Subject: "Yeah, that comment was/is odd" Previous topic | Next topic
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend CF Website
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #143684
Show all folders

CalionThu 24-Nov-22 07:11 AM
Member since 04th Mar 2003
367 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list
#143716, "Yeah, that comment was/is odd"


          

If someone wants to go through the hard path of alignment change, I don't get why you'd want to punish them even more. Historically the few who've done that have got their specs/whatnot back in the end, no? And I don't recall anyone becoming an unstoppable uberforce because of that. Besides, the game is NOT RP-only, and putting such a hard-line restriction would only discourage doing something out of the ordinary or actual RP regarding alignment change (not that I would personally ever knowingly try to play such a character).

>The one thing that surprised me was a comment by Ish,
>
>Sat Sep 10 11:18:31 2022 by 'Ishuli' at level 51 (322 hrs):
>This character should never have had their spec skills
>returned, but I noticed too late to stop it and would feel bad
>punishing Quivdereayeh for the mistake.
>
>I don't understand this, you're totally a roleplay character.
>You did not exploit an advantageous race/class combo, such as
>a Good align gnome mage. You basically swopped vuln iron for
>vuln mithril and 1 dex/int swop. Seems a lateral change and
>given you were not a pker there is hardly a benefit.
>
>The only thing I can think of is setting a precedent for more
>exploiter natured players to think they can get specs on a
>align change (eg evil storm giant). But I would have imagined
>they need to play like you get it. Apparently playing like
>you was almost not enough.

  

Alert | IP Printer Friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Topic(CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wayfar... [View all] , Death_Angel, Fri 18-Nov-22 10:40 PM
Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., yrblues, 19-Nov-22 04:57 PM, #1
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Reginold Bryt (Anonymous), 19-Nov-22 07:22 PM, #2
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Gwendelya (Anonymous), 19-Nov-22 09:30 PM, #3
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Oareayatin (Anonymous), 19-Nov-22 09:53 PM, #4
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Tamazin (Anonymous), 20-Nov-22 08:26 AM, #5
     Reply fun, and more importantly..., Dallevian, 20-Nov-22 10:04 AM, #6
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Azorinne, 20-Nov-22 01:47 PM, #7
     Reply RE: (CON LOSS) [FORTRESS] Quivdereayeh Vyr'kyree the Wa..., Odaza (Anonymous), 21-Nov-22 09:01 PM, #8
          Reply Yeah, that comment was/is odd, Calion, 24-Nov-22 07:11 AM #9
Top General Discussions The Battlefield Topic #143684 Previous topic | Next topic