Subject: "RE: Is the second point correct?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #16834
Show all folders

IsildurMon 05-Mar-07 06:44 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
5969 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16896, "RE: Is the second point correct?"


          

I highly suspect it's the latter. Otherwise you'd see skills like "magic armor use" and "elemental armor use", corresponding to "magical" and "elemental" attack types respectively.

Plus check out the helpfile for "mystical armor use". Seems like it boosts the effectiveness of gear made from energy, fire, water, etc.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicNew armor/hit stuff [View all] , Nivek1, Sun 04-Mar-07 02:22 PM
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 12-Mar-07 01:47 PM, #52
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 12-Mar-07 11:47 PM, #53
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 13-Mar-07 04:35 PM, #54
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 13-Mar-07 04:39 PM, #55
               Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 13-Mar-07 08:32 PM, #56
                    Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 14-Mar-07 07:04 AM, #57
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Eskelian, 05-Mar-07 11:14 PM, #40
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Daevryn, 05-Mar-07 11:35 PM, #41
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Eskelian, 06-Mar-07 11:25 AM, #49
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:38 AM, #46
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 04-Mar-07 11:10 PM, #7
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 11:18 PM, #8
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 04-Mar-07 11:27 PM, #9
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 12:41 AM, #10
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 01:06 AM, #11
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 09:34 AM, #12
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Tac, 05-Mar-07 09:38 AM, #14
     Reply So, does dragonbone = bone, but dragonscale = its own c..., GinGa, 05-Mar-07 02:53 PM, #25
          Reply I didn't notice Valg said dragonscale, Tac, 05-Mar-07 03:07 PM, #26
               Reply Dragon = dragon., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 03:32 PM, #27
                    Reply So then..., vargal, 05-Mar-07 04:38 PM, #28
                    Reply RE: So then..., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 05:28 PM, #29
                         Reply This is correct. (n/t), Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:18 AM, #44
                    Reply Dragons aren't that rare, Tac, 05-Mar-07 05:31 PM, #30
                         Reply Some people like finding out secret stuff on their own...., Elerosse, 05-Mar-07 06:17 PM, #31
                              Reply Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Tac, 05-Mar-07 06:55 PM, #34
                                   Reply RE: Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Dragomir, 05-Mar-07 08:11 PM, #35
                                        Reply RE: Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 08:20 PM, #36
                                             Reply You are correct, I got carried away. Sorry., Dragomir, 05-Mar-07 08:26 PM, #37
                                             Reply RE: You are correct, I got carried away. Sorry., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 09:02 PM, #38
                                             Reply Thank You - n/t, Cyradia, 06-Mar-07 08:41 AM, #47
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 10:03 AM, #18
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 10:09 AM, #19
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Sebeok, 05-Mar-07 10:25 AM, #20
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Kastellyn, 05-Mar-07 09:37 AM, #13
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 09:52 AM, #15
               Reply You underestimate the Kasty., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 09:57 AM, #16
                    Reply RE: You underestimate the Kasty., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 10:02 AM, #17
     Reply Further Question on Shifters, Lord_hoven, 09-Mar-07 01:44 PM, #51
Reply I had three questions too..., Doge, 05-Mar-07 12:46 PM, #21
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 12:53 PM, #22
     Reply Is the second point correct?, incognito, 05-Mar-07 06:27 PM, #32
     Reply RE: Is the second point correct?, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 06:44 PM #33
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Doge, 05-Mar-07 10:01 PM, #39
          Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Isildur, 06-Mar-07 12:09 AM, #42
               Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Doge, 06-Mar-07 10:49 AM, #48
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 01:50 PM, #24
Reply My own observation/question., Odrirg, 04-Mar-07 07:30 PM, #5
Reply I disagree, incognito, 05-Mar-07 01:37 PM, #23
Reply Another Question:, Rodriguez, 04-Mar-07 05:46 PM, #2
Reply Depends!, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 06:31 PM, #3
Reply My own ARMOR/AC question -, Straklaw, 04-Mar-07 02:38 PM, #1
     Reply RE: My own ARMOR/AC question -, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 06:42 PM, #4
          Reply Re: Sensible Dressing and Other Random Questions, Straklaw, 04-Mar-07 08:06 PM, #6
          Reply Quick related question about mystical armor use, Abernyte, 06-Mar-07 04:47 AM, #43
               Reply Can't reproduce this., Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:27 AM, #45
                    Reply Ok thanks, I must have missed it ~, Abernyte, 06-Mar-07 11:51 AM, #50
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #16834 Previous topic | Next topic