|
Splntrd | Wed 17-Mar-10 03:52 PM |
Member since 08th Feb 2004
1096 posts
|    |
|
#31370, "RE: Can we take a vote to remove stoneshatter from mobs? Thanks."
Edited on Wed 17-Mar-10 03:52 PM
|
I'm not really for or against it, but in what way is stoneshatter different from eq burning (which was removed not too long ago) that would make you want to keep stoneshatter but do away with eq burning?
I agree that "stoneshatter is annoying" may not be a strong enough argument unto itself to justify its removal. But I always thought the reason eq burning was removed was to encourage people to explore the new dragon lairs; the same argument could be used for stoneshatter.
Splntrd
|
|
|
 Can we take a vote to remove stoneshatter from mobs? Th...
[View all] ,  _Magus_guest (Guest), Wed 17-Mar-10 10:58 AM
  Don't forget shapeshifters,
Valkenar,
18-Mar-10 08:06 AM, #6
Eh,
Guy (Guest),
17-Mar-10 04:28 PM, #4
  Yeah... Have you tried going through 2 certain duergar ...,
Arrna (Guest),
18-Mar-10 03:06 PM, #7
RE: Can we take a vote to remove stoneshatter from mobs...,
Daevryn,
17-Mar-10 11:20 AM, #1
RE: Can we take a vote to remove stoneshatter from mobs...,
Splntrd,
17-Mar-10 03:52 PM #2
It's different because you can remove stuff,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
17-Mar-10 04:01 PM, #3
In one sense I agree, in another I don't...,
Arrna (Guest),
18-Mar-10 03:12 PM, #8
What about making them temporary affects?~,
ibuki,
18-Mar-10 04:36 PM, #9
Idea for dent,
Valkenar,
18-Mar-10 04:58 PM, #10
RE: Idea for dent,
Daevryn,
18-Mar-10 06:22 PM, #11
Make dent one round,
JMCCC (Guest),
18-Mar-10 08:11 PM, #13
RE: Idea for dent,
Isildur,
19-Mar-10 12:11 AM, #15
More or less intentional,
Valkenar,
19-Mar-10 08:31 AM, #16
I imagine that is because,
Daurwyn2 (Guest),
18-Mar-10 07:53 PM, #12
RE: In one sense I agree, in another I don't...,
Isildur,
19-Mar-10 12:09 AM, #14
EQ burning was removed LONG before the dragon lairs wer...,
trewyn,
17-Mar-10 11:37 PM, #5
| |
|
