Subject: "Rot question" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #3052
Show all folders

FacegodThu 06-Jan-11 02:49 PM
Member since 06th Jan 2011
3 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list
#3052, "Rot question"


          

Hello all!

Me and my friend were disputing about rot mechanics and decided to ask here - how does rot works exactly?

He says: each tick there is a check on con. If check failed, con goes down, if not - con remains untouched.

I say: there is no saving throw vs con each tick. If rot is landed, it will decrease con every tick while it's on the character.

Who is right and who is wrong here? Or, if we both are mistaken, how does rot works exactly?

Thanks in advance and happy new year and marry x-mas to everyone!
Cheers,
- A

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

TopicRot question [View all] , Facegod, Thu 06-Jan-11 02:49 PM
Reply Your friend is right, incognito, 01-Feb-11 03:44 PM, #9
Reply and advice relating to your question, Quixotic, 06-Jan-11 06:01 PM, #2
Reply RE: Rot question, Zulghinlour, 06-Jan-11 05:33 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Rot question, Facegod, 06-Jan-11 09:19 PM, #3
          Reply RE: Rot question, Mort, 06-Jan-11 10:12 PM, #4
          Reply This is my experience, incognito, 01-Feb-11 03:47 PM, #10
          Reply Some answers, lasentia, 06-Jan-11 11:00 PM, #5
               Reply RE: Some answers, Facegod, 07-Jan-11 11:14 AM, #6
               Reply RE: Another good question is..., vorian, 09-Jan-11 03:47 PM, #7
                    Reply RE: Another good question is..., Isildur, 09-Jan-11 04:08 PM, #8
                         Reply There are at least 2 other ways (I think), incognito, 01-Feb-11 03:48 PM, #11
               Reply Con check is against actual con, incognito, 01-Feb-11 03:50 PM, #12
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #3052 Previous topic | Next topic