|
Abernyte | Mon 30-Mar-09 09:56 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
973 posts
|     |
|
#24209, "On Golems, mummies, zombies and ghouls"
|
Do these brainless being ever fail to rescue the necromancer or the person the necromancer commands them to rescue? I ask because warriors and paladins often fail in their attempts but I have never seen one of these brainless undead ever fail.
If they don't ever fail to rescue, why not? Shouldn't there always be a chance of failure in skills that involve people meleeing about?
It kind of detracts from the warrior's skills set if a brainless pile of embalmed flesh can rescue people better than he can.
-----Abernyte
P.S. If you cannot make it fail sometimes, at least have them accidently pass on plague to the rescued by virtue of the close proximity they are under.
|
|
|
 On Golems, mummies, zombies and ghouls
[View all] , Abernyte, Mon 30-Mar-09 09:56 AM
  Try this.,
Scrimbul,
31-Mar-09 03:05 AM, #5
 RE: Try this.,
Daevryn,
31-Mar-09 07:43 AM, #6
 To be fair I'm not that far along in my C.,
Scrimbul,
31-Mar-09 03:02 PM, #8
This is such a great idea.,
Guilo,
01-Apr-09 10:29 AM, #9
I agree. Remove 'order all rescue'. Or change it so onl...,
Marcus_,
31-Mar-09 01:53 AM, #2
I don't think necromancers need their charmie's strengt...,
Mekantos,
31-Mar-09 02:06 AM, #3
I agree with this.,
Scrimbul,
31-Mar-09 02:59 AM, #4
Then remove the failure rate.,
Marcus_,
31-Mar-09 02:51 PM, #7
They can fail,
Mekantos,
30-Mar-09 10:16 AM, #1
| |
|
