nepenthe | Mon 25-Sep-06 12:37 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
|    |
|
#525, "RE: Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry long)"
|
>If your concern is the cost to you,
>then unpholding its current status should be the last thing
>you should want.
Unless you assume that the cost to society of "unchecked" use is higher than the cost of the status quo.
(I'm not saying that I do.)
|
|
|
 What affects me?
[View all] , Razoul, Mon 25-Sep-06 09:01 AM
  Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry long),
Mylinos,
25-Sep-06 12:32 PM, #2
 RE: Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry l...,
nepenthe,
25-Sep-06 12:37 PM #3
 RE: Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry l...,
Mylinos,
25-Sep-06 01:58 PM, #4
A danger in the government using cost/benefit analysis,
Quixotic,
25-Sep-06 04:04 PM, #6
Well this is just silly.,
Mylinos,
25-Sep-06 04:42 PM, #9
That was not meant as a red herring or an argument of e...,
Quixotic,
25-Sep-06 05:55 PM, #11
Cost/Benefit anaylsis,
Mylinos,
25-Sep-06 06:27 PM, #12
RE: Cost/Benefit anaylsis,
Quixotic,
25-Sep-06 07:56 PM, #13
RE: Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry l...,
Razoul,
25-Sep-06 04:15 PM, #7
Don't,
Tac,
25-Sep-06 04:33 PM, #8
RE: Not that this issue is important to me but (sorry l...,
Mylinos,
25-Sep-06 04:59 PM, #10
RE: What affects me?,
Eskelian,
25-Sep-06 11:10 AM, #1
A concern I have with a "pay the consequences" approach,
Quixotic,
25-Sep-06 03:45 PM, #5
RE: A concern I have with a,
Eskelian,
26-Sep-06 09:13 AM, #14
| |
|
