM, #46
                                        Reply RE: What level are we talking about now?, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 09:48 PM, #49
                                        Reply What level are you talking about?, Valkenar, 22-Jan-10 09:18 PM, #47
                                             Reply RE: What level are you talking about?, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 09:50 PM, #50
                                                  Reply Huh. Okay, Valkenar, 22-Jan-10 11:22 PM, #52
                                                       Reply RE: Huh. Okay, Daevryn, 22-Jan-10 11:43 PM, #53
                              Reply Don't forget!, TMNS_lazy (Guest), 22-Jan-10 10:43 PM, #51
Reply uh its the player son not the build, quas (Guest), 20-Jan-10 05:58 PM, #10
     Reply So what you are saying is, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:29 PM, #13
          Reply yes, quas (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:47 PM, #16
               Reply I can tell you now, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 07:13 PM, #19
               Reply RE: I can tell you now, quas (Guest), 20-Jan-10 08:00 PM, #23
                    Reply I used teleport A LOT both to hunt and to escape..., Kaer (Guest), 21-Jan-10 02:24 AM, #24
                    Reply Three reasons to care about mob deaths, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 21-Jan-10 02:01 PM, #25
                         Reply RE: Three reasons to care about mob deaths, quas (Guest), 21-Jan-10 05:54 PM, #26
                              Reply I understand your argument, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 21-Jan-10 06:15 PM, #27
                              Reply I understand your argument, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 21-Jan-10 06:15 PM, #28
                                   Reply No idea why that posted twice, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 21-Jan-10 06:17 PM, #29
               Reply But, Amused (Guest), 22-Jan-10 12:50 PM, #36
Reply or you can accept that warriors != mages, quas (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:58 AM, #3
Reply I'm not sure Wuuble is a good example, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:31 PM, #14
     Reply Would say though, Daurwyn2 (Guest), 20-Jan-10 06:32 PM, #15
Reply RE: How about giving melee classes a little breakwith p..., Daevryn, 19-Jan-10 10:17 PM, #1
     Reply RE: How about giving melee classes a little breakwith p..., Asyguest (Guest), 20-Jan-10 12:55 AM, #2
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #30080 Previous topic | Next topic