|
Sarien | Mon 24-Mar-14 11:10 AM |
Member since 14th Feb 2009
740 posts
|     |
|
#54675, "Why not simply automate inductions."
|
Heck,
Automate inductions and make the responsibility of 'leaders' policing rather than vetting.
Too often do you sit around waiting for an induct nowadays, and really...why? Why does it take so long to complete this process? Do I really get anything from the 'RP' when I'm getting inducted into a cabal for the 20th time? No.
Revamp the induction process to basically outline the "rules of a cabal" upon induction and then make leaders the policemen (in addition to immortals) of the cabal
|
|
|
 (AUTO) Cabal Leader Idea
[View all] , Moligant, Mon 24-Mar-14 08:42 AM
  Induction by Vets,
Zephon,
24-Mar-14 03:24 PM, #5
  Vouching system?,
Doof,
26-Mar-14 05:43 AM, #9
I cannot conceive of doing this,
Artificial,
24-Mar-14 12:27 PM, #3
Well then....,
Sarien,
24-Mar-14 01:33 PM, #4
RE: I cannot conceive of doing this,
Doof,
26-Mar-14 05:40 AM, #8
I understand the reluctance to boot someone.,
Sarien,
26-Mar-14 08:14 AM, #10
Why not simply automate inductions.,
Sarien,
24-Mar-14 11:10 AM #2
I like this idea too.,
Perpetual_Noob,
24-Mar-14 07:48 PM, #6
I agree with this. I've been looking for a certain lea...,
Doof,
26-Mar-14 05:36 AM, #7
I disagree,
Akresius,
27-Mar-14 08:52 AM, #11
RE: I disagree,
Sarien,
27-Mar-14 12:30 PM, #12
RE: I disagree,
Akresius,
27-Mar-14 02:09 PM, #13
Hmmm...,
Moligant,
27-Mar-14 03:29 PM, #16
RE: I disagree,
Sarien,
27-Mar-14 03:31 PM, #17
RE: I disagree,
Daevryn,
27-Mar-14 02:57 PM, #14
RE: I disagree,
vargal,
27-Mar-14 03:12 PM, #15
Non-mage hating battle roles,
Moligant,
27-Mar-14 03:45 PM, #19
Alright, I admit..,
Sarien,
27-Mar-14 03:39 PM, #18
RE: Alright, I admit..,
Daevryn,
27-Mar-14 04:31 PM, #20
No argument = no drama = sad (n/t),
Doof,
28-Mar-14 09:08 AM, #21
I like this idea. n/t,
Homard,
24-Mar-14 08:56 AM, #1
| |
|
