Knac | Mon 05-Jan-15 06:34 PM |
Member since 07th May 2010
202 posts
| |
|
#57632, "RE: To be honest -250 imm exp isn't much."
|
Yea, I agree, -250 imm xp is not much. Practically, it won't have a huge detrimental impact on my character (this is me personally - I'm fairly confident in my abilities that I can easily rectify that somehow). But realistically, it links my character to a negative attribution that will likely affect my character someway in the future. At least, that's how I feel - it may not be true, and maybe I'm the minority, but I don't think I'm the minority.
Coming from the player side, what I'm getting is that people think that this punishment is disproportional to the violation. IE the violation is not egregious enough to warrant getting the -imm xp. And this arose from the fact that a) observation/exploration xp for edge points has changed and b) this appears to be something NEW that's happening, and it started happening without the players noticing it.
Essentially, the -imm xp was a surprise that added to an arguably hugely disfavorable change to the game.
Notwithstanding the disfavorable changes (which is up to the imms - I'm not touching that, nor do I particularly care), before putting the -XP hammer down (and I don't think that just because imms are awarding more xp necessitates creating more situations of subtracting xp - these are different issues), I'd suggest having some mechanism to track violations (maybe a databank where imms put in various violations that they see). It's being done anyways in a way for each character's PBF. If it becomes a common problem, put an announcement in stating that this is the official stance and these are the penalties. Don't leave it open for discussion. That way there's no "surprise" when it comes to detrimental effects on players.
I said this once before, and I'll say it again. You guys should get someone to be in charge of public relations concerns. There are those naysayers among the players who are just douches, ####s, and wants to point fingers at one of the imms for every single insignificant affronts that they perceive is being done to them (or not even them - they just like to argue), but generally, I think the playerbase is more mature than those people.
|
|
|
PSA: Descriptions
[View all] , Akresius, Mon 05-Jan-15 10:38 PM
Had you never docked imm exp this would never have beco...,
TJHuron,
06-Jan-15 01:04 PM, #52
Didn't Mean to Kick the Beehive,
Saagkri,
06-Jan-15 08:02 AM, #46
RE: Didn't Mean to Kick the Beehive,
Demos,
06-Jan-15 08:06 AM, #47
Good post n/t,
TJHuron,
06-Jan-15 12:46 PM, #51
Fine,
incognito,
06-Jan-15 05:10 AM, #45
To the players below (let's try a different approach he...,
Mendos,
06-Jan-15 02:24 AM, #42
Reward originality.,
ibuki,
06-Jan-15 03:35 AM, #43
In case it isn't (broadly) known, originality is alread...,
Mendos,
06-Jan-15 03:50 AM, #44
Don't look now,
Ysaloerye,
06-Jan-15 11:27 AM, #50
RE: To the players below (let's try a different approac...,
Tac,
06-Jan-15 09:08 AM, #48
I want to feel bad for you (because you're cool) but I ...,
TMNS,
05-Jan-15 09:18 PM, #31
What "arms race" do you refer to?,
Mendos,
06-Jan-15 02:21 AM, #41
Long/short of it..,
TMNS,
06-Jan-15 01:24 PM, #53
Descriptions,
Umiron,
05-Jan-15 08:24 PM, #30
RE: Descriptions,
Tac,
05-Jan-15 08:46 PM, #39
I don't think your post here is helpful,
Humbert,
05-Jan-15 09:37 PM, #32
RE: I don't think your post here is helpful,
Tac,
05-Jan-15 10:01 PM, #34
RE: I don't think your post here is helpful,
Humbert,
05-Jan-15 10:11 PM, #35
Ineffective.,
Valguarnera,
05-Jan-15 10:22 PM, #37
RE: Ineffective.,
Humbert,
05-Jan-15 10:26 PM, #38
You guys need to stop,
Knac,
05-Jan-15 09:48 PM, #33
Exactly this. ,
Humbert,
05-Jan-15 10:21 PM, #36
Immortals are Doing a Great Job,
Amora,
05-Jan-15 06:11 PM, #23
Personally...,
TheBluestThumb,
05-Jan-15 05:50 PM, #16
I've agreed with every word you've posted in this threa...,
Artificial,
05-Jan-15 05:40 PM, #13
Of course you do.,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 06:13 PM, #24
Over reactions,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 05:37 PM, #11
RE: Over reactions,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:47 PM, #14
RE: Over reactions,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 06:01 PM, #20
It seems like the staff has been overzealous in 'enforc...,
Lhydia,
05-Jan-15 04:44 PM, #3
RE: It seems like the staff has been overzealous in 'en...,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:19 PM, #6
No. And I'd say sorry you're so jaded but the attitude ...,
Lhydia,
05-Jan-15 05:19 PM, #9
Rotd & description room,
Demos,
05-Jan-15 11:42 PM, #40
RE: It seems like the staff has been overzealous in 'en...,
Deaer (Anonymous),
05-Jan-15 05:17 PM, #8
Caldysias and Baelen weren't a perma dude. NT,
TMNS,
05-Jan-15 05:31 PM, #10
I didn't catch everyone.,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:51 PM, #18
is the juice worth the squeeze,
laxman,
05-Jan-15 04:25 PM, #1
Removing multicharing and permagrouping rules would sav...,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 04:31 PM, #2
That doesn't really answer the question.,
Tac,
05-Jan-15 04:51 PM, #4
I wouldn't think those are good comparisons,
laxman,
05-Jan-15 05:01 PM, #5
An easy way to hand out xp is for solid descriptions.,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:15 PM, #7
Consequence,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 05:40 PM, #12
RE: Consequence,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:49 PM, #15
It's not?,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 06:06 PM, #21
There's the disconnect.,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 06:22 PM, #25
Not really.,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 06:34 PM, #26
RE: Not really.,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 06:43 PM, #28
For sure.,
Tsunami,
05-Jan-15 08:14 PM, #29
RE: An easy way to hand out xp is for solid description...,
Knac,
05-Jan-15 05:50 PM, #17
RE: An easy way to hand out xp is for solid description...,
Akresius,
05-Jan-15 05:55 PM, #19
To be honest -250 imm exp isn't much.,
Deaer (Anonymous),
05-Jan-15 06:10 PM, #22
RE: To be honest -250 imm exp isn't much.,
Knac,
05-Jan-15 06:34 PM #27
This is rather relevatory,
laxman,
06-Jan-15 10:41 AM, #49
| |
|