|
The Mass | Wed 09-Feb-05 01:51 PM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
74 posts
| |
|
#7262, "Rending gale and airshield"
|
Is a rending gale attack meant to be an air-based attack? And if so, shouldn't airshield protect against it?
|
|
|
|
|
Grurk Muouk | Wed 09-Feb-05 04:15 PM |
Member since 15th Mar 2004
538 posts
| |
|
#7263, "This has"
In response to Reply #0
|
This has been brought up in the past, on the bug board... It was ruled by design then. I think the reason given was "area author's disgression".
Not making a stand either way, just relaying what I remember.
G.
|
|
|
|
  |
The Mass | Thu 10-Feb-05 02:07 AM |
Member since 04th Mar 2003
74 posts
| |
|
#7271, "RE: This has"
In response to Reply #1
|
Did a search for it, and found something about it from back in 2003 (which explains why I don't remember it, since I didn't play that year). It wasn't area author's disgression (rending gales can be found in more than one area). Nep said it was that way due to something about how damage was defined and it could possibly be updated at some point in the future. So, uh, I guess this is just sort of a reminder in case things have been changed to more easliy allow for it.
|
|
|
|
|