Subject: "Ignoring Torak's posts, then:" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546
Show all folders

TwistFri 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#34566, "Ignoring Torak's posts, then:"


          

You, Eskelian, likely have nothing to worry about. Because if we thought you were involved in this same sort of shady activity, the first thing that would happen would be a warning. Which is exactly what happened to most of the aforementioned Hell group.

Torak and Artificial got denied due to it being a repeat offense.

Tweedster got slain/purged and de-empowered due to using people that he admitted to speaking with OOC to achieve the goal of getting to Satan. It was fairly clear to me that this was a pre-planned thing prior to character creation.

The players in question do have quite a history of rule breaking. This was a huge factor in the punishment. There were 4-5 other characters who were given a warning. One was unfortunately left in the Realm of the Dead longer than I wanted, because I was unable to find him, and so instead I spelled out the warning to him in an email and had him moved out of the RotD offline so he could go back to playing.

You have allowed Torak and Artificial to make you their Champion in this...whether you are just wanting to be argumentative or not. The bottom line is repeat-offenders who broke a rule got denied for that rule. First time offenders would not have been denied. And BECAUSE the rule is vague, when I talk to people about it, I TALK to them. Many of the "other permas" that people like to speak of on these forums have had that talk. But that is between them and the Immortal staff. That talk has changed at least one of their play patterns, for the better. More than one, in fact, that I can think of.

The rule does not need to be changed, nor does the wording.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy

HOT Locked TopicSo it's been a week.... [View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
Reply Well, Valkenar, 13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Reply Non sequitur, The Heretic, 13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
Reply not everyone thinks a change would be good., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
Reply Seconded... (n/t), yr_blues, 13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
Reply There's a few problems with your argument, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
     Reply the problem is.., Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
          Reply But see, I don't have to guess., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
               Reply i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
                    Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
                         Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
                              Reply RE: i forgot you know everything, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
                    Reply Your deflection fails., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
                         Reply Did you say something new?, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
                              Reply FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
     Reply RE: So it's been a week...., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
          Reply i can agree here, Elerosse, 13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
Reply So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #8
     Reply The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
          Reply Give me examples, Torak, 13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
          Reply welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your..., laxman, 13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
          Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
               Reply Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Twist, 13-Aug-10 11:47 AM #18
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
                    Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
                         Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
                    Reply I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
                         Reply RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering..., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
                              Reply I say personally, I'm an IMP..., Twist, 13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
                    Reply I can vouch for this., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
                         Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Eskelian, 13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
                              Reply RE: I can vouch for this., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 03:07 PM, #47
                              Reply Oh, I know., Splntrd, 13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
               Reply So...., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
               Reply This pretty much sums it up for me, Zulghinlour, 13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
               Reply RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
               Reply RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ..., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
                    Reply Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
                         Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
                              Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
                                   Reply RE: Always the history comment.., Lyristeon, 13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
                                        Reply Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
                                             Reply RE: Ugh, sorlag (Anonymous), 13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
                                                  Reply RE: Ugh, Torak, 13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Reply Why respond?, Asthiss, 13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
Reply I aggree....small text, Behnistek, 13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
     Reply you are beating a dead horse, laxman, 13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #34546 Previous topic | Next topic