>The fact that you are coming onto a public forum in order to
>deface
>this individual doesn't make you look any better than what
>you are
>claiming him to be.
>
>
>If you'll notice, I didn't say a word one way or another
>until he felt the need to mention my name and bring me into
>this. I didn't like the character, but until he started
>bringing me into his posts I didn't feel the need to say
>anything one way or another. He was dead and gone, Grolg was
>dead and gone, I was just going to let it go.

But you didn't, nor have you. Instead you've continued to berate
his character, resorting to name-calling that is similar to
fourth-grade immaturity.


>Read this line carefully. Just because you think you can do
>a
>better job then him doesn't mean you don't owe him
>obediance.
>
>And I never was disobedient. Just because I followed orders
>doesn't make him any less of a jackass.

See the above statement.

>Not to sound crude, but you failed as a General. This leaves
>you
>zero credibility and no room to talk.
>
>Yes I failed as General because I didn't approve every
>jackass who applied to the village. In my week or so as
>General every applicant I spoke to was given a quest. Until
>they complete that quest and seek me out again, I have no

So now you are making up the reasons you were removed as a General?
It's easiest to justify your faults if you are the horse's mouth.
There was a lot more to Grolgthus failing as a General than you
think. One being the lack of communication that is essential to
a well-trained army.

>reason to write anything down about them. I approved two of
>the dozens of applicants I spoke to while General. Both of
>them not only were eventually accepted, but both made names
>for themselves. I don't see the point in writing a note for
>every little turd who wanders up and says "I wanna be a
>villager just like you!" What the hell is there to write

The point is that you chose to forgoe the fact that there were
people in a position of authority above you. Instead you cut
the chains of authority and decided you would do things your way.


>until someone has been found worthy? Do you want 500 notes a
>day from your elders saying "Well I spoke to Bob today. He
>seemed pretty damned clueless. He has no grasp of what the
>village is about, and asked if we had dental and optical
>insurance, before wandering off." Hell no. You couple this
>with the near constant fighting that was going on at the
>time, and you have no TIME to write such pointless notes.
>Then you add to all that the fact that YOU said not to
>approve people until they have been tested, and you see
>where we are.
>
>And I really wouldn't talk about credibility Thror. You
>outright lied to Goapa and myself, about Lob having been on,
>then denied it in another post on this thread, then when
>called on that, decided not to respond.

Right, because someone doesn't resort to your petty game of:

'I'm right!'

'No, I'm right!'

...they must be either ashamed or lying? I posted above my thoughts
on your accusations, that should be enough to suffice for an
answer. Regardless, you'll believe what you want.

We've got better things to do with our bandwidth then fan the fire
of your bitter flames.