Subject: "I disagree" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #16834
Show all folders

incognitoMon 05-Mar-07 01:37 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
4495 posts
Click to add this author to your buddy list
#16878, "I disagree"


          

Compared with before...

AC meant nothing. No blows got deflected. So, after defenses fail, magi got hit with pretty much everything and hit with pretty much everything. But hitting with everything doesn't mean much to a mage.

Now, said mage can get some deflection from his armor after something gets past his defenses (even with precise aim). Not a lot, but more than before.

Said mage will now find it considerably harder to hit the warrior (say), but that's not too relevant because said mage never did much against the warrior in melee anyway.

So post change, magi gain in defense (slightly) and lose in offense (slightly), relative to pre-change.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicNew armor/hit stuff [View all] , Nivek1, Sun 04-Mar-07 02:22 PM
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 12-Mar-07 01:47 PM, #52
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 12-Mar-07 11:47 PM, #53
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 13-Mar-07 04:35 PM, #54
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 13-Mar-07 04:39 PM, #55
               Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Torak, 13-Mar-07 08:32 PM, #56
                    Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 14-Mar-07 07:04 AM, #57
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Eskelian, 05-Mar-07 11:14 PM, #40
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Daevryn, 05-Mar-07 11:35 PM, #41
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Eskelian, 06-Mar-07 11:25 AM, #49
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:38 AM, #46
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 04-Mar-07 11:10 PM, #7
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 11:18 PM, #8
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 04-Mar-07 11:27 PM, #9
Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 12:41 AM, #10
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 01:06 AM, #11
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 09:34 AM, #12
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Tac, 05-Mar-07 09:38 AM, #14
     Reply So, does dragonbone = bone, but dragonscale = its own c..., GinGa, 05-Mar-07 02:53 PM, #25
          Reply I didn't notice Valg said dragonscale, Tac, 05-Mar-07 03:07 PM, #26
               Reply Dragon = dragon., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 03:32 PM, #27
                    Reply So then..., vargal, 05-Mar-07 04:38 PM, #28
                    Reply RE: So then..., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 05:28 PM, #29
                         Reply This is correct. (n/t), Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:18 AM, #44
                    Reply Dragons aren't that rare, Tac, 05-Mar-07 05:31 PM, #30
                         Reply Some people like finding out secret stuff on their own...., Elerosse, 05-Mar-07 06:17 PM, #31
                              Reply Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Tac, 05-Mar-07 06:55 PM, #34
                                   Reply RE: Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Dragomir, 05-Mar-07 08:11 PM, #35
                                        Reply RE: Yep that's exactly what I'm saying, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 08:20 PM, #36
                                             Reply You are correct, I got carried away. Sorry., Dragomir, 05-Mar-07 08:26 PM, #37
                                             Reply RE: You are correct, I got carried away. Sorry., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 09:02 PM, #38
                                             Reply Thank You - n/t, Cyradia, 06-Mar-07 08:41 AM, #47
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 10:03 AM, #18
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 10:09 AM, #19
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Sebeok, 05-Mar-07 10:25 AM, #20
     Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Kastellyn, 05-Mar-07 09:37 AM, #13
          Reply RE: New armor/hit stuff, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 09:52 AM, #15
               Reply You underestimate the Kasty., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 09:57 AM, #16
                    Reply RE: You underestimate the Kasty., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 10:02 AM, #17
     Reply Further Question on Shifters, Lord_hoven, 09-Mar-07 01:44 PM, #51
Reply I had three questions too..., Doge, 05-Mar-07 12:46 PM, #21
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Isildur, 05-Mar-07 12:53 PM, #22
     Reply Is the second point correct?, incognito, 05-Mar-07 06:27 PM, #32
     Reply RE: Is the second point correct?, Isildur, 05-Mar-07 06:44 PM, #33
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Doge, 05-Mar-07 10:01 PM, #39
          Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Isildur, 06-Mar-07 12:09 AM, #42
               Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Doge, 06-Mar-07 10:49 AM, #48
     Reply RE: I had three questions too..., Valguarnera, 05-Mar-07 01:50 PM, #24
Reply My own observation/question., Odrirg, 04-Mar-07 07:30 PM, #5
Reply I disagree, incognito, 05-Mar-07 01:37 PM #23
Reply Another Question:, Rodriguez, 04-Mar-07 05:46 PM, #2
Reply Depends!, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 06:31 PM, #3
Reply My own ARMOR/AC question -, Straklaw, 04-Mar-07 02:38 PM, #1
     Reply RE: My own ARMOR/AC question -, Valguarnera, 04-Mar-07 06:42 PM, #4
          Reply Re: Sensible Dressing and Other Random Questions, Straklaw, 04-Mar-07 08:06 PM, #6
          Reply Quick related question about mystical armor use, Abernyte, 06-Mar-07 04:47 AM, #43
               Reply Can't reproduce this., Valguarnera, 06-Mar-07 08:27 AM, #45
                    Reply Ok thanks, I must have missed it ~, Abernyte, 06-Mar-07 11:51 AM, #50
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #16834 Previous topic | Next topic