Subject: "Yup. Auto-disconnect." Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #2099
Show all folders

ValguarneraMon 11-Feb-08 08:04 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
6904 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#2125, "Yup. Auto-disconnect."


          

Specifically, the MUD kicked him for entering too many commands. He probably panicked and mashed flee a billion times, or something similar. That's why the 'protected' echo never kicked in-- we don't give it for self-spam. He reconnected right afterwards, and had already died, for about the billionth time. I'm not sure what you expect us to do when we see all of that.

By all means, if someone's link cause them to avoid being killed, feel free to pray about it and have staff look into it. This was just you being vindictive.

------------

In the broader sense, if you can't see about 5000 ways that the incidents between you and this guy could have played out differently, you have serious problems.

Good example, assuming he actually did go OOC towards you:
Pray Hi. (Name) is going OOC towards me. I think he's pretty new here, and might need a talk.

OK example:
Kill them for the affront. Say something IC, then move on to doing anything else.

Your example:
Spend 60 minutes on: Kill them, taunt them, and take their stuff four times in an hour until they stop logging in.

valguarnera@carrionfields.com

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

HOT TopicStarting weapon skill = 75% [View all] , Xenoroyal, Sat 09-Feb-08 08:05 PM
Reply RE: New player retention, Valguarnera, 10-Feb-08 04:03 PM, #11
Reply Priceless. n/t, Lightmage, 10-Feb-08 04:33 PM, #12
Reply Xryss says 'f ucking cunt', Xenoroyal, 10-Feb-08 10:02 PM, #13
     Reply Nope., Valguarnera, 10-Feb-08 10:10 PM, #18
          Reply Log, Xenoroyal, 11-Feb-08 01:50 AM, #19
          Reply Yup. Auto-disconnect., Valguarnera, 11-Feb-08 08:04 AM #22
          Reply RE: Nope., Xenoroyal, 11-Feb-08 02:18 AM, #20
          Reply I rather have 10 silly newbies., Cerunnir, 11-Feb-08 05:27 AM, #21
          Reply Probably not a coincidence, Xenoroyal, 11-Feb-08 02:16 PM, #26
          Reply seconded, incognito, 11-Feb-08 05:12 PM, #27
          Reply RE: I rather have 10 silly newbies., Isildur, 06-Mar-08 02:16 PM, #31
          Reply RE: Nope., Daevryn, 11-Feb-08 10:01 AM, #23
               Reply ADUH! I thought I was I the only one getting this nt, PSTYX, 11-Feb-08 10:11 AM, #24
               Reply I guess it just bums me out, Xenoroyal, 11-Feb-08 12:55 PM, #25
          Reply RE: Nope., Isildur, 06-Mar-08 02:08 PM, #30
Reply RE: Starting weapon skill = 75%, Daevryn, 10-Feb-08 09:54 AM, #10
Reply That might work even better. n/t, Xenoroyal, 10-Feb-08 09:53 PM, #14
Reply The downside of this:, Rodriguez, 10-Feb-08 06:33 AM, #6
Reply Explain to your friend what he did wrong, DurNominator, 10-Feb-08 02:10 AM, #4
Reply RE: Explain to your friend what he did wrong, Xenoroyal, 10-Feb-08 03:50 AM, #5
     Reply They already have 40% starting skill in one weapon. nt, DurNominator, 10-Feb-08 07:44 AM, #7
     Reply I think you're full of ####, Rogue, 10-Feb-08 07:48 AM, #8
          Reply RE: I think you're full of ####, Xenoroyal, 10-Feb-08 09:55 PM, #15
               Reply RE: I think you're full of ####, Rogue, 10-Feb-08 10:00 PM, #16
                    Reply lol@rogue, I shouldn't have responded n/t, Xenoroyal, 10-Feb-08 10:04 PM, #17
Reply RE: Starting weapon skill = 75%, Dave, 09-Feb-08 09:02 PM, #1
     Reply RE: Starting weapon skill = 75%, PSTYX, 09-Feb-08 11:09 PM, #2
          Reply Because we all know, Xenoroyal, 09-Feb-08 11:56 PM, #3
               Reply RE: Because we all know, PSTYX, 10-Feb-08 08:35 AM, #9
                    Reply RE: Because we all know, Darwinder, 05-Mar-08 12:45 AM, #28
                         Reply Welcome to CF. nt, DurNominator, 05-Mar-08 12:52 PM, #29
Top General Discussions New Player Q&A Topic #2099 Previous topic | Next topic