Subject: "Was thinking more about non-optimnal groups < 3 in a group" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23000
Show all folders

AbernyteFri 05-Dec-08 03:46 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
973 posts 		Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#23010, "Was thinking more about non-optimnal groups < 3 in a group"


          

but if people tried to abuse it by making a decent group in 'quiet times' then those times wont be so quiet and the bonus would not apply.

-----Abernyte

  
Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicRelated to the topic below...tedium of getting groups/r... [View all] , Abernyte, Thu 04-Dec-08 04:54 AM
Reply In case of ####ty groups, but not in case of good ones., DurNominator, 04-Dec-08 06:21 PM, #5
Reply Was thinking more about non-optimnal groups < 3 in a g..., Abernyte, 05-Dec-08 03:46 AM #6
Reply Slight Alternative, BaronMySoul (Anonymous), 04-Dec-08 11:42 AM, #3
Reply Our perma is so going to power rank., GinGa, 04-Dec-08 10:11 AM, #2
Reply I don't think we have ever been on the same side, ever!..., Abernyte, 04-Dec-08 01:09 PM, #4
Reply Good idea, incognito, 04-Dec-08 05:14 AM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #23000 Previous topic | Next topic