Subject: "Did you say something new?" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546
Show all folders

ElerosseFri 13-Aug-10 04:14 PM
Member since 01st Nov 2006
423 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34600, "Did you say something new?"


          

>You said "we can only guess at what would happen". I don't
>need to guess. I know what would happen because :
>
>1) CF's rules used to be looser than they are now, as was the
>playerbases's attitude.

Those were different days with more players. And as you state players attitudes were different. You can't know what exactly would happen with today's players. And stating that you KNOW what would happen just makes you look silly.

>2) There are a million other games where your doomsday
>scenarios just don't happen.

I never said it was a doomsday scenario. I said I do not want the rule changed because I can conceive of problems that it would cause with the way I play and enjoy the game, one of which is that I feel it would be harder to find groups for people (such as myself) that do not want to form them ooc. How else should I comment on a suggested rule change except through my own perceptions of what a rule change would mean to me?

Obviously you think it would benefit you, it probably would because I would imagine you have a group of ooc friends that play. I am not arguing against that, I am just saying this rule change would make the game less fun for me. I have not heard anything in the arguments for changing the rule that would make me think otherwise.

>So don't deflect onto "that's not the game I want it to be".

Umm, why not? This is a discussion about a rule change. What angle would you propose taking other then changing this rule moves the game in a direction I would not like. How is your argument that other games that allow ooc groups and so should CF any different? Are you not just arguing "that's how I want the game to be"? Seriously what the hell are you trying to say?



>So the slippery slope argument just doesn't hold water.

I didn't say this would lead to the doom of CF. You just keep bring up the fact that other games allow for more ooc grouping/communication and CF should be like them. I simply tried to point out that it is unlikely that those games are good comparisons to CF. Your only proof is that at a point over 10 years ago when the game was vastly different it didn't have problems, which is false and is why the rules were changed in the first place.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicSo it's been a week.... [View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Reply Well, Valkenar, 13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Reply Non sequitur, The Heretic, 13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
Reply not everyone thinks a change would be good., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Reply Seconded... (n/t), yr_blues, 13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
Reply There's a few problems with your argument, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
     Reply the problem is.., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
          Reply But see, I don't have to guess., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
               Reply i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
                         Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
                              Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
                    Reply Your deflection fails., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
                         Reply Did you say something new?, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:14 PM #50
                              Reply FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
     Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
          Reply i can agree here, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
Reply So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #8
     Reply The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
          Reply Give me examples, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
          Reply welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
          Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
               Reply Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Twist, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
                         Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
                    Reply I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
                         Reply RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
                              Reply I say personally, I'm an IMP..., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
                    Reply I can vouch for this., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
                         Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
                              Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
                              Reply Oh, I know., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
               Reply So...., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
               Reply This pretty much sums it up for me, Zulghinlour, 13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
               Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
                    Reply Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
                              Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
                                   Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
                                        Reply Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
                                             Reply RE: Ugh, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
                                                  Reply RE: Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Reply Why respond?, Asthiss, 13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
Reply I aggree....small text, Behnistek, 13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
     Reply you are beating a dead horse, laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546 Previous topic | Next topic