Subject: "RE: woot! Flame on!!" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4555
Show all folders

ChalupahMon 07-Jun-04 09:48 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
139 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4701, "RE: woot! Flame on!!"


          

I like how you guys added the 'no flaming' forum rule.

>>
>>>We constantly fiddle with things here at Carrion Fields.
>>>Whether you realize it or not, it's why you're here at all.
>
>>>For years, lots of commercial games used a model of putting
>>>out their best product on Day One, watching it sell many
>>>copies, get good reviews, then gradually fade into
>obscurity
>>>as people got bored of the same-old-same-old. More
>>recently,
>>>you see a lot of games which operate under the model we do:
>>>releasing expansions, free downloads, and creating tools to
>>>allow other people to generate even more.
>>>
>>
>>The model you're using as an example is NOT the same model
>you
>>use.
>>
>>We only need new content, not new features.
>
>I could be smarmy and say Guess I'll stop working on those
>new classes/races/cabals. No new features...got it. I'll
>just keep going on for bug fixes & new areas
.
>
>

classes/races/cabals are content. That's what I'm asking for.
areas are content. Ditto.

It's part of the bigger platform I'm trying to push here.

(Why do you word things like that? You're allowed to flame me, but I'm not allowed to flame you? C'mon, buddy. I can take it.)


>>Hi. We have no way of knowing if everyone would have
>>departed, Nostradamus. Code and Areas are Features and
>>Content. This is going to be a recurring theme in this
>flame.
>> Because I genuinely think you don't get it.

>And all you want is content? All you want is new areas? I
>find that amazingly hard to believe, but it's your opinion.
>And if that is all you want...then you don't get it. CF is an
>ever-evolving game of features and content. It always will
>be. This is not a stagnant environment.

Zulgh look, take this statement, this is the base for this idea.

Immortals have often pointed out that they put a lot of work into CF.

I think the implication is that you do not enjoy 'working' on CF, right? I seriously LIKE the immortals. I'm trying to point out that maybe you don't HAVE to work at CF. I'm trying to make your life easier? Why .. would you argue against me?

It's not a flame..

>CF is an
>ever-evolving game of features and content. It always will
>be. This is not a stagnant environment.

That's why I like muds. But why is it all or nothing? Why wouldn't quests and immteraction keep the mud fresh? Why wouldn't player RP keep the mud fresh?

Look.. all you have to do to prove me wrong is give me a good answer to any of these questions. They aren't rhetorical. I'm trying to drive an intelligent discussion by pointing out what I don't understand.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicPontification: Change Fearers [View all] , Valguarnera, Mon 07-Jun-04 08:56 PM
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Xaannix, 17-Jun-04 07:10 PM, #35
Reply Change is not the problem., Xaannix, 17-Jun-04 07:00 PM, #34
Reply I have pehaps a unique view on this, Abthalok, 08-Jun-04 10:55 AM, #30
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Nightgaunt_, 17-May-04 02:12 PM, #19
Reply About Outlanders (since you mentioned them), Jarvino, 17-May-04 06:39 PM, #6
Reply Outlanders, Zanya, 18-May-04 04:54 PM, #12
Reply Response., Lyristeon, 09-Jun-04 10:22 AM, #32
Reply woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 08:22 PM, #18
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 09:05 PM, #22
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 09:48 PM #23
     Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 10:16 PM, #24
          Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 11:12 PM, #25
               Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 11:21 PM, #26
                    Reply I'm not trying to be difficult, I swear., Chalupah, 08-Jun-04 12:31 AM, #27
                         Reply RE: I'm not trying to be difficult, I swear., Zulghinlour, 08-Jun-04 12:57 AM, #28
                              Reply Two points for using onus in a sentence and not soundin..., Shadowmaster, 08-Jun-04 08:08 AM, #29
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Valguarnera, 09-Jun-04 09:09 AM, #31
Reply Just a few thoughts., Lyristeon, 09-Jun-04 10:43 AM, #33
Reply Good post (small text), Soren, 28-May-04 01:30 PM, #17
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:24 PM, #14
Reply Didn't read your post, but "Trust" sums it up., Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:09 PM, #13
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Romanul, 17-May-04 11:31 PM, #7
Reply Assassins, nepenthe, 18-May-04 12:00 AM, #8
     Reply RE: Assassins, Romanul, 18-May-04 04:57 AM, #10
Reply Orb Ramblings, ORB, 17-May-04 12:48 PM, #5
Reply Change Fearing vrs Constructive Critiscism, General_Malaise, 17-May-04 10:43 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Change Fearing vrs Constructive Critiscism, incognito, 17-May-04 11:31 AM, #2
     Reply Regarding Scion:, Valguarnera, 17-May-04 11:51 AM, #3
     Reply RE: Regarding Scion:, Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:30 PM, #15
     Reply Regarding Criticism:, Valguarnera, 17-May-04 12:11 PM, #20
          Reply Great post, and a response., Shadowmaster, 17-May-04 12:34 PM, #4
          Reply regarding flee/sleep, incognito, 18-May-04 03:23 AM, #9
               Reply regarding enhanced reactions, incognito, 18-May-04 07:01 AM, #11
                    Reply Come on, (NOT Graatch), 18-May-04 05:24 PM, #21
                         Reply RE: Come on, incognito, 18-May-04 06:29 PM, #16
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4555 Previous topic | Next topic