Lyristeon | Fri 13-Aug-10 03:07 PM |
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
|    |
|
#34596, "RE: I can vouch for this."
|
The rule, which is pretty much enforced would have to be vague and take player history into account. Which is what we do. There is no clear definitive rule and there shouldn't be in regards to cheating.
|
|
|
 So it's been a week....
[View all] , Torak, Fri 13-Aug-10 02:40 AM
  Well,
Valkenar,
13-Aug-10 12:40 PM, #35
Non sequitur,
The Heretic,
13-Aug-10 11:42 AM, #15
not everyone thinks a change would be good.,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 10:42 AM, #6
 Seconded... (n/t),
yr_blues,
13-Aug-10 10:46 AM, #7
 There's a few problems with your argument,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:13 AM, #9
the problem is..,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 11:48 AM, #16
But see, I don't have to guess.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #17
i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:23 PM, #27
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 01:37 PM, #42
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 02:27 PM, #43
RE: i forgot you know everything,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 03:05 PM, #46
RE: i forgot you know everything,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:25 PM, #51
Your deflection fails.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:24 PM, #49
Did you say something new?,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 04:14 PM, #50
FYI I'm not talking about 10 years ago or vastly more p...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 04:31 PM, #52
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:23 AM, #3
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 09:34 AM, #4
RE: So it's been a week....,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 09:45 AM, #5
RE: So it's been a week....,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:21 AM, #12
i can agree here,
Elerosse,
13-Aug-10 12:21 PM, #33
So that means you basically like enforcing on a whim,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:05 AM, #8
The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, you ...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:14 AM, #10
Give me examples,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 11:27 AM, #13
welcome to the digital age where you cannot escape your...,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 12:50 PM, #37
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:28 AM, #14
Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 11:47 AM, #18
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 11:55 AM, #20
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:00 PM, #21
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:06 PM, #23
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:08 PM, #
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #25
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #31
I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering.,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:12 PM, #26
RE: I'd suggest emailing the IMPs when you're wondering...,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 12:15 PM, #29
I say personally, I'm an IMP...,
Twist,
13-Aug-10 12:19 PM, #32
I can vouch for this.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 02:52 PM, #44
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Eskelian,
13-Aug-10 03:01 PM, #45
RE: I can vouch for this.,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 03:07 PM #47
Oh, I know.,
Splntrd,
13-Aug-10 03:11 PM, #48
So....,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:03 PM, #22
This pretty much sums it up for me,
Zulghinlour,
13-Aug-10 12:48 PM, #36
RE: Ignoring Torak's posts, then:,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:53 PM, #39
RE: The rules seem clearly defined for 95% of players, ...,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 11:51 AM, #19
Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:11 PM, #24
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:14 PM, #28
RE: Always the history comment..,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:18 PM, #30
RE: Always the history comment..,
Lyristeon,
13-Aug-10 12:28 PM, #34
Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 12:51 PM, #38
RE: Ugh,
sorlag (Anonymous),
13-Aug-10 12:59 PM, #40
RE: Ugh,
Torak,
13-Aug-10 01:11 PM, #41
Why respond?,
Asthiss,
13-Aug-10 09:19 AM, #2
I aggree....small text,
Behnistek,
13-Aug-10 03:34 AM, #1
you are beating a dead horse,
laxman,
13-Aug-10 11:15 AM, #11
| |
|
