|
Torak | Sat 15-Oct-11 01:55 AM |
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1216 posts
| |
|
#40677, "I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this...."
Edited on Sat 15-Oct-11 01:55 AM
|
...don't hate me Twist After reading the PBF, I just want to shed some light on why some of us weren't shocked to find out Tavlin was played by an Immortal. Most cheating accusations came from people who get their ass kicked by a powerhouse repeatedly (which you did to most people). These two points are what really caught my eye.
-Within 3 hours played time, you received role exp (1500) and immteraction experience (500) and were inducted into Scion. Your character role and character hadn't been alive for even a full day of real life time (not game time).
Not entirely sure if this was a personal one-on-one immteraction experience, but that turnaround is lightning fast. Immediately getting role return and immteraction is pretty darn rare (I've never got that lucky, I'm usually waiting awhile for role experience...and get a handful of immteraction in the lifetime of a character). Not to mention cabal induction - I do understand that there was a post about lack of leadership... maybe I should write more roles that signal I know the First Age You mentioned "Other than the early induct and early Advisordom, I didn't get early rewards." I'd say this is a pretty rare and uncommon experience for most of us and definitely a reward. You obviously caught the eye of some people immediately (which you deserved) but plenty of people that do deserve it never get seen or it takes quite awhile. Also Advisor in 22 hours is pretty nuts - even the prophet dwarf commander took 65.
-The other one...
Mon Jun 6 21:10:51 2011 by 'An Immortal' at level 51 (275 hrs): An Immortal added 1000 exp for: How did you get mummy, continue to be a reasonable badass, and never get any more imm xp love?
At this point in your life, you already had 3675 immexp. You added no role additions and got roughly 20 kills but did make mummy pretty fast (1 day for items turned in). Was it really necessary to give you a huge 1000 experience which puts you at more immexp than most characters get their entire lives (including Paralouit, Charine, Rhone and basically every "badass" RPer over the last two years)? I know the standards of what immexp is "normal" fluctuates over the years and per immortal but just seemed a bit overboard for 70 hours of not that much...
There's other little bits but not worth dredging up (M:TG anyone?). Anyways, just had to say something. I'm probably going to be flamed to high hell for bringing this up. I just wanted to bring up that you didn't have a "normal" experience. Which is fine...Tavlin wasn't "normal" but ya get the idea. Be gentle!
|
|
|
|
Really, the most important question here is,
Dallevian,
17-Oct-11 09:23 AM, #96
He secretely steals the donations...,
Onewingedangel,
17-Oct-11 12:40 PM, #120
Personally, I don't care,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
17-Oct-11 08:48 AM, #92
Curious what you mean...,
Twist,
17-Oct-11 10:27 AM, #105
Simple,
BaronMySoul (Anonymous),
17-Oct-11 10:41 AM, #108
It wouldn't do any good.,
Valkenar,
17-Oct-11 11:27 AM, #112
The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?,
TheDude,
16-Oct-11 03:58 PM, #51
A small subset of CF likes to ruin other people's fun.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 04:06 PM, #52
Except...,
robdarken_,
16-Oct-11 06:30 PM, #65
RE: The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?,
ORB,
16-Oct-11 05:02 PM, #59
RE: The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 05:21 PM, #62
Again, how would this negatively affect you though?,
TheDude,
16-Oct-11 07:15 PM, #67
Essentially:,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 07:23 PM, #68
RE: Essentially:,
Onewingedangel,
16-Oct-11 10:27 PM, #79
Actually, Twist plays his share of duds.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 10:37 PM, #82
RE: Actually, Twist plays his share of duds.,
Onewingedangel,
16-Oct-11 10:45 PM, #83
I was a big fan of Sirak btw.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 11:07 PM, #84
RE: I was a big fan of Sirak btw.,
Onewingedangel,
16-Oct-11 11:11 PM, #85
Ghrimriddor.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 11:34 PM, #86
RE: Ghrimriddor.,
Onewingedangel,
16-Oct-11 11:47 PM, #87
RE: Actually, Twist plays his share of duds.,
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 08:16 AM, #91
That's why I think Balrahd is the best.,
TMNS,
17-Oct-11 09:55 AM, #99
He's certainly up there (n/t),
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 10:06 AM, #101
Jagaub/Balrahd/Mek/Twist/Intronan/Kasty. nt,
Dallevian,
17-Oct-11 10:12 AM, #104
RE: Essentially:,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 09:26 AM, #93
I just want to be clear...,
Twist,
17-Oct-11 10:29 AM, #106
RE: I just want to be clear...,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 10:48 AM, #109
You've a very interesting view,
Twist,
17-Oct-11 11:07 AM, #110
RE: You've a very interesting view,
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 11:26 AM, #111
RE: You've a very interesting view,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 11:48 AM, #113
Re: ROC,
Zulghinlour,
17-Oct-11 11:49 AM, #114
RE: Re: ROC,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 12:01 PM, #116
No, ROC isn't one con per one kill,
Tsunami,
17-Oct-11 12:05 PM, #117
RE: Re: ROC,
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 12:13 PM, #118
Mummies have always been 2 deaths/con,
Twist,
17-Oct-11 12:24 PM, #119
Not flaming but...,
Dallevian,
16-Oct-11 11:49 AM, #44
Now I wish I'd given him that lich quest,
Rayihn,
16-Oct-11 06:44 AM, #39
Vocal minority at it again, I guess,
MoetEtChandon,
16-Oct-11 10:34 AM, #43
So wait...,
TripHitNdip (Anonymous),
16-Oct-11 01:35 PM, #49
Funny thing about assumptions...,
Twist,
16-Oct-11 02:46 PM, #50
RE: So wait...,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 07:26 PM, #69
RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this....,
Reksah,
15-Oct-11 11:16 PM, #30
Seriously dude, don't listen to Torak.,
TMNS,
15-Oct-11 11:27 PM, #32
Ok whoa whoa, #### off,
Torak,
16-Oct-11 12:11 AM, #34
RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this....,
ORB,
16-Oct-11 01:28 AM, #36
RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this....,
Twist,
16-Oct-11 11:55 AM, #45
As Ckath I'll try to remember what happened.,
Amberion,
16-Oct-11 04:09 PM, #53
RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this....,
ORB,
16-Oct-11 04:55 PM, #56
Niheriva was Jalim. I have suspicions about the others...,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 05:15 PM, #60
The reason I chose those three mortals...,
Twist,
16-Oct-11 05:39 PM, #63
RE: The reason I chose those three mortals...,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 07:31 PM, #70
I thought Flaaayin and para were the same player.,
Dallevian,
16-Oct-11 09:23 PM, #77
Nah. Paralouit I'm pretty sure you're correct about.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 10:29 PM, #81
I'm with the Forsaken here.,
DurNominator,
17-Oct-11 12:21 AM, #88
No one fessed up to the Flaaayin.,
TMNS,
17-Oct-11 01:49 AM, #90
The were both Katholas(sp?) the ex-Imm,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 09:20 AM, #95
RE: The were both Katholas(sp?) the ex-Imm,
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 09:35 AM, #97
I always thought he was Paralouit.,
TMNS,
17-Oct-11 10:12 AM, #100
RE: I always thought he was Paralouit.,
Daevryn,
17-Oct-11 10:08 AM, #102
Indeed Stevers is not an IMM and I heard he played Nihe...,
Lhydia,
16-Oct-11 09:25 PM, #78
What the #### happened to you man?,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 10:28 PM, #80
I'll take this as jalim fessing up Wiril. nt,
DurNominator,
17-Oct-11 12:24 AM, #89
Didn't he get married? : ) nt,
Dallevian,
17-Oct-11 09:18 AM, #94
Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's loving.....,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 01:25 PM, #48
RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi...,
ORB,
16-Oct-11 04:48 PM, #55
Hahahahahahahahahahahaha.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 04:56 PM, #57
I was actually thinking of lightmage n/t,
Vortex Magus,
16-Oct-11 06:54 PM, #66
He's just the best writer on CF.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 07:44 PM, #73
Give him a little more credit than that:,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 08:12 PM, #75
No doubt. He's just a really really good writer.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 08:43 PM, #76
RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi...,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 07:35 PM, #71
RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi...,
HammerSong,
16-Oct-11 08:12 PM, #74
RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi...,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 10:09 AM, #103
I disagree.,
ORB,
17-Oct-11 10:39 AM, #107
Hrm,
fist-law,
16-Oct-11 01:56 AM, #38
If it makes you feel better...,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 04:24 PM, #54
As a devil's advocate example...,
Splntrd,
15-Oct-11 10:14 PM, #27
I think there's some validity to your point, but...,
Bell,
15-Oct-11 04:07 PM, #19
Disagree, reasons inside.,
Explosion,
15-Oct-11 02:00 PM, #11
I -do- think Tavlin got rewarded pretty damn hard prett...,
Vortex Magus,
15-Oct-11 09:18 AM, #6
RE: I -do- think Tavlin got rewarded pretty damn hard p...,
Daevryn,
15-Oct-11 07:29 PM, #24
name a few?,
Dallevian,
15-Oct-11 08:57 PM, #25
I know for a fact he had a battle scout thief...,
TMNS,
15-Oct-11 09:14 PM, #26
was one,
Dallevian,
15-Oct-11 11:11 PM, #29
Yep. He copped to it too.,
TMNS,
15-Oct-11 11:26 PM, #31
That was 4? 5? years ago?,
Rayihn,
16-Oct-11 06:57 AM, #40
Huh? I never did :),
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 01:20 PM, #47
I keep saying imms need to play more mortals.,
lasentia,
16-Oct-11 04:58 PM, #58
You just made Poppa E cream his pants.,
TMNS,
16-Oct-11 05:16 PM, #61
RE: I keep saying imms need to play more mortals.,
Daevryn,
16-Oct-11 07:38 PM, #72
I don't mind IMM's getting rewards...,
Lhydia,
15-Oct-11 05:35 AM, #2
RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards...,
ORB,
15-Oct-11 07:40 AM, #3
RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards...,
Daevryn,
15-Oct-11 07:26 PM, #23
Didnt you cry the same way over the Battle leader?,
Oldril,
15-Oct-11 01:36 PM, #10
RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards...,
Zulghinlour,
16-Oct-11 12:41 AM, #35
Nope. n/t,
Lhydia,
16-Oct-11 08:23 AM, #42
He likes to be peed on is how I read it. nt,
SuperIsisMan,
16-Oct-11 01:04 PM, #46
My best character was "Elorik" in terms of rewards,
Tsunami,
15-Oct-11 03:40 AM, #1
RE: My best character was ,
ORB,
15-Oct-11 07:43 AM, #4
There were 0 necros in scion at the time.,
lasentia,
15-Oct-11 09:10 AM, #5
FWIW,
Nreykre,
15-Oct-11 09:36 AM, #7
RE: FWIW,
ORB,
15-Oct-11 12:13 PM, #8
I hunted for quite a while before deleting Tavlin...,
Twist,
15-Oct-11 02:18 PM, #12
Cursed kids!,
Straklaw,
15-Oct-11 02:56 PM, #14
The next Sunwarden shall be a Minotaur. I have prophes...,
Artificial,
15-Oct-11 03:19 PM, #17
I don't get the hate,
Oldril,
15-Oct-11 11:06 PM, #28
For the first and only time, I totally agree with this.,
TMNS,
15-Oct-11 11:42 PM, #33
RE: For the first and only time, I totally agree with t...,
ORB,
16-Oct-11 01:32 AM, #37
You blame Twist for the wrong things.,
lasentia,
16-Oct-11 07:27 AM, #41
RE: FWIW,
Onewingedangel,
15-Oct-11 03:03 PM, #15
Blame Mharlndarn,
Oldril,
15-Oct-11 01:31 PM, #9
RE: FWIW,
HammerSong,
15-Oct-11 02:47 PM, #13
Heh. It was supposed to my lowbie Fort pkiller!,
TMNS,
15-Oct-11 03:12 PM, #16
Keep at the globals,
lasentia,
15-Oct-11 03:23 PM, #18
RE: Keep at the globals,
The-me,
15-Oct-11 04:37 PM, #21
Yeah! Those things were awesome! N/T,
Amberion,
15-Oct-11 06:09 PM, #22
I just dont understand.,
Kalageadon,
15-Oct-11 04:27 PM, #20
LOOK AT IT THIS WAY,
SideStrider,
16-Oct-11 06:16 PM, #64
RE: LOOK AT IT THIS WAY,
SideStrider,
17-Oct-11 09:45 AM, #98
So?,
Tsunami,
17-Oct-11 11:56 AM, #115
| |
|
Dallevian | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:23 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40795, "Really, the most important question here is"
In response to Reply #0
|
htf is twist able to play so many hours a week? I want his job. But my life.
Keep it up man!
|
|
|
|
  |
Onewingedangel | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:40 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40827, "He secretely steals the donations..."
In response to Reply #96
|
...and uses it in an internet cafe all day! He lives in a box, so no mortgage, no phone, no electricity bill. Just all CF all day for him.
Just kidding Twist! Although, I am kinda curious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40790, "Personally, I don't care"
In response to Reply #0
|
Had it been any non-imm, the PBF would have been mostly normal, with the exception of the imm induction into Scion at level 18 and 3 hours into playtime.
Daevryn (and other imms), if you want to stop the conspiracy theories, create an environment where you and the imms are beyond reproach in matters like these. There are ways you can accomplish this without IP-stalking, as you suggested. Personally, I'd prefer you play the game (harassment-free) if you want because I feel that creatively expressing yourself as a mortal keeps you somewhat in touch with the playerbase. As mentioned elsewhere in this thread, Twist has had several unsuccessful mortals since his return. However, since this one was SO successful in SO many ways, it's easy to imagine behind-the-scenes tampering (whether there was any or not). Tavlin was a stellar character, nobody is denying that. Maybe he deserved even more than he got, but being that he was who he was, matters were more complicated. It's like a politician getting his picture taken with a hooker. Maybe there's a perfectly good explanation for why he happened to be there with the hooker, but people are just going to assume the worst.
Some headache cures: - log IP tracks, publish them in PBF. For all the bitching about this thing in particular, I'm surprised this hasn't been thought of already. Probably would save you some headaches.
- imm exp averages for a given day, week, month, etc. Well, maybe Twist got a bunch of imm experience early on, but was he the *only* person to get rewarded that entire day and by that much? What if one imm was in a good mood and just handed it out like candy at their own discretion for a particular day? This is a good idea because imm experience early on offers a nice advantage in edge picking. Transparency ends speculation.
- standards for induction beyond the current scope. I've had characters make it into a cabal within a few hours of playing time too, but I've also had characters wait 50+ hours to get into a cabal. There *should* be some standards to negate either extreme. A character should be at least X hours old OR have existed for X number of real weeks. For cabal leaders and imms, it should be known how long someone is an applicant. The longer someone is an applicant for a given cabal without induction, the more priority they should be given to get inducted, or at least put on the right path if it's felt they're not ready.
|
|
|
|
    |
|
#40814, "Simple"
In response to Reply #105
|
If someone's IP is tracked by an Imm (assuming that it's a command and not just something that shows up next to the name in a tell), log the character's hour life to be published in the PBF.
The idea is to cut off the argument of player A who says they were treated unfairly because an imm tracked their IP and knew who they were. The argument that you got special treatment because imms knew you by your IP would be somewhat negated by knowing that imms never did any IP sniffing until much later. Though I imagine it'd come in most useful for the former rather than the latter.
But I digress. Really don't care. Just thought I'd try to offer some solutions to mitigate this headache.
|
|
|
|
      |
Valkenar | Mon 17-Oct-11 11:27 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1203 posts
| |
|
#40818, "It wouldn't do any good."
In response to Reply #108
|
>If someone's IP is tracked by an Imm (assuming that it's a >command and not just something that shows up next to the name >in a tell), log the character's hour life to be published in >the PBF.
Even if that existed, how would it help? Conspiracy theorists would just say that it had been edited out of the PBF. Reasonable people already understand that nobody cheated here. Unreasonable people are going to think whatever they want. Because they're unreasonable.
|
|
|
|
|
TheDude | Sun 16-Oct-11 03:58 PM |
Member since 20th Sep 2005
285 posts
| |
|
#40739, "The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?"
In response to Reply #0
|
A) How does it negatively affect you, or anybody?
B) How does it positively affect you, or anybody?
I'd bet that the list for B is a lot longer than the list for A (which, I can't think of one thing to put in that list, actually).
I don't understand the purpose of this post, other than to try and ruin the fun of one of the Imms who likes to play generally well-liked mortals, and who is one of the only ones to fess up to playing his (which is extremely refreshing).
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sun 16-Oct-11 05:02 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40748, "RE: The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?"
In response to Reply #51
|
To be honest my problem with it is the hypocrisy of it. Not sure how long you've been around but forever it's been the mantra of the staff that we all play on a completely level playing field and they don't have any advantage, yadda, yadda, yadda. Meanwhile having played from back in the day there was rampant Imm #### back then and as recently as Cabdru which I think they've finally owned up to, even if they are still spinning it a ton. So it bothers me that they still play this card of a completely fair and balanced game when it's so obviously not. Just like the IP checking thing which for years they claimed only to do in extreme circumstances is obviously very common place and definitely a large impact on the players. So you may not care that the poker dealer is stacking the deck. However to say I need to agree with that is ####, especially considering most of us are putting hundreds of hours a year into this hobby. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
    |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 05:21 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40751, "RE: The thing is, even if he was hooked up, who cares?"
In response to Reply #59
|
>To be honest my problem with it is the hypocrisy of it. Not >sure how long you've been around but forever it's been the >mantra of the staff that we all play on a completely level >playing field and they don't have any advantage, yadda, yadda, >yadda. Meanwhile having played from back in the day there was >rampant Imm #### back then and as recently as Cabdru which I >think they've finally owned up to, even if they are still >spinning it a ton. So it bothers me that they still play this >card of a completely fair and balanced game when it's so >obviously not. Just like the IP checking thing which for years >they claimed only to do in extreme circumstances is obviously >very common place and definitely a large impact on the >players. >So you may not care that the poker dealer is stacking the >deck. However to say I need to agree with that is ####, >especially considering most of us are putting hundreds of >hours a year into this hobby.
IMMs (specifically IMPs) have put THOUSANDS OF HOURS a year into CF. THOUSANDS.
Just wanted to touch on that point.
Also, the IP stuff just cracks me up. Unless your name is Graatch, I don't think you have anything to worry about (hehehehehehe). I mean, without looking at IPs I can figure out who half the caballed heroes at any one time are being played by certain players. And I'm usually 75%-80% right.
For example, I may rank at the same out of the way spot with all my evil characters. Imm sees one character do it. Next time IMM is snooping random character and see them ranking in that spot, they are probably going to assume it's me. Another example, say you always do a certain rare quest with every character. You're probably going to know only 5-10 people know that quest so if you see someone doing it, you know it's one of those 5-10 people.
And finally, if the IMMs really did check IPs as stringently as you claim, I wouldn't even be on these forums anymore. Thror would have never started me on the path to Commander, in fact, I'd say Cyradia would have never dinged Jindicho (because if she checked my IP she'd realize I played several non-douchey characters right before that) and I would have never quit playing for 6 months.
I've posted way too much on this topic already. I'll let other people argue now.
|
|
|
|
    |
TheDude | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:15 PM |
Member since 20th Sep 2005
285 posts
| |
|
#40756, "Again, how would this negatively affect you though?"
In response to Reply #59
|
It's not like Twist getting rewards precludes you from getting anything. The only argument I could see is if you wanted the Advisor spot or something and didn't get it.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:23 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40757, "Essentially:"
In response to Reply #59
|
What you want is not a level playing field; what you want is for me to stalk Twist's characters and make very sure not to reward them even if he deserves it.
Which, actually, is pretty much what I personally did with Tavlin -- if anyone else played a role contest winning, constant RP standout, constant PK standout, cabal leader character I'd push like hell for them to get a lichquest.
And that's still not good enough for you, so #### it.
|
|
|
|
      |
Onewingedangel | Sun 16-Oct-11 10:26 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40768, "RE: Essentially:"
In response to Reply #68
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 10:27 PM
|
Honestly, Here's my opinion on this whole matter. Twist always plays quality mortals, Dupmasione, Hanord, Hunsobo, now Tavlin. Yes, I named his most famous, because I've interacted with three of the four, and each was great, both friendly and enemy. It's only a small percentage of the playerbase who have a problem with it, so screw them. Those of us who are mature enough to realize yeah, He "MIGHT" have somewhat of an advantage being an IMM, he still has loads more experience and skill than us, and that's why he shines out, even more than any other IMM who plays mortals.
I say stop ####footing around, and reward everyone like they deserve it, whether you know it's an IMM or not. If someone has a problem with it, just ask them to play quality characters more often, and the rewards will come their way. Simple.
Edit to add: I think he should've gotten Lich anyway. He deserves it, for playing great mortals, being a great IMM, and dealing with #### like he did for Tavlin. You're the man, Twist.
|
|
|
|
        |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 10:37 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40771, "Actually, Twist plays his share of duds."
In response to Reply #79
|
No one remembers his crappy chars (except me!), Bonthos (TRIB Fire AP) was meh, Balthudar was alright but no powerhouse or badass, and I won't even get into his BATTLE assassin (I don't want to hurt his feelings).
I'm sure he's played plenty of mediocre chars since he returned. But as I said, no one wants to talk about those chars because that would ruin their conspiracy theories.
Twist is one of the five best players on CF though.
|
|
|
|
          |
Onewingedangel | Sun 16-Oct-11 10:45 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40772, "RE: Actually, Twist plays his share of duds."
In response to Reply #82
|
I know he does, but hey, everyone does....If anyone remember Mestrikia, my elf invoker, she completely failed. Con death at 37...shougrah was me. But I do play some Semi-Decent characters, like Sirak (although my freaking computer died.) but My good characters when put next to his...Sirak next to Tavlin. Twist wins! I bet Bonthos would've killed Mestrikia. But hey, I'm just saying is, IMM's should stop worrying about making the few angry by rewarding another possible IMM's character, if they deserve it, give it to them. That's all I'm saying
BTW, you can always remember me, too
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
Onewingedangel | Sun 16-Oct-11 11:11 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40774, "RE: I was a big fan of Sirak btw."
In response to Reply #84
|
Thanks man, definitely my most fun character so far. Who did I interract with you as Sirak, anyway? Kinda curious.
|
|
|
|
                | |
                  |
Onewingedangel | Sun 16-Oct-11 11:47 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40776, "RE: Ghrimriddor."
In response to Reply #86
|
I know your pain, my last villager got stuck so many times by Cents, while trying to get mage kills. You were a classy enemy, if only I had been able to complete Sirak's life. So many things gone with that laptop.
|
|
|
|
          |
Daevryn | Mon 17-Oct-11 08:16 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40786, "RE: Actually, Twist plays his share of duds."
In response to Reply #82
|
>Twist is one of the five best players on CF though.
I've said for a long, long time that if I were forced to pick a single best, it would be Twist because almost everyone else who's a consistent standout has a much more limited range.
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
Daevryn | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:06 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40806, "He's certainly up there (n/t)"
In response to Reply #99
|
|
|
              |
Dallevian | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:12 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40809, "Jagaub/Balrahd/Mek/Twist/Intronan/Kasty. nt"
In response to Reply #99
|
|
|
      |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:15 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40792, "RE: Essentially:"
In response to Reply #68
Edited on Mon 17-Oct-11 09:26 AM
|
Not what I'm saying at all. It really has nothing to do with Twist, and more about heaping rewards over and over on the same char while the vast majority see nothing. Twist just happens to have great char. I'm not saying don't reward him, I'm saying does a already powerful char need a 3rd legacy and a 3rd spec and 3 extra cabal edges and 20k Imm Xp so they can get every warrior edge there is? While I see other well played characters who are lucky if they get a custom title. Take Sivyh for example, I think everyone can agree he was an excellently RP/PK character, who was extremely long lived, and played in good times and bad. He got jack #### as rewards compared to Tavlin except a custom title. Also you of all people should stop playing the victim card every time this is brought up. Also I wouldn't have had an issue with Tavlin getting a Lich quest, what I would have had issue is if you gave him the +con spell on top of him liching.
P.S. I don't get the "HOW DARE YOU EVEN QUESTION THESE THINGS!?" outrage I'm getting from these posts(mostly from a few players). I know it's not a democracy but I shouldn't players be able to express their opinions on things like this and be allowed to question things from time to time? That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
          |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:48 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40815, "RE: I just want to be clear..."
In response to Reply #106
|
Yes because any well RP'd necro should get a Lich quest so to me that's fair, and Tavlin was definately well RP'd enough to get one. Getting granted bonus skills/spells/edges above and beyond something like that is what I have the issue with. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
            | |
              | |
              |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 11:44 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40820, "RE: You've a very interesting view"
In response to Reply #110
Edited on Mon 17-Oct-11 11:48 AM
|
I believe you have every right to every perk a normally well played character would get. Why shouldn't you Lich? I think being able to restore your Con on Tavlin was extremely OP. Look you were very tough as Tavlin, but not unbeatable. Eventually we could have con killed you and ended the rain of terror at a con a pop. But if you can have a chance to give yourself con back with each kill? How is that not OP?
My biggest qualm is characters like Rhone, Ghurlzgred, Sivyh, Mhladramn(sp?), Mundin. All long lived impressive characters got pretty much nothing in terms of rewards, but a Flaayin, Paralouit or a Tavlin get Monty Halled for lack of a better term. Just seems like a big disconnect. I'm not saying your characters shouldn't be rewarded but why not the other ones? Just seems like Imm/Ex-Imm seem to be the ones with the big rewards while other deserving char get next to nothing. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
                |
Zulghinlour | Mon 17-Oct-11 11:49 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#40821, "Re: ROC"
In response to Reply #113
|
>But if you can have a chance to give >yourself con back with each kill? How is that not OP?
And he wasn't the first person to get it. Many liches have had it prior to Tavlin. Also in the case of a mummy, it's about 1/3rd as effective as on a lich. So even if you used it on every kill you made you won't be getting con for it.
>Eventually we could have con killed you and ended the rain of >terror at a con a pop.
And these days, his reign of terror would end at a specific time, since even the undead "age die" now.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
                  |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:01 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40823, "RE: Re: ROC"
In response to Reply #114
|
Wait I thought mummies are 1 death 1 con? Did that get changed so they are 1/3 like everyone else? With the spell though it's basically guranteed he will age die, instead of being able to con kill him(Not that it would be an easy task but at least possible). That still seems like an insanely good perk to me. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
                    |
Tsunami | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:05 PM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#40824, "No, ROC isn't one con per one kill"
In response to Reply #116
|
Is what he is saying.
He is saying RoC isn't full proof to get CON even on a lich. It's even WORSE (1/3 as effective) on a mummy.
|
|
|
|
                    |
Daevryn | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:13 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40825, "RE: Re: ROC"
In response to Reply #116
|
Mummies have been 2 deaths to a con for a long while now. It's one of their few upsides vs. a lich.
Realistically, no, no one would have ever run Tavlin out of con, not even if he somehow got an extra thousand hours to play, not even if he got full looted.
|
|
|
|
                    |
Twist | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:24 PM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#40826, "Mummies have always been 2 deaths/con"
In response to Reply #116
|
Did you even *read* my goodbye thread? SO many of the points you are trying to make I already addressed there.
Tavlin deleted with 19 CON and I still had a train left. I'd been killed precisely twice in about a month.
There's no way anyone was going to con kill me. If I had such a bad run that I dropped 37 deaths prior to age death/boredom, I'd have simply deleted.
Cotzibue got RoC before me. For nothing other than being a long-lived character that was pretty cool. Mine came with a pricetag of 2000 gold (which, thanks to Tavlin's in-game contacts and already hefty bank account, wasn't a terrible burden). The difficulty isn't really the point. The point is that a non-imm-played mummy during the same timeframe received the same perk (and it was actually VERY useful to that char, as it kept her alive for a few more deaths) for nothing.
For Tavlin, getting RoC was essentially a RP mechanic. Instead of emoting doing nasty things to a recently slain victim, I could cast a spell that did nasty(er) things to that victim.
Your arguments are beginning to sound more and more silly, I have to say.
As for the other mortals you mention, I haven't looked at them thoroughly, but I know that Sivyh got tattooed, immxp from Enlilth, edgepoints (for a quest), 2 trains worth of hp and immxp (for another quest), immxp for good roleplay, a custom title and custom long desc.
I wouldn't have been opposed to him getting more, honestly, for how long he played the character. Against some really crappy odds at times. When his whole Empire essentially stopped showing up to support him. Many of them playing alts. But I don't necessarily think he got shorted.
Rhone got Shokai's tattoo, which is a nigh impossibility these days. He also got imm lovin' for leading the group that was the first to kill Tiamat. He got an OP 1000xp bonus for being long lived and a good leader, like Tavlin got. He got immxp for various RP opportunities and quests ala Sivyh up above.
And I wouldn't have been opposed to him getting more, either. But I don't necessarily think he got shorted.
Gurzgred got Maranated "early". He got edgepoints via a quest. He got Captain'd despite an early rage delete. He got immxp for RP. He got an absolute TON of immteraction via the whole Borkahd thing, and then a CON quest. All in just over 300 hours. And most actually was done pre-200 hours.
I could go on but I'm done.
|
|
|
|
|
Dallevian | Sun 16-Oct-11 11:49 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40730, "Not flaming but..."
In response to Reply #0
|
within 30 minutes of adding my role yesterday I got 1500 immexp. I bet I get inducted within 30 minutes of seeing my cabal leader too or barring that I imagine the cabal imm will induct me within 2 hours.
Sometimes it just goes that way.
Sometimes it is like other characters where I go 20 hours without role immexp, never see the cabal leader and am thoroughly ignored out of no merit of my own. CF is weird like that.
I for one wish Tavlin had been a lich and people grew the balls to gank the piss out of him like they did lichees of old. A soft player base and anti-gank code allowed Tavlin to thrive.
|
|
|
|
|
Rayihn | Sun 16-Oct-11 06:44 AM |
Member since 08th Oct 2006
1147 posts
| |
|
#40724, "Now I wish I'd given him that lich quest"
In response to Reply #0
|
This is just ironic on many levels - but a few facts:
An immortal can NEVER see an IP address of another immortal higher level than him. So while it may have been pretty obvious later in life, no one knew who Tavlin was at first.
It's considered kind of a "faux pas" upstairs in Asgaard for a lower level imm to ask or even talk to a higher level imm about their morts.
It might have been easy later to guess that it was Twist, but there's no way anyone knew at level 20 or 3 hours or whatever. There's no special flag that says "Hey I'm an imm flag my shiz!!".
Twist actually wanted to lich quest and I specifically suggested he go mummy instead so there would be no cries of unfairness about how that was handled. In many situations, Tavlin did NOT receive rewards because it was known who he was (again LATER in the char's life).
It frankly sucks that we have to go out of our way to not reward imm mortals "too much" and have to tip toe around things the way we do. But I don't know the solution - you can be like Daevryn and just be too burned out by the drama to kype to a character or like Twist and just weather the storm.
End of story, Tavlin deserved more than what he got.
|
|
|
|
  |
MoetEtChandon | Sun 16-Oct-11 10:34 AM |
Member since 26th Jul 2010
293 posts
| |
|
#40729, "Vocal minority at it again, I guess"
In response to Reply #39
|
I'm amazed Twist even finds enjoyment in playing, knowing what he knows. And not only that, he does it regularly with high quality characters that up the bar.
So, if that brings an extra level of danger, challenge and excitement to the game, I don't see how you can be against that. Actual cheating would have to be handled, ofcourse, but that being the case just seems unlikely.
It's more like seeing the same old guys keeping the same 10/15+ year old grudges alive and well, for whatever reason.
|
|
|
|
  |
|
#40737, "So wait..."
In response to Reply #39
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 01:35 PM
|
I'm not saying anything about him cheating cause I digged Tavlin and agree with you.
But you say no IMM can see the IP of any IMM higher than them? Like on Nukhav's PBF you said something about having a salty taste in your mouth that he had a well houred alt and blah blah so you guys obviously IP check. But I mean, Twist has played countless characters, I doubt you guys don't recognize his IP by now. And if you're saying it just doesn't come up even on the mort, then you would still know it's an IMM higher than you.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:26 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40758, "RE: So wait..."
In response to Reply #49
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 07:26 PM
|
> I doubt you guys don't recognize >his IP by now.
Speaking for myself, there literally is no one whose IP I recognize on sight.
(What's much more common is a given player's playstyle is something I can recognize on sight, which I then may confirm via IPs if I have any doubt. For example, I have no idea where Funnyone plays from or what his IP is, but if I see even one tell from him I usually know right away.)
|
|
|
|
|
Reksah | Sat 15-Oct-11 11:16 PM |
Member since 30th Apr 2011
94 posts
| |
|
#40715, "RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this...."
In response to Reply #0
|
As a new imm it is disheartening to immediately face accusations of cheating. It certainly does little to encourage me to contribute in any way to the game.
You and some others are convinced there is a conspiracy here and no further fortification of the truth will change your mind, so instead I will ask you for your advice regarding the matter you felt compelled to bring up.
What changes would you see made to the system to prevent this from happening again? Would you have these changes only be applied to immortals, or to all characters?
|
|
|
|
  |
TMNS | Sat 15-Oct-11 11:27 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40717, "Seriously dude, don't listen to Torak."
In response to Reply #30
|
Seriously.
Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
    |
Torak | Sun 16-Oct-11 12:10 AM |
Member since 15th Feb 2007
1216 posts
| |
|
#40719, "Ok whoa whoa, #### off"
In response to Reply #32
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 12:11 AM
|
Seriously, I *never* said he cheated. I said people claimed he cheated - I just was not overly surprised an Immortal played a character that got insane early loving like that. I also said repeatedly, here and in his goodbye that Tavlin was an awesome character - it's just that his rise to fame was pretty insanely fast for most standards.
My only real suggestion is just some kind of standard pacing established. Randomly giving someone 1k immexp for really nothing is pretty nuts and probably should be looked at (a 33% gain in immexp, putting him over the top of most lifers, for 75 hours of 18 kills and no role updates?). As I said about the other, Tavlin did deserve the early rewards but it doesn't surprise me of his background for them.
I've seen awesome characters from many people and the love just isn't....well, normal across the board. I really don't know how to fix it.
Anyways, enough rambling. As I said I knew I'd get flamed for this but not this bad. Tavlin was awesome - he got some really nuts loving. I never said it was BECAUSE he was an Immortal, I said I wasn't surprised he WAS one. IT IS NOT SOME CONSPIRACY.
Sheesh!
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sun 16-Oct-11 01:28 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40721, "RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this...."
In response to Reply #30
|
Well maybe posting this who quest outside of facebook, many of us aren't on it would have encouraged more people to take part and Twist wouldn't have had to jump in and go with it. Seems like most people had no idea about it. As for everything else, it just seems like certain characters get a ridiculous amount of perks and goodies while the rest of us get next to nothing. The problem is most likely that Imms know how to game a system in the sense that they know what to say, do, and write to get other imms to pony up the good stuff that most of us non-imms can't come close to. In 15 years of playing I have never had even my best characters get a fraction of the rewards that some of these uber characters have gotten. Maybe I'm just terrible at the game, but sometimes it feels like the rich always get richer. Not to pick on Twist because I do think he is a great Imm, but he fesses up to his char so it's easier to spot. But if I get one of these perks in an entire char life it's a big deal.
Hunsobo: Tat'd, extra Legacy, bunch of special edges, special desc, Emperor, RC winner, more imm xp then 10 normal char combined in fact in a 2 hour period alone he got 4500 imm xp which is 1200 more then my current titled char has all together in 350 hours.
Feilinal: Tat'd, Extra legacy, Cabal Edged, Sunwarden First nonrole imm xp 7 hours, ton of imm xp
Woldrum: Tat'd, Extra Legacy, Extra Weapon Spec, lots of bonus edges, RC winner, got con even before he finished his con quest, 10x a normal char imm xp, Commander of Battle
Hanord: Tat'd, cabal edged, Emperor, special desc, First norole Imm Xp 2 hours, probably an RC winner too, ton of Imm xp. Rumor has it Ckath wanted someone else for War Master but Enlilth stepped in and made them fight for it and Hanord won.
Tavlin: Tat'd, cabal edged, 22 hours Advisor, inducted scion in 3 hours, first imm xp 3 hours, RC winner(comment missing from PBF about what he got), special desc, +con power for mummies, was offered a tour of the Shadow Plane
These are all great characters, I'm not arguing that point at all and I'm sure I could find non Imms who have gotten some nice perks. Just sometimes seems excessive on characters who are already beating everyone's ass to just heaping the rewards on them like this.
My solution would to be spread out the love a little more and if there is some kind of special Imm quest maybe not always have other Imms be the main protagonist which seems to happen a ton. Again sorry Twist not trying to shine a spot light on you. Flame Away.
That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
    |
Twist | Sun 16-Oct-11 11:55 AM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#40732, "RE: I'm going to be flamed to high hell for this...."
In response to Reply #36
|
>Hunsobo: Tat'd, extra Legacy, bunch of special edges, special >desc, Emperor, RC winner, more imm xp then 10 normal char >combined in fact in a 2 hour period alone he got 4500 imm xp >which is 1200 more then my current titled char has all >together in 350 hours.
Hunsobo (and several other characters at the time) benefitted from being an active character when edges were first introduced. So pre-edges, he was getting what would now be considered to be ludicrous amounts of immxp for things. At the time he was getting the xp, it really had no effect whatsoever on gameplay. This is part of the reason the immxp add amounts have been tweaked so that imms have a standard - previously some imms would give like 5000xp for a role they liked, and others would give 1000. If you look at other big name characters pre-edges, you'll see similar amounts.
>Feilinal: Tat'd, Extra legacy, Cabal Edged, Sunwarden First >nonrole imm xp 7 hours, ton of imm xp
>Woldrum: Tat'd, Extra Legacy, Extra Weapon Spec, lots of bonus >edges, RC winner, got con even before he finished his con >quest, 10x a normal char imm xp, Commander of Battle
>Hanord: Tat'd, cabal edged, Emperor, special desc, First >norole Imm Xp 2 hours, probably an RC winner too, ton of Imm >xp. Rumor has it Ckath wanted someone else for War Master but >Enlilth stepped in and made them fight for it and Hanord won.
Pretty sure your rumor is false. At least, that's how Ckath put it to me.
>Tavlin: Tat'd, cabal edged, 22 hours Advisor, inducted scion >in 3 hours, first imm xp 3 hours, RC winner(comment missing >from PBF about what he got), special desc, +con power for >mummies, was offered a tour of the Shadow Plane
For winning the RC Tavlin got two edges, one was the cabal edge you mention, one was the edge that makes your PWK and PWD more potent.
Given that, since you're "not trying to shine a spot light on me" but are managing to do so anyway, I'd like you to compare JUST my own characters. Compare Tavlin's amount of rewards to Woldrun and Hunsobo, and tell me if you think they are equal, or if Tavlin got less than the other two.
>These are all great characters, I'm not arguing that point at >all and I'm sure I could find non Imms who have gotten some >nice perks. Just sometimes seems excessive on characters who >are already beating everyone's ass to just heaping the rewards >on them like this.
MY suggestion would be for you to examine the characters you think got a ton of imm rewards (not just mine) and see if you can find a common thread. I can. Almost all of them are character who were played to the exclusion of any alts, which in turn made it so they clearly played at all kinds of odds. Also they were characters that could turn cabal wars around just by logging in.
Three that I'm thinking of that got a fair amount of complaining about:
Paraliout, Niheriva, Flaaayin.
All three of these were extremely well rp'd, extremely pk-competant, and very good about playing regardless of odds. And all of them got rewards that some considered excessive but in reality probably weren't.
|
|
|
|
      |
Amberion | Sun 16-Oct-11 04:09 PM |
Member since 06th Jun 2007
945 posts
| |
|
#40741, "As Ckath I'll try to remember what happened."
In response to Reply #45
|
I think it was something like me promising two people warmaster. Or at least one of them. Then to have some fun with it I decided that those two should fight over it. Enlilth had nothing to do with it, no imm did.
I wanted the warrior to become warmaster really, and thought the fight would be super easy... The poor warrior ran out of detect invis potions and the bard used that to gain an advantage. Quite a big one, and won. Was kinda bummed out at the moment, yet I was laughing in my chair about it as the warrior told me that he had just given a prep-sack filled with detect invis potions to the bard minutes prior to the battle. Always shoot first and then call whatever you hit the target.
|
|
|
|
          | |
          |
Dallevian | Sun 16-Oct-11 09:23 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40766, "I thought Flaaayin and para were the same player."
In response to Reply #63
|
an ex imm at that
great player
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
DurNominator | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:21 AM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#40777, "I'm with the Forsaken here."
In response to Reply #81
|
Can you point out to me the post where this guy you're 99.9% positive about fessed up Flaaayin?
|
|
|
|
                |
TMNS | Mon 17-Oct-11 01:49 AM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40779, "No one fessed up to the Flaaayin."
In response to Reply #88
|
I am just saying, the style of both of those characters was a bit different.
I know who the Forsaken thinks played both of those characters, and I agree with him on Paralouit. I disagree that the same player played both of those characters though.
So what I am saying is I am 99.9% positive I know who Flaaayin is, but I'll never truly know unless the player fesses up to him.
|
|
|
|
            |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:20 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40794, "The were both Katholas(sp?) the ex-Imm"
In response to Reply #77
|
And I'm pretty sure he is still buddy buddy with alot of the staff, or at least a few key members. So if anything that proves my point. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
              |
Daevryn | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:35 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40797, "RE: The were both Katholas(sp?) the ex-Imm"
In response to Reply #95
|
Source/proof? I don't think either of those characters is really his style.
|
|
|
|
                | |
                  |
Daevryn | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:08 AM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40807, "RE: I always thought he was Paralouit."
In response to Reply #100
|
I didn't see a huge amount of Flaaayin, but I spent a fair amount of time talking to Paraloiut and just did not get the Khaso vibe.
I've been wrong about this kind of thing before, and maybe I am again here, but that's my opinion.
|
|
|
|
          |
Lhydia | Sun 16-Oct-11 09:25 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2391 posts
| |
|
#40767, "Indeed Stevers is not an IMM and I heard he played Nihe..."
In response to Reply #63
|
|
|
            |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 10:28 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40769, "What the #### happened to you man?"
In response to Reply #78
|
You're such an asshole now. I remember when we used to talk over IM's and you were all goofy and happy go lucky.
Now you're just a giant douchey twat. Go you?
|
|
|
|
              |
DurNominator | Mon 17-Oct-11 12:24 AM |
Member since 08th Nov 2004
2018 posts
| |
|
#40778, "I'll take this as jalim fessing up Wiril. nt"
In response to Reply #80
|
|
|
              |
Dallevian | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:18 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40793, "Didn't he get married? : ) nt"
In response to Reply #80
|
|
|
    |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 01:25 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40736, "Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's loving....."
In response to Reply #36
|
...and that's mitigated by the fact he was in Battle (who needs all the love they can get).
Something you don't mention about any of these characters is they were all long-lived (300+ hrs) and leaders of cabals. If you look at a sampling of leader chars with +300 hrs, you'll find what Twist got isn't out of the realm of average amoungst those chars.
Seriously. This just seems like a bunch of sour grapes for you folks. It's like 'Waaah, Twist got way more rewards than I did, he cheats, you immortals are ####'.
Maybe the answer is just Twist is that much better at CF than you.
|
|
|
|
      |
ORB | Sun 16-Oct-11 04:48 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40744, "RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi..."
In response to Reply #48
|
No offense but between you and daurwyn we could see who suckles the Imm nuts the hardest, and I think you'd win, so I'm not really shocked you disagree. I never said Twist cheats, I said Imms tend to heap rewards on the same characters. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
        |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 04:56 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40746, "Hahahahahahahahahahahaha."
In response to Reply #55
|
Yeah, I love the IMMs so much I posted a 7000 word diatribe against several of them and quit the game for 5 months.
The answer to this is, I'm mature enough (most of the time) to look at things objectively, and it's obvious that you along with several other players cannot (or will not...I'm unsure). Do I think Twist has advantages over 99% of the mortals on CF? Yes, because Twist HAS PLAYED THIS GAME SINCE IT WAS IN BETA. He doesn't have to be an IMP to be a badass player. He's forgotten more things than I've probably ever learned on CF.
Sometimes the RNG is not in your favor. And that's not just on skills/battles, that's in everyday CF life. You could have an awesome role idea for a class/race, and it would play completely different at two different times of the year based on who your enemies would be, who is playing those enemies, who your allies would be, who is playing those allies, etc.
I'd argue someone like Yhorian or Shamamman has received just as much love from the IMMs throughout all of their characters, but those dudes aren't as good at PK or aren't IMMs (heh) so they don't catch any flak.
|
|
|
|
          |
Vortex Magus | Sun 16-Oct-11 06:54 PM |
Member since 20th Apr 2005
400 posts
| |
|
#40755, "I was actually thinking of lightmage n/t"
In response to Reply #57
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 06:54 PM
|
|
|
            |
TMNS | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:44 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40762, "He's just the best writer on CF."
In response to Reply #66
|
Seriously. His roles are OMFGBBQ good.
|
|
|
|
              |
Daevryn | Sun 16-Oct-11 08:12 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40764, "Give him a little more credit than that:"
In response to Reply #73
|
He has (had?) a talent for coming up with a character/RP concept that would set him clearly apart from all other characters of the time, in a good way, and put the energy into it in play to really bring it to life.
|
|
|
|
                | |
      |
Daevryn | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:35 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40760, "RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi..."
In response to Reply #48
|
>If >you look at a sampling of leader chars with +300 hrs, you'll >find what Twist got isn't out of the realm of average amoungst >those chars.
This. If you're leader leader (not like provincial or sect leader but at the very top level of your cabal) and you're long lived and you're decent at RP or PK at all, some kind of love will tend to flow to you.
Some people tend to play characters that are more purely invested into PK or are more under the radar. They tend not to get as much stuff. I'm certainly in this mold myself - I'd be hard pressed to name the last character of mine that got some kind of extra thing that didn't come from a role contest win.
|
|
|
|
          |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:09 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40808, "RE: Of these, I only have a problem with Woldrun's lovi..."
In response to Reply #74
|
Yes but what I like about you is that you are very good about spreading the love. I honestly think the village is usually one of the best examples of fairly rewarding lots of people instead of piling it on one or two favorites. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
        |
ORB | Mon 17-Oct-11 10:39 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40813, "I disagree."
In response to Reply #71
|
See this is where I have the issue. Take my example of Sivyh he age died and was very good rp/pk and was a game changer but as far as I see he got no perks at all. Also others like Mharlndarn, Rhone, Ghurzghred, to a lesser extent Mundin. All long lived leaders who were above average and got no special perks at all as far as I can see. That's where I'm seeing the disconnect. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
  |
fist-law | Sun 16-Oct-11 01:51 AM |
Member since 30th Sep 2011
149 posts
| |
|
#40723, "Hrm"
In response to Reply #30
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 01:56 AM
|
I don't think there was any wrong-doing. Nor do I think Torak was saying there was. He was pointing out that people might get that idea, though. Don't sweat it Reksah, everyone is glad that both you and Twist are around.
Many players feel like they get overlooked though. I feel like it quite a bit, insofar as rewards go.
I've never had an extra legacy, cool ability, quest form, etc., and I've played since the mid-90's and have led cabals, had oodles of tats, etc. It's those ultra-cool (beyond tat), UNIQUE things that everyone would like to get more of a piece of.
I think most of us realize that's just the way the cookie crumbles and it's not really anyone's fault.
|
|
|
|
|
Splntrd | Sat 15-Oct-11 10:14 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
| |
|
#40712, "As a devil's advocate example..."
In response to Reply #0
|
-Within 3 hours played time, you received role exp (1500) and immteraction experience (500) and were inducted into Scion. Your character role and character hadn't been alive for even a full day of real life time (not game time).
I am by no means a successful well-known player of any kind. I have a couple no-name heroes under my belt, and a bunch of relatively unimportant mid-level heralds I've had fun with.
But I have received role exp and interaction on my character's first log-on session before - so even though the induct is an interesting bone to toss, I don't really see this as any sign of anything. Extremely uncommon - but probably not unjustified considering the quality and especially the content of the role. Splntrd
|
|
|
|
|
Explosion | Sat 15-Oct-11 01:56 PM |
Member since 06th Jul 2011
381 posts
| |
|
#40691, "Disagree, reasons inside."
In response to Reply #0
Edited on Sat 15-Oct-11 02:00 PM
|
Though i'm sure as hell there is some shady games behind the scenes, i totally disagree with your arguments. And this is why:
1. I am pretty sure that i am being threatened as one of the worst players in the game; 2. I am pretty sure imms quite dislike me (mostly for my topics on those forums); 3. But despite that, almost all my characters getting immexp bonuses for roles in the same session i've add them, or next one. I am getting from 500 to 1500. Keep in mind that my roles are terrible due to my poor knowledge of english.
So, knowing Twist, knowing his ability to RP, after reading his role - does that really surprising that he got so many immexp?
Lastly, my current active character got 5000 immexp at the same time as Twist (about 280 hours i think). And this is only a mid of my character's life (maybe closer to the end - but far not the end yet). AND keep in mind points 1. and 2.
And i do not think it is something unique. If you play, if you put effort, if you are effective, if you have a good role and stay in role - no matter of who you are you will have immexp. Tested by me - believe me, if *I* have it, everyone else should have *a lot* more immlove.
Edited to add: i'm talking about current rewards, where cap is 2000 immexp for something amazing, and normal rewards from 300 to 800 (while earleir i've been receiving and 2k, and 4k, and 6k immexp per reward, but as i understand, stakes are not so high nowdays and 400 immexp is good).
|
|
|
|
|
Vortex Magus | Sat 15-Oct-11 09:18 AM |
Member since 20th Apr 2005
400 posts
| |
|
#40686, "I -do- think Tavlin got rewarded pretty damn hard prett..."
In response to Reply #0
|
I also think he was a quality character and that sometimes, characters just have it all lined up for them in a row.
If Twist just played one mortal every 2 or 3 years and they were all rewarded this damn fast, that'd be a little sketchy. But he's played tons of mortals, at a very consistent rate over the past several years. And almost none of them reached the notoriety that Tavlin has.
And although most of them are very high quality characters, I don't think any of them were even really close to the standard of reward + power Tavlin achieved. Maybe Hunsobo and one or two others. And you can't even attribute Hunsobo's leader position to pure immproval, because Imms can't really rig the votes for emperor, thats almost entirely in mortal hands.
So I think its more that Twist continually churns out pretty decent characters and occasionally one gets recognized and rewarded like crazy, but I think other people who churn out quality characters in a consistent way could do the same. I mean, Reksah's already run his necro quest so I don't think anyone else is going to advisor in 20 hours, but...
Long story short, I think my point is that anyone who throws out characters with strong presence, PK skill, and quality RP is going to eventually get some crazy rewards on their hands too.
I don't think its really imm connections which made Twist characters so successful, though I suppose there's a definite advantage from seeing things with an imm perspective - you'll know which roles are boring and which roles are not, what kind of character is annoying and what kind of behaviors are not, and can freely plagiarize some really good RP ideas while snooping people
|
|
|
|
  |
Daevryn | Sat 15-Oct-11 07:29 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40709, "RE: I -do- think Tavlin got rewarded pretty damn hard p..."
In response to Reply #6
|
>If Twist just played one mortal every 2 or 3 years and they >were all rewarded this damn fast, that'd be a little sketchy. >But he's played tons of mortals, at a very consistent rate >over the past several years. And almost none of them reached >the notoriety that Tavlin has.
That's the main thing I think people always miss.
Without taking the time to search old forums / pbf's, most people will be lucky to name more than 2-3 characters I've played in the last ten years.
I've played probably a hundred characters in the last ten years. The ones where timing or luck worked out my way on the important stuff are the ones you can name.
I'd bet most people can't do much better with Twist, and unlike me he cops to most of his post-deletion which should make it ridiculously easy.
|
|
|
|
    |
Dallevian | Sat 15-Oct-11 08:57 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40710, "name a few?"
In response to Reply #24
|
just out of curiosity sake
I can't recall any since your elf warrior and gay storm giant. Would love to know.
|
|
|
|
      |
TMNS | Sat 15-Oct-11 09:14 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40711, "I know for a fact he had a battle scout thief..."
In response to Reply #25
|
...and a Nexus Arial assassin.
He actually admitted to those ones.
|
|
|
|
        |
Dallevian | Sat 15-Oct-11 11:11 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1643 posts
| |
|
#40714, "was one"
In response to Reply #26
|
kimemrak (neat role and 42-0)?
|
|
|
|
          |
TMNS | Sat 15-Oct-11 11:26 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40716, "Yep. He copped to it too."
In response to Reply #29
|
I think in another thread, whereas he says something like 'I had an assassin that recently autoed...'.
I may be mis-remembering, but he definitely copped to that arial assassin in Nexus.
|
|
|
|
            |
Rayihn | Sun 16-Oct-11 06:57 AM |
Member since 08th Oct 2006
1147 posts
| |
|
#40725, "That was 4? 5? years ago?"
In response to Reply #31
|
And people still accuse him of cheating with that char. There's NO reason for him to tell you guys who he plays beyond wanting to enflame the conspiracy theorists. And that's too bad really.
|
|
|
|
              | |
              |
lasentia | Sun 16-Oct-11 04:58 PM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#40747, "I keep saying imms need to play more mortals."
In response to Reply #40
|
I'd draft them as follows: Fort: Reksah, Thror, Neltouda (we all know they need lovin the most) Empire: Marcatis, Ysal Scion: Zulgh, Enlilth Battle: Twist, Baer Outie: Iunna, Cyradia Nexus: Daev (so he can kill all the other ones) Herald: Scarabeus (for his insane RP skills) And maybe get some others in there too, like Kasty and Amaranthe
I just imagine what those types of chars could do for CF, and I have to admit, it'd be pretty damn sweet. Exceptional RP skills, coupled with decent to insane PK. Yep. Good times. Plus, it's always fun to find out you killed an Imm's mort
|
|
|
|
                | |
                |
Daevryn | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:38 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40761, "RE: I keep saying imms need to play more mortals."
In response to Reply #58
|
Hah I love Nexus. Find a decent, competent, and relatively quiet Nexus character that flames out around level 30 and it's probably me.
Vanguard's about the most underrated cabal power ever.
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sat 15-Oct-11 07:40 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40682, "RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards..."
In response to Reply #2
|
Yeah I agree with this, I don't mind them hooking themselves up within reason. But to pretend that being an Imm doesn't have these kind of perks is just insulting when it's so blatant sometimes. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
    |
Daevryn | Sat 15-Oct-11 07:26 PM |
Member since 13th Feb 2007
11117 posts
| |
|
#40708, "RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards..."
In response to Reply #3
|
What it comes down to is: what you're saying only makes sense if you believe Reksah knew who Tavlin was that early.
Which, maybe I'm wrong, but I don't believe that.
|
|
|
|
  |
Oldril | Sat 15-Oct-11 01:36 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2011
641 posts
| |
|
#40690, "Didnt you cry the same way over the Battle leader?"
In response to Reply #2
|
Every post from you just sounds like oh boo hoo, so and so char got rewards before me or faster than I thought they should have.
You also cried when Ghrimriddor got battle leader early as hell because it wasnt your char and he sure isnt an imm.
|
|
|
|
  |
Zulghinlour | Sun 16-Oct-11 12:41 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
| |
|
#40720, "RE: I don't mind IMM's getting rewards..."
In response to Reply #2
|
>I'm of the don't pee on my head and tell me its rain crowd.
So you're of the "Reksah ####ing cheated to hook Twist up" crowd?
So long, and thanks for all the fish!
|
|
|
|
    |
Lhydia | Sun 16-Oct-11 08:23 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
2391 posts
| |
|
#40727, "Nope. n/t"
In response to Reply #35
|
|
|
      |
SuperIsisMan | Sun 16-Oct-11 01:04 PM |
Member since 22nd Nov 2008
47 posts
| |
|
#40734, "He likes to be peed on is how I read it. nt"
In response to Reply #42
|
Seriously. Just don't tell him it's rain and he's cool with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Tsunami | Sat 15-Oct-11 03:40 AM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#40680, "My best character was "Elorik" in terms of rewards"
In response to Reply #0
|
Looking back at my PBF, I was getting some pretty high rewards for only having barely over 100 hours. 5.6k imm exp. Don't forget I suck at this game.
Other characters that I feel I put similar work into didn't get nearly as much.
I think Twist is just good at the game.
Also, like you said, rewards in general just tend to fluctuate.
|
|
|
|
  |
ORB | Sat 15-Oct-11 07:43 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40683, "RE: My best character was "
In response to Reply #1
|
He had 2k Imm xp and was inducted into Scion within 3 hours of real time, was made advisor at 22 hours! This isn't being good at the game this is having an Imm. Also to say it was the necro quest, almost positive there was a hero necro in Scion at the time already. Love Twist but don't tell us that had nothing to do with that. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
    |
lasentia | Sat 15-Oct-11 09:10 AM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#40685, "There were 0 necros in scion at the time."
In response to Reply #4
|
And he waited before he rolled his necro. Reksah wanted a necromancer, if I had the ability to play the class and not have a mortal I probably would have given it a shot.
In this instance, the opportunity to get those early perks and such were there for the taking. Nobody jumped on it until eventually Twist rolled the necro. Can't hold that against him.
|
|
|
|
    |
Nreykre | Sat 15-Oct-11 09:36 AM |
Member since 05th Apr 2011
90 posts
| |
|
#40687, "FWIW"
In response to Reply #4
|
Time to roll up a necro? the Archmage of Eternal Night: The Omens foretell the dark horror of the grave. The next Advisor will be a necromancer, but there are none that have pledged themselves to our cause of that guild. Be watchful for signs, my scholars. -March 15 at 9:14am
Tavlin rolled on Fri Apr 1st. (That's kind of funny, actually)
IIRC, Reksah's bait didn't get a lot of bites, probably because Scion necro takes a pretty skilled player to pull off, especially with the heat something like this is probably going to put on the character.
Personally, I think anyone who would have taken Reksah up on his offer (so to speak) and had come forward with a decent role, solid RP, etc., would have seen pretty much the same rewards early on. The subsequent stuff probably has a lot to do with Twist just being the veteran he is, but you can't fault a guy for that.
Either way, it was all on the level and even after the player base pretty much ignored the golden opportunity they were given, someone competent stepped forward and helped put Scion back together after what was a pretty bleak time for the cabal and its applicants.
|
|
|
|
      |
ORB | Sat 15-Oct-11 12:09 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40688, "RE: FWIW"
In response to Reply #7
Edited on Sat 15-Oct-11 12:13 PM
|
What's that from, I don't see it in announcements? And you are probably right I'm sure if it was anyone else they would be inducted an hour and change after being eligible. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
        |
Twist | Sat 15-Oct-11 02:18 PM |
Member since 23rd Sep 2006
3431 posts
| |
|
#40692, "I hunted for quite a while before deleting Tavlin..."
In response to Reply #8
|
...because I knew it would come up. And I almost went crazy trying to find it because I was like "did I imagine it? Crap."
But then someone reminded me it was on Facebook. I don't know if it was available anywhere else - if it had been, maybe someone else would have gone for it and Tavlin would have never been.
As it was, I was quite shocked to get the immteraction, induct, and Advisordom as quickly as I did. I sorta knew they'd come if I played ScioNecro and stuck with it (since nobody else was) but it happening that early did surprise me. I don't think it would have been any later if the character had been played by someone else (in a similar fashion), though. Reksah had been waiting for weeks for someone to roll something up. He was ready to induct/Advisinate Oldril's necro, Uhariz, but Oldril didn't want it (see above).
As for the "blame Mharlndarn" comment, I didn't really understand that reticence. I mean, the post essentially said "roll Scion necro and you get to be Advisor". Chancellor cannot uninduct Advisor (or vice versa) so even if you DID have issues with Beront, this is the perfect opportunity to play Scion without having to wait for him to be done with the char...
|
|
|
|
          | |
            | |
          |
Oldril | Sat 15-Oct-11 11:06 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2011
641 posts
| |
|
#40713, "I don't get the hate"
In response to Reply #12
|
I didn't really see anything that Tavlin was getting that screamed unfair. It wasn't like he got the barrier spell during a role contest like Irinam did. Where was the lynch mob then?
|
|
|
|
            | |
              |
ORB | Sun 16-Oct-11 01:30 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#40722, "RE: For the first and only time, I totally agree with t..."
In response to Reply #33
Edited on Sun 16-Oct-11 01:32 AM
|
Well considering I was told it was Twist by someone before he even level 47 it wasn't a big surprise. The point is why does a character that is already steam rolling his entire range on the regular need even more perks? +Con spell? It's like giving the best chess player an extra queen because they kick so much ass already. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
                |
lasentia | Sun 16-Oct-11 07:27 AM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#40726, "You blame Twist for the wrong things."
In response to Reply #37
|
He could clear out his range sure. So what? I never saw him really doing it though. Is it his fault people had no idea how to fight him? Should he have sat back and let himself just get killed?
Perks are rewards for a player that does noticeable things. Tavlin would not have been rewarded if he had 0 RP, multi killed everyone in his range and full sacced them, of that I am positive.
The + con spell? Realy, you're bitching about that? It enhanced his power level pretty much 0%. He was a scion chancellor mummy. He had exactly 0 allies to count on outside his cabal. That none of his enemies killed him is irrelevant. Lots of people got the better of him, he just managed to escape. Sometimes.
Do you think the 3-61 no RP elf squire warrior should just get extra edges, maran status and a third legacy because he's getting his ass whipped reglarly and maybe with that he could win a few more PKs? Or do we accept that some people are better than others, be it in PK or RP and that those things might get them noticed. There are reasons they are called rewards.
Your chess analogy is not really on point. Is chess played against five people against one. You know what, if it were, I'd want a hell of a lot more than just one extra queen to try and do that.
Just stop griping. Really, if you have a char that gets noticed/rewrded- do you pray and say hey Imm, remove that edge you gave me, I'm too strong already and you're just making me stronger! What shifter says no, I don't want a quest form? What warrior turns down a 3rd legacy?
The complaint, if there is a common underlying one at all, is just that these people didn't play the char that got rewarded. I've yet to see any player bitch about their own char being rewarded in any fashion. IF anything, it's the opposite, they bitch cause they don't get what they think they deserve. For a small Imm staff that can only see so much, to me, they do a pretty damn good job of keeping things even and in check across the PB.
|
|
|
|
        |
Onewingedangel | Sat 15-Oct-11 03:03 PM |
Member since 22nd Jul 2009
447 posts
| |
|
#40696, "RE: FWIW"
In response to Reply #8
|
It was on the facebook, I believe.
|
|
|
|
      |
Oldril | Sat 15-Oct-11 01:31 PM |
Member since 20th Jan 2011
641 posts
| |
|
#40689, "Blame Mharlndarn"
In response to Reply #7
|
Scion necro didn't get a lot of bites because no one wanted to be in Beront's characters cabal. You can say RP all you want but I know this is why my char didnt bite on Reksah's bait more and I even put in my role I wasn't gonna try for Scion with Mharlndarn as Chancellor.
Beront will come here and get all defensive over this post but its not meant as a slight on him as a player, just saying why the offer didnt get more bites, to me.
|
|
|
|
        |
TMNS | Sat 15-Oct-11 03:12 PM |
Member since 10th Jun 2009
2670 posts
| |
|
#40697, "Heh. It was supposed to my lowbie Fort pkiller!"
In response to Reply #13
|
But yeah, you're the man Thror. That quest was my high water mark on CF. Even if I hadn't got commander.
|
|
|
|
        |
lasentia | Sat 15-Oct-11 03:23 PM |
Member since 27th Apr 2010
987 posts
| |
|
#40699, "Keep at the globals"
In response to Reply #13
|
Do them when you can, and don't give up on rnadomly involving players. Long ones are nice, but even a small one that is just done in a day is still pretty great (I know it akes a lot to probably set them up and execute it, and you have no guarantee that anyone will really get involved)
To me it is that kind of thing that makes CF so much fun, that something unexpected might happen at any moment.
And come on Thror, do another battle tournament like you did in the sands! That was about the funnest time I had with my herald, and easily one of the best times I've had in CF yet.
No holds barred - no looting risk - twenty people in PK range brawl to the death. Now that's just flat out awesome.
|
|
|
|
          |
The-me | Sat 15-Oct-11 04:37 PM |
Member since 14th Jun 2011
333 posts
| |
|
#40703, "RE: Keep at the globals"
In response to Reply #18
|
The battle in the sands, and the macalla quests were some of the coolest warrior on warrior action I've had in game.
|
|
|
|
            |
Amberion | Sat 15-Oct-11 06:09 PM |
Member since 06th Jun 2007
945 posts
| |
|
#40704, "Yeah! Those things were awesome! N/T"
In response to Reply #21
|
N/T Always shoot first and then call whatever you hit the target.
|
|
|
|
        |
Kalageadon | Sat 15-Oct-11 04:27 PM |
Member since 23rd Oct 2003
1049 posts
| |
|
#40702, "I just dont understand."
In response to Reply #13
|
Every rp chance I get, I try to run or rush into it. If I hear any echos or dreams, gechos, I'm typically all over it. A lot of this time it just isn't something I can jump in, or so it seems. But I've ran or been a part of many quests you or other battle imms have ran in the past and those that brought about legacies. I was there digging trenches trying my hardest hoping I'd be recognized as a sapper during the Sylvan/battle wars. I must have fought those zombies of fallen villagers countless times and jumped against imm controlled mobs during the crash of Nexus/ Warlocks (they finally punted me cause thirst still banes imm spells).
These are among my favorite CF memories, I can care less how many powerful char's I've had in the past that I simply hoped made enough of a name for themselves to be remembered for a while. Folk need to realize that these are the opportunities that can make the difference from bragging about "Oh.. yeah, I killed 200 people" and "Oh, I just heralded in a new age of the game, and ensured my favorite cabal success, resulting in hundreds or thousands of pks."
|
|
|
|
          | |
            |
SideStrider | Mon 17-Oct-11 09:45 AM |
Member since 30th Dec 2007
208 posts
| |
|
#40800, "RE: LOOK AT IT THIS WAY"
In response to Reply #64
|
Yes, I once punched a laptop in the screen and broke it. "Big whup, Wanna fight aboud it?"
|
|
|
|
    |
Tsunami | Mon 17-Oct-11 11:56 AM |
Member since 25th Mar 2008
1509 posts
| |
|
#40822, "So?"
In response to Reply #4
|
I got 2.8k in a matter of 6 hours. 3.6k in a matter of 24 hours. Not to mention more immxp than he had in less than half his character's life time.
Point being, the rewards are there for anyone willing to try for them. I'm also not sure where you are coming from...
Mad because you don't get rewarded like that? Sorry, try harder, there are examples of non-imms getting well rewarded. Even one that had early(ier) leadering.
Mad because Immortals get "unfair advantage" rewards? Sorry, have yet to see it myself. RoC isn't unfair. The low number of immexp he got isn't unfair. He didn't get lich, THAT's unfair. There are examples of non-imms getting similar rewards and even the early(ier?) leadering.
Sounds to me like there are tons of holes in your boat and someone needs to start bailing.
|
|
|
|
|