Subject: "RE: So." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #958
Show all folders

ValguarneraSun 11-May-03 03:47 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#982, "RE: So."


          

You'll 'fix' stuff that isn't broken and really doesn't make the game any better (silver spirits comes to mind), but ignore other things that actually make sense?

Not that I know what you're talking about regarding spirits, but it's pretty obvious the immortals don't sit around and think of things to change for no reason. The only thing I could think of is that a while back they were worth way, way more XP than equivalently dangerous NPCs and they were put back in line with the usual scale.

As for Graatch's argument, I could argue that good-aligned people would be more inclined to take up protective roles. I could also argue it his way. My overriding argument is that the area designers intended for them to be that alignment, and we respect that. When I see a post like that, and it's not really in my 'area', I don't respond. When a bunch of immortals all do the same, we're basically waiting for someone else to take care of it. If most people feel neutral or opposed, there's no sense adding to the workload when there's a number of things we could work on that we agree is a good thing.

Oh, this reminds me to make a rant post

Or just make a normal post.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicCity Guard Alignment [View all] , Graatch (inactive user), Thu 08-May-03 09:56 AM
Reply Responding to the actual idea., Quislet, 11-May-03 09:27 PM, #16
Reply An argument in favor, Ulthur, 12-May-03 08:28 AM, #18
     Reply RE: An argument in favor, Quislet, 12-May-03 04:20 PM, #19
          Reply RE: An argument in favor, Ulthur, 13-May-03 09:02 AM, #20
               Reply RE: An argument in favor, Quislet, 16-May-03 02:33 PM, #21
Reply Graatch I read your post, and I don't ####ing care (n/t..., Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:01 PM, #10
Reply Imms?, (NOT Graatch), 11-May-03 01:52 PM, #5
Reply A reply!, Valguarnera, 11-May-03 02:07 PM, #6
Reply So., Dallevian, 11-May-03 03:26 PM, #7
     Reply RE: So., Valguarnera, 11-May-03 03:47 PM #8
          Reply Err., Dallevian, 11-May-03 05:55 PM, #12
Reply RE: Imms?, Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:00 PM, #9
     Reply RE: Imms?, (NOT Graatch), 11-May-03 07:03 PM, #13
          Reply RE: Imms?, Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 07:17 PM, #14
               Reply Graatch, quit wasting valuable time., Quislet, 11-May-03 09:16 PM, #15
               Reply How DARE you.., Nightgaunt_, 12-May-03 01:44 AM, #17
Reply Uhh, weren't you banned?, Rade, 08-May-03 11:59 AM, #3
Reply RE: Uhh, weren't you banned?, (NOT Graatch), 08-May-03 02:37 PM, #4
     Reply I read this post too, and still don't ####ing care (n/t..., Zulghinlour, 11-May-03 05:02 PM, #11
Reply I'll second that, Ulthur, 08-May-03 11:39 AM, #2
Reply I agree, although, incognito, 08-May-03 11:26 AM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #958 Previous topic | Next topic