Subject: "RE: Comments and question for imms" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #1209
Show all folders

ValguarneraWed 11-Jun-03 01:22 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#1264, "RE: Comments and question for imms"


          

Is there a common immortal stance on ganging? Like

a) Ganging is good because it's realistic. Why work hard to kill someone alone when you can just gank him?

b) Ganging is bad because it's boring and overpowered.


My answer, and there's a range of opinions on this:

c) Ganging is complicated.

- Ganging helps prevents runaway trains- if someone is dominant, and their reputation spreads, people will gang them to put a stop to them. This prevents any one character from dominating for very long, and allows for retribution on rampant killers.

- In a similar fashion, the threat of ganging makes being in a group safer, which promotes interaction. The plus side of this is that if you're ranking or exploring, one guy is probably going to not be a threat unless they play their cards right, and you don't get interrupted as often. The minus side is that your group of three can spend all your time hunting for lone guys and creating fights which they'll be hard pressed to win.

- We don't want a system that makes no sense. Fighting someone two-on-one should be a significant advantage. If you played the realism card, it would be more than twice as easy- two people with weapons can encircle you, and it should be harder to parry/dodge/block a second attacker. But just like we don't put a penalty on defense as you get wounded because it rewards someone who is already winning and prevents heroic comebacks, I don't see us doing this.

- A blunt system that messes with ganging messes with balance in a big way. Conjurers don't often fight you alone. Necromancers and druids may not at the higher levels. Most ranking is done by 3-on-1 ganging an NPC. Etc. All of that means that a simple "counting = parry" type system will cause problems.

- Counting isn't even simple. Some fights have more than two sides. An out-of-range person might swing the fight (healer, paladin), stand around staring blankly (shifter, warrior), or anywhere in between (druid, ranger). Maybe you're fighting 3-on-1 because you just beat down that guy's 4 groupmates and are trying to close a 3-on-5. Maybe you're fighting 2-on-1 because the thief keeps fleeing to return and knife. Etc.

- If you bitch about it on a forum, don't do it in the game. Not you, but there's some other people who I've certainly seen in a gang often enough when it wasn't necessary.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicCrappy trends forming.. [View all] , Gabe, Tue 10-Jun-03 01:38 PM
Reply Cabal issues., josiah (Anonymous), 18-Jun-03 07:38 PM, #56
Reply RE: Cabal issues., Nivek1, 19-Jun-03 09:27 AM, #57
Reply RE: Cabal issues., nepenthe, 19-Jun-03 09:43 AM, #58
Reply Give neutrals Empire then?, josiah (Anonymous), 19-Jun-03 08:04 PM, #60
     Reply We've discussed this internally, and we're sticking wit..., Zulghinlour, 19-Jun-03 08:20 PM, #61
Reply RE: Cabal issues, Karithia, 19-Jun-03 12:30 PM, #59
Reply RE: Cabal issues, Brotmin, 22-Jun-03 08:13 PM, #63
     Reply Huh?, Quislet, 24-Jun-03 01:17 AM, #64
Reply RE: Cabal issues., Jarvino, 19-Jun-03 11:27 PM, #62
Reply My thoughts, Nivek1, 18-Jun-03 10:12 AM, #52
Reply As re: cabal raids, Theerkla, 18-Jun-03 01:00 PM, #53
Reply What i think., Jhyrbian, 13-Jun-03 10:11 PM, #47
Reply Something to keep in mind, (NOT Graatch), 18-Jun-03 02:23 PM, #54
     Reply Leika. Absolutely., Balrahd, 18-Jun-03 04:30 PM, #55
Reply The End All Be All Sub-Thread Re: LOOTING, Zepachu, 13-Jun-03 02:12 PM, #43
Reply And don't forget:, Quislet, 13-Jun-03 02:29 PM, #44
Reply It's a toss-up., Zepachu, 13-Jun-03 03:06 PM, #46
Reply RE: The End All Be All Sub-Thread Re: LOOTING, Valkenar, 13-Jun-03 02:54 PM, #45
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., nepenthe, 11-Jun-03 03:06 PM, #37
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., Gabe, 11-Jun-03 03:58 PM, #38
Reply Comments and question for imms, Marcus_, 11-Jun-03 10:09 AM, #31
Reply RE: Comments and question for imms, Valguarnera, 11-Jun-03 01:22 PM #35
     Reply yessir!, shokai, 11-Jun-03 01:53 PM, #36
Reply Source of the rose colored glasses?, idontplay, 11-Jun-03 04:28 AM, #29
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., Doge, 10-Jun-03 06:31 PM, #21
Reply RE: group vs group combat rules, Scarabaeus, 10-Jun-03 10:38 PM, #28
Reply I like a lot of this stuff but, incognito, 10-Jun-03 06:06 PM, #18
Reply RE: I like a lot of this stuff but, Isildur, 10-Jun-03 06:24 PM, #20
Reply RE: Save, Valguarnera, 10-Jun-03 10:06 PM, #27
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., Hutto, 10-Jun-03 05:34 PM, #17
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., marcalius, 10-Jun-03 03:44 PM, #14
Reply Simple solution for one of the problems., Anal_Retentive, 10-Jun-03 03:28 PM, #12
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., Boldereth, 10-Jun-03 03:26 PM, #11
Reply beware...mild rant inside, shokai, 10-Jun-03 03:48 PM, #15
     Reply RE: beware...mild rant inside, Hutto, 10-Jun-03 04:48 PM, #16
     Reply RE: beware...mild rant inside, Isildur, 10-Jun-03 06:19 PM, #19
     Reply RE: beware...mild rant inside, Quislet, 10-Jun-03 06:45 PM, #22
          Reply RE: beware...mild rant inside, Gabe, 10-Jun-03 06:50 PM, #24
               Reply I wasn't paraphrasing., Quislet, 12-Jun-03 06:08 PM, #40
                    Reply RE: I wasn't paraphrasing., Gabe, 13-Jun-03 01:17 PM, #41
                         Reply RE: I wasn't paraphrasing., Quislet, 13-Jun-03 02:06 PM, #42
     Reply RE: beware...mild rant inside, Boldereth, 11-Jun-03 09:47 PM, #39
          Reply it's happening more than people think..., shokai, 14-Jun-03 12:20 AM, #48
               Reply Speaking specifically for full looting..., Gabe, 16-Jun-03 02:57 PM, #49
                    Reply RE: Speaking specifically for full looting..., Valguarnera, 16-Jun-03 07:46 PM, #50
                         Reply Idea in this context, Doge, 17-Jun-03 10:01 PM, #51
Reply selective memory...., shokai, 10-Jun-03 03:18 PM, #7
Reply RE: selective memory...., Gabe, 10-Jun-03 03:22 PM, #9
Reply Ah Smurfs..., Santa Claus, 10-Jun-03 03:28 PM, #13
Reply good times..., Larshalv, 11-Jun-03 08:10 AM, #30
Reply Problem is, Valkenar, 10-Jun-03 02:53 PM, #6
Reply Re: This is a game, Zulghinlour, 10-Jun-03 02:44 PM, #5
Reply RE: Re: This is a game, Gabe, 10-Jun-03 06:48 PM, #23
Reply RE: Re: This is a game, Zulghinlour, 10-Jun-03 07:10 PM, #25
     Reply RE: Re: This is a game, Gabe, 11-Jun-03 10:31 AM, #32
          Reply RE: Re: This is a game, Zulghinlour, 11-Jun-03 12:27 PM, #33
               Reply Thanks for the feedback, Z. (n/t), Gabe, 11-Jun-03 12:33 PM, #34
Reply RE: Re: This is a game, Zepachu, 10-Jun-03 08:11 PM, #26
Reply Please take off the rose colored glasses, Tanadin (Anonymous), 10-Jun-03 02:42 PM, #4
Reply RE: Please take off the rose colored glasses, Gabe, 10-Jun-03 03:23 PM, #10
Reply RE: Crappy trends forming.., Mazaufat, 10-Jun-03 02:41 PM, #3
Reply If you are going to respond.., Gabe, 10-Jun-03 03:19 PM, #8
Reply Some good thoughts, and.., Santa Claus, 10-Jun-03 02:33 PM, #2
Reply I believe the lag on loot was first proposed by me..., (NOT Pro), 10-Jun-03 02:06 PM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #1209 Previous topic | Next topic