Subject: "RE: Imms?" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #958
Show all folders

ZulghinlourSun 11-May-03 05:00 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
9792 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#984, "RE: Imms?"


          

>Just out of curiosity, what does no response mean? Does it
>mean that some of you imms have read it and disagree? Agree
>but aren't motivated to write? Nobody reads?

It most likely means it has been read and given the amount of scrutiny it deserves. I read the forums every single day.

>I've always wondered why you don't reply to each and every
>gameplay and ask immortal post.

I always wonder why mortals think they are entitled to everything.

>At the very least to note it had been read.

Because it is a better use of my time than coding, or fixing bugs, or updating areas, or ...

>I mean, the stated purpose of the forum
> gameplay and ask imm) is to discuss and question the game
>with _imms_.

And lots of posts do get responses. And things that really don't strike chords with someone usually get left alone.

>When people post to those forums I think it
>would be good if one of the imms could simply post "Read and
>taken under advisement." Or "Not going to happen, sorry." Or
>"Wow, how could we never have thought of that." or whatever.

I'll make sure to set up an autoposter for me that says "Read and circular filed"

>Just something to show the person it's not in a vacuum.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicCity Guard Alignment [View all] , Graatch (inactive user), Thu 08-May-03 09:56 AM
Reply Responding to the actual idea., Quislet, 11-May-03 09:27 PM, #16
Reply An argument in favor, Ulthur, 12-May-03 08:28 AM, #18
     Reply RE: An argument in favor, Quislet, 12-May-03 04:20 PM, #19
          Reply RE: An argument in favor, Ulthur, 13-May-03 09:02 AM, #20
               Reply RE: An argument in favor, Quislet, 16-May-03 02:33 PM, #21
Reply Graatch I read your post, and I don't ####ing care (n/t..., Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:01 PM, #10
Reply Imms?, (NOT Graatch), 11-May-03 01:52 PM, #5
Reply A reply!, Valguarnera, 11-May-03 02:07 PM, #6
Reply So., Dallevian, 11-May-03 03:26 PM, #7
     Reply RE: So., Valguarnera, 11-May-03 03:47 PM, #8
          Reply Err., Dallevian, 11-May-03 05:55 PM, #12
Reply RE: Imms?, Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:00 PM #9
     Reply RE: Imms?, (NOT Graatch), 11-May-03 07:03 PM, #13
          Reply RE: Imms?, Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 07:17 PM, #14
               Reply Graatch, quit wasting valuable time., Quislet, 11-May-03 09:16 PM, #15
               Reply How DARE you.., Nightgaunt_, 12-May-03 01:44 AM, #17
Reply Uhh, weren't you banned?, Rade, 08-May-03 11:59 AM, #3
Reply RE: Uhh, weren't you banned?, (NOT Graatch), 08-May-03 02:37 PM, #4
     Reply I read this post too, and still don't ####ing care (n/t..., Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:02 PM, #11
Reply I'll second that, Ulthur, 08-May-03 11:39 AM, #2
Reply I agree, although, incognito, 08-May-03 11:26 AM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #958 Previous topic | Next topic