Lyristeon | Wed 14-Nov-07 09:45 AM |
Member since 02nd Jan 2004
1282 posts
| |
|
#121, "Why I would be against this."
|
The writing of the area is a time consuming activity. Not just the actual writing, but, waiting for reviews, code, etc. In that time you are waiting, you are learning about being an imm. You learn your boundaries, your learn how to deal with situations that players are having, you learn how to deal with problem players, etc. These are not things you can learn by just coming up and be given the rp end of commands.
The next thing is that new imms are required to have a mentor who oversee their progress and make sure they aren't breaking the boundaries. We would have no time to mentor these heroimms who are writing areas and want to learn to move into an admin position. We would be spending all of our time watching the new rp imm to make sure they aren't doing something wrong because all of their time logged in is just towards rp. I know that I don't want to spend my time constantly telling someone what to do or not do when I can just do it myself when I feel it is warranted.
That brings me to another point. Too much immteraction would become passe. Candy is great, but, if you have too much, it becomes bleh.
|
|
|
A Proposal
[View all] , Mekantos, Wed 14-Nov-07 11:44 AM
Why I would be against this.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:45 AM #45
As for me (and other players), there is almost no candy...,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:54 AM, #47
The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 06:20 AM, #39
RE: The question from me!,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:21 AM, #41
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 07:38 AM, #42
RE: The question from me!,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 09:33 AM, #44
RE: The question from me!,
Dervish,
14-Nov-07 09:51 AM, #46
Without going into specifics.,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 11:44 AM, #49
Not I.,
Valguarnera,
08-Nov-07 07:14 AM, #1
RE: Not I.,
Tahren,
08-Nov-07 02:31 PM, #2
Another angle,
Mekantos,
08-Nov-07 03:25 PM, #3
I think you're missing the point.,
Cyradia,
12-Nov-07 05:24 PM, #5
You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:51 PM, #6
You know what, forget it. This is not worth it. -nt-,
Mekantos,
12-Nov-07 07:54 PM, #7
RE: Why areas?,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 07:43 AM, #8
Thank you for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:31 PM, #12
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:13 PM, #17
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #21
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 05:28 PM, #24
RE: Why areas?,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:45 AM, #50
RE: Why areas?,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 01:12 AM, #37
Think systemic:,
Valguarnera,
14-Nov-07 07:11 AM, #40
RE: Think systemic:,
Isildur,
14-Nov-07 09:19 AM, #43
RE: Think systemic:,
Zulghinlour,
14-Nov-07 11:43 AM, #48
RE: Think systemic:,
Lyristeon,
14-Nov-07 02:20 PM, #51
The problem is that mortals cannot empower. nt,
DurNominator,
14-Nov-07 05:44 AM, #38
RE: You put the worst spin imaginable on my post,
Daevryn,
13-Nov-07 09:01 AM, #9
Thanks for a good response -nt-,
Mekantos,
13-Nov-07 12:30 PM, #11
does the immortal staff use a system of continual impro...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 11:40 AM, #10
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 12:45 PM, #13
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 01:56 PM, #14
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 02:16 PM, #15
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Isildur,
13-Nov-07 04:25 PM, #18
RE: does the immortal staff use a system of continual i...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:05 PM, #20
Let me guess, just took a six sigma class? NT,
Dragomir,
13-Nov-07 02:32 PM, #16
actually I major in OEM nt,
laxman,
13-Nov-07 05:07 PM, #22
If you minus the snotty tone, and cocky ass attitude, I...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 05:02 PM, #19
Ninja society...,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:14 PM, #23
I would love.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:44 PM, #25
There is a CF facebook group,
Zulghinlour,
13-Nov-07 05:48 PM, #26
No, thanks.,
Dallevian,
13-Nov-07 05:53 PM, #27
RE: Ninja society...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 06:16 PM, #28
Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 06:48 PM, #29
RE: Re: generalizations,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 07:18 PM, #30
RE: Re: generalizations,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 08:58 PM, #31
Good Post,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 08:59 PM, #32
RE: generalizations,
Valguarnera,
13-Nov-07 09:14 PM, #33
Well, there goes me assuming again..,
TheDude,
13-Nov-07 10:18 PM, #35
That's not the problem...,
Stunna,
13-Nov-07 10:23 PM, #36
One idea I really like...,
Gryshilniar,
13-Nov-07 10:06 PM, #34
RE: Not I.,
colospgsbryan,
08-Nov-07 10:10 PM, #4
| |
|