Subject: "Standard Reply #289" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #1918
Show all folders

nepentheFri 08-Aug-03 01:32 PM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#1933, "Standard Reply #289"


          


>The evidence is clear, non-tanking classes are obligated to
>spend
>days spamming up defenses early.

You're welcome to draw whatever conclusions you like from your experiences, but don't expect us to take them seriously or change the game as a result if our mileage varies.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicComplaint about Practicing [View all] , Avilion, Thu 07-Aug-03 09:14 PM
Reply You have to consider., ATK, 08-Aug-03 08:01 AM, #7
Reply It rewards the spammer -nt-, Avilion, 08-Aug-03 02:59 PM, #13
Reply You forgot to salient details, Theerkla, 08-Aug-03 07:06 AM, #6
Reply don't spoil a good whine with facts, incognito, 08-Aug-03 11:47 AM, #10
Reply don't bother with defenses as a mage, incognito, 08-Aug-03 06:40 AM, #5
Reply Since this is the most BS post, Avilion, 08-Aug-03 11:35 AM, #8
     Reply wrong, incognito, 08-Aug-03 11:45 AM, #9
     Reply Yea, I dunno what's wrong with me., Avilion, 09-Aug-03 02:07 PM, #14
          Reply I almost always hate to hear a new player leaving CF fo..., Theerkla, 09-Aug-03 04:21 PM, #15
     Reply and regarding tactics..., incognito, 08-Aug-03 11:53 AM, #11
     Reply Standard Reply #289, nepenthe, 08-Aug-03 01:32 PM #12
Reply By design. Perhaps checkers? (n/t), DwE, 07-Aug-03 11:24 PM, #4
Reply RE: Complaint about Practicing, Valguarnera, 07-Aug-03 10:51 PM, #3
Reply RE: Complaint about Practicing, Isildur, 07-Aug-03 10:47 PM, #2
Reply RE: Complaint about Practicing, fleshofchaos, 07-Aug-03 10:11 PM, #1
Top General Discussions Gameplay Topic #1918 Previous topic | Next topic