Subject: "Assassins" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4555
Show all folders

nepentheTue 18-May-04 12:00 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#4567, "Assassins"


          


>Well, I guess my beef is that assassins have not recieved any
>positive changes. Let us take the vanish change, a rather huge
>change. Why was it changed? Was it because:

I believe I've talked about this before, but perhaps you missed it:

Back in the day when I started playing the game, vanish failed in the situation(s) it can fail now. It did so much more than it does currently.

Around the time assassins were revamped, Cador and I talked about increasing its success rate in that situation, and he did.

We later discovered that by "increased success rate" he had actually meant "zero chance of failure." This was then retrofited to have the kind of success rate I/we had in mind when it was improved in the first place. So, whether you are aware of it or not, what you are seeing is not a huge nerf, but a small nerf to an earlier HUGE improvement. Assassins still came out way ahead on that.

> My
>primary beef with the change was that an excellent use of
>vanish was to escape entwine.

That hasn't changed. Instead of having a 0% chance to escape entwine, vanish does allow an assassin to have an x% chance, where x should generally be greater than 50% and less than 100%. It's up to you to decide whether you like your chances of succeeding at a vanish or if you think you have a better chance trying to escape or stay with a different tactic. You roll the dice and you take your chances. This is generally makes for a more interesting game than one in which the superiority of the vanish vs. entwine tactic is absolutely assured.

> b) Vanish succeeded 100% of the time when perfected?
> - Word of Recall succeededs 100% of the time when perfected
>*shrug*

There are also more ways to make word of recall succeed 0% when perfected than there are to do the same to vanish.

>Though, truth be told, I wouldn't have been as annoyed with
>the change if assassins had recieved something positive. Sort
>of a give-and-take type of deal. Who knows, maybe its just
>more fun coding up more and more (and more!) #### for
>warriors, or maybe there is no immortal who is interested in
>coding up new assassin stuff.

I'm sure assassins will get more attention someday. Currently, they're certainly not a weak class.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicPontification: Change Fearers [View all] , Valguarnera, Mon 07-Jun-04 08:56 PM
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Xaannix, 17-Jun-04 07:10 PM, #35
Reply Change is not the problem., Xaannix, 17-Jun-04 07:00 PM, #34
Reply I have pehaps a unique view on this, Abthalok, 08-Jun-04 10:55 AM, #30
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Nightgaunt_, 17-May-04 02:12 PM, #19
Reply About Outlanders (since you mentioned them), Jarvino, 17-May-04 06:39 PM, #6
Reply Outlanders, Zanya, 18-May-04 04:54 PM, #12
Reply Response., Lyristeon, 09-Jun-04 10:22 AM, #32
Reply woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 08:22 PM, #18
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 09:05 PM, #22
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 09:48 PM, #23
     Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 10:16 PM, #24
          Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Chalupah, 07-Jun-04 11:12 PM, #25
               Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Zulghinlour, 07-Jun-04 11:21 PM, #26
                    Reply I'm not trying to be difficult, I swear., Chalupah, 08-Jun-04 12:31 AM, #27
                         Reply RE: I'm not trying to be difficult, I swear., Zulghinlour, 08-Jun-04 12:57 AM, #28
                              Reply Two points for using onus in a sentence and not soundin..., Shadowmaster, 08-Jun-04 08:08 AM, #29
Reply RE: woot! Flame on!!, Valguarnera, 09-Jun-04 09:09 AM, #31
Reply Just a few thoughts., Lyristeon, 09-Jun-04 10:43 AM, #33
Reply Good post (small text), Soren, 28-May-04 01:30 PM, #17
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:24 PM, #14
Reply Didn't read your post, but "Trust" sums it up., Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:09 PM, #13
Reply RE: Pontification: Change Fearers, Romanul, 17-May-04 11:31 PM, #7
Reply Assassins, nepenthe, 18-May-04 12:00 AM #8
     Reply RE: Assassins, Romanul, 18-May-04 04:57 AM, #10
Reply Orb Ramblings, ORB, 17-May-04 12:48 PM, #5
Reply Change Fearing vrs Constructive Critiscism, General_Malaise, 17-May-04 10:43 AM, #1
     Reply RE: Change Fearing vrs Constructive Critiscism, incognito, 17-May-04 11:31 AM, #2
     Reply Regarding Scion:, Valguarnera, 17-May-04 11:51 AM, #3
     Reply RE: Regarding Scion:, Evil Genius (Anonymous), 18-May-04 05:30 PM, #15
     Reply Regarding Criticism:, Valguarnera, 17-May-04 12:11 PM, #20
          Reply Great post, and a response., Shadowmaster, 17-May-04 12:34 PM, #4
          Reply regarding flee/sleep, incognito, 18-May-04 03:23 AM, #9
               Reply regarding enhanced reactions, incognito, 18-May-04 07:01 AM, #11
                    Reply Come on, (NOT Graatch), 18-May-04 05:24 PM, #21
                         Reply RE: Come on, incognito, 18-May-04 06:29 PM, #16
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #4555 Previous topic | Next topic