>I thought as an immortal you have access to that
>information?
>Like the last time someone has logged in, ect. So did you
>not
>have that information on hand and just made an off the cuff
>educated guess or did you know he was gone but didn't want
>him
>to lose his leadership because he was nice enough to inform
>you
>of his absense, or did you do it out of spite for our
>characters'
>actions or do you actually not have access to that
>information or did you actually think he was showing up?

Loborguz informed me that he was having trouble with his service
provider and that he would have a difficult time logging on for
a period of time. Again, I can't claim to have been mudding for
8 hours a day during this period, because I was busy graduating,
moving and looking for a job. The times that I did manage to
get online I would see that Loborguz had been online, or he was
online two days prior to my sniffing around. This gave me enough
of a reason to say he's been around.

I'm not really sure of the context of how I responded to Grolg and
Goapa's curiosity about his absence, but given the amount of
respect I had for these two characters, I doubt it was chewing you
out.


>I do agree with Grol on this that I did feel kind of like a
>boob
>when you said that. Because we just wanted what was best for
>the
>village because all we saw was someone who was either a no
>show
>leader or a leader who didn't communicate by notes if he WAS
>showing up, both of which was "bad leadership". But if he
>was not
>showing up and we were right, I think it was very unfair how
>you
>treated us, but yet again that is in the past and I could
>care less.

I understand that you want to do what's best for the village. Both
Sehvoor and Aylkar were in positions of authority and I would have
rather had the both of you at least attempt to speak to them via
notes or actual conversations rather than making decisions for the
village. The fact that you approached me was a good sign, since
that is the next step I would expect in this situation.

Agreed, it is the past. Sometimes I would do things differently,
in this instance I'm not quite sure I would, basically because I'm
not even sure where I seem to have gone wrong.

All we can do is press on and hope things look better in the future.

>As to Grol being booted as Generalship, why not tell him
>straight out what he did wrong?

I gave him a couple of reasons. More than enough reasons to justify
his dismissal. Grolgthus argued, as is his right, then took it to
a public forum. To each his own.

>I personally think it would be a great thing to do so other
>people can see what is expected from them when they take a
>position.

I make it a habit of telling people where they go wrong because
they aren't going to learn if I keep it from them.

Hope that helps.

>Goapa