|
Dallevian | Mon 25-Apr-05 11:57 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1646 posts
| |
|
#8408, "Mercy of the Typhoon."
|
This post is inspired by the month-old posts regarding legacies, Nepenthesque answers, and my curiousity.
Does mercy of the typhoon work when an opponent flees, or only when an opponent dies? Do they have to be grouped, or just cabal'd? Or is it anyone (pc) that currently fights you? Thanks, indeed.
|
|
|
|
Another idea to improve this legacy - prevent rescues,
Jagaub,
02-May-05 01:33 PM, #11
RE: Another idea to improve this legacy - prevent rescu...,
nepenthe,
02-May-05 01:44 PM, #12
Hey Nep...,
NewTrapper,
27-Apr-05 04:28 PM, #5
Egads!,
Mekantos,
27-Apr-05 10:26 PM, #6
Agree totally,
Narissa,
28-Apr-05 12:45 AM, #7
RE: Agree totally,
Enbuergo,
28-Apr-05 11:02 AM, #8
Yes, especially scary since deathblow tends to come int...,
elmeri_,
01-May-05 08:31 AM, #10
RE: Mercy of the Typhoon.,
ORB,
26-Apr-05 09:56 PM, #1
Agreed with suggestive tweakings,
Narissa,
26-Apr-05 10:34 PM, #2
RE: Agreed with suggestive tweakings,
nepenthe,
26-Apr-05 11:30 PM, #3
Does this mean,
Theerkla,
27-Apr-05 07:05 AM, #4
I believe it means that it is the only legacy that is c...,
elmeri_,
01-May-05 08:28 AM, #9
| |
|
Jagaub | Mon 02-May-05 01:33 PM |
Member since 28th Oct 2003
59 posts
| |
|
#8456, "Another idea to improve this legacy - prevent rescues"
In response to Reply #0
|
Add a chance to prevent the targetted person from being rescued. It makes sense in terms of the helpfile for Mercy of the Typhoon. Alternatively, you could add an additional strike against either the victim or the rescuer when rescuing.
If you do the rescue prevention bit, though, keep in mind that a necromancer can have many pets rescue him simultaneously, so the rescue prevention would either have to be very high to be effective or it would have to prevent all rescue attempts for a round when it's successful. (Or it could just be not as valuable versus necromancers.)
Those are just a couple of ideas I had on the subject. And to everyone else who may be wondering if I'm back - the answer for now is no. I was just curious and read up on what was new on the boards.
|
|
|
|
  |
nepenthe | Mon 02-May-05 01:44 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#8457, "RE: Another idea to improve this legacy - prevent rescu..."
In response to Reply #11
|
That's not what I had in mind to do, but it's interesting. I may factor that in somehow. (If I ever get around to retooling this thing.)
|
|
|
|
|
NewTrapper | Wed 27-Apr-05 04:28 PM |
Member since 14th Mar 2005
27 posts
| |
|
#8420, "Hey Nep..."
In response to Reply #0
|
With someone else's point about a better parting blow, how about a lagging parting blow? It'd make sense to allow a whirling strike when someone "leaves the Typhoon" - and it'd make it a worthy legacy choice.
Also, not to sound like a nag, but will you inform us when Mercy is updated like the others? I bet there are people willing to make characters and try it out (including myself) if we knew it was going to be fixed soon or is fixed.
NewTrapper
|
|
|
|
  |
Mekantos | Wed 27-Apr-05 10:26 PM |
Member since 06th Dec 2003
796 posts
| |
|
#8421, "Egads!"
In response to Reply #5
|
how about a lagging parting blow?
Let's think about this in conjunction with two particular powers; bloodthirst and eyes of flame.
Opponent walks into you (let's assume it's a dark, evil mage...like an anti-paladin or, better yet, a necromancer), you auto-attack him, beating him to pulp in about a round. He flees, and because of this nifty legacy he gets lagged long enough for you to re-engage. Rinse and repeat. That would be death on wheels, and no fun. Sure, someone can word out, avoiding the nasty, lagging parting blow, but there are a lot of people who can't, and there are lots of situations to render people who normally might be able to, incapable.
|
|
|
|
    |
Narissa | Thu 28-Apr-05 12:44 AM |
Member since 04th May 2003
279 posts
| |
|
#8422, "Agree totally"
In response to Reply #6
Edited on Thu 28-Apr-05 12:45 AM
|
Having a parting blow already is a scary thing. Making it as a lagging skill comes to overpowered.
I vote 'no' to the lag.
|
|
|
|
      |
Enbuergo | Thu 28-Apr-05 11:02 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
150 posts
| |
|
#8424, "RE: Agree totally"
In response to Reply #7
|
A second, weakened, parting blow would be nifty though.
|
|
|
|
    |
elmeri_ | Sun 01-May-05 08:31 AM |
Member since 13th Dec 2004
252 posts
| |
|
#8438, "Yes, especially scary since deathblow tends to come int..."
In response to Reply #6
|
|
|
|
ORB | Tue 26-Apr-05 09:56 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
993 posts
| |
|
#8415, "RE: Mercy of the Typhoon."
In response to Reply #0
|
It sucks beyond belief, don't bother taking it. That which does not kill us, makes us stronger.
|
|
|
|
  |
Narissa | Tue 26-Apr-05 10:34 PM |
Member since 04th May 2003
279 posts
| |
|
#8417, "Agreed with suggestive tweakings"
In response to Reply #1
|
This is one of the legacy that needs lots of love. I would like to see the legacy where it is useful against side attacks. Mercy of the typhoon sounds like the only safe place is in the center, ie. the warrior. Everything around should be a blur.
1. So my suggestion is side first attacks like circle, knife, mule-kick, or pincer have a chance to miss the warrior. This only kicks in when the warrior is already fighting another opponent.
Eg. Warrior fights OpponentA. OpponentB (thief) who is not involved in the fight tries to knife, but legacy kicks in with a chanced riposte. Thief misses due to legacy and gets drawn in the fight. This legcay is useful against thieves who flee-knife. Another OpponentC (warrior) comes in and tries to pincer, legacy successfully kicks in. Pincer misses but riposte failed. OpponentC gets drawn into the fight.
AND/OR (depending on the game balance)
2. This legacy gives an additional parting blow. OpponentA flees, gets warrior parting blow plus legacy parting blow (trying to get out from a typhoon is no easy matter). Next target is OpponentB (thief), with which legacy kicks in with a new damagable attack on the thief. Thief flees. Parting blow misses but legacy kicks in successfully. Thief gets hit and dies. Automatically the legacy kicks in and hits at OpponentC (warrior) with a new damagable attack.
Hope the Imms get the picture.
|
|
|
|
    |
nepenthe | Tue 26-Apr-05 11:30 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
3430 posts
| |
|
#8418, "RE: Agreed with suggestive tweakings"
In response to Reply #2
|
>This is one of the legacy that needs lots of love.
This is pretty much the sole legacy on my list right now. I haven't had much coding time lately.
|
|
|
|
      |
Theerkla | Wed 27-Apr-05 07:05 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
1055 posts
| |
|
#8419, "Does this mean"
In response to Reply #3
|
You have recently tweaked other legacies you felt were in need of change, or that after reviewing all the legacies this is the only one you decided needs change?
|
|
|
|
        |
elmeri_ | Sun 01-May-05 08:28 AM |
Member since 13th Dec 2004
252 posts
| |
|
#8437, "I believe it means that it is the only legacy that is c..."
In response to Reply #4
|
Some legacy tweaks have happened lately, for example the warcry one.
|
|
|
|
|